Gubbmint Introduces Bill to Curb Catalytic Converter Theft

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

gubbmint introduces bill to curb catalytic converter theft

Hands up if you or someone you know has had a brush with catalytic converter theft. Packed with valuable metals, unsavory sorts have been helping themselves to this easily accessible part of a car’s exhaust system, often attacking it with a reciprocating saw and making away with the item in just a few seconds. Now, the government is (re)introducing a bill that may help curtail thefts.

Called the Preventing Auto Recycling Thefts Act (or the PART Act, aren’t they clever), the bi-partisan bill aims to reduce catalytic converter theft by requiring automakers to stamp a VIN or other identifying information onto the part’s surface. The hope is that thieves will think twice before stealing the converter if they know it can be traced back to a particular car, not to mention the supposed ease of identifying a car to which a converter belongs if a bunch of the things is recovered in a bust or chop shop raid.

As per usual, politicians bloviated at length about this initiative, with Congress member Jim Baird saying they “want to empower our law enforcement to hold these thieves accountable,” and Congress member Betty McCollum saying the proposed legislation is one way of “providing tools for investigators to link stolen catalytic converters to the vehicles from which they were stolen.” Fair enough, then.

Apparent loopholes or gaps in the existing criminal code language allegedly mean that cops must catch a criminal in the act of removing the part in order to prosecute a case. We’re not sure if VINs or other identifying information hammered into a catalytic converter will deter the most hardened of criminals, but averting even one theft can be construed as a win. Such a requirement will create more work for car companies, though they surely have existing procedures on which they can draw to pair individual VINs with converters as they arrive at a factory.

The National Insurance Crime Bureau says the number of reported catalytic converter thefts rose from 3,389 in 2019 to 14,433 in 2020. More recent numbers – with different bookends – from insurance company State Farm estimate the problem in an even harsher light, saying that between July 2021 and June 2022 catalytic converter theft more than doubled during that period when over 43,000 of these parts were reportedly taken.

[Image: fru-fru/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Join the conversation
2 of 34 comments
  • Mike Bradley Mike Bradley on Feb 23, 2023

    New California laws require recyclers to keep specific records on the parts they buy and sell, and require used catalytic converters to be sold only by authorized parties.

  • Mary Mary 7 days ago

    Hello, my name is Mary George. In fact, I was fooled by a dishonest broker who disappeared with my funds a few months ago. I contacted H a c k Mavens and gave him everything he needed to help in recovering my 4.7 BTC and I am glad he recovered my money. Although I was skeptical at first, I can boldly tell the world to contact H A C K M A V E N S 5 @ G M A I L . C O M or Call/Text/WhatsApp: + 1 (2 0 9) 4 1 7 – 1 9 5 7 for all kinds of h a c k i n g services. He is always straight forward and ready to answer every question put across to him. Best regards!

  • Bullnuke Chief Transition Officer, eh? And the term "Lean Manufacturing" being spoken... Is that the sound of the headsman's axe being ground sharp that I hear in the background? Brings back memories of the late '00s at my old OEM coatings plant.
  • BEPLA At the right price, would be a great EV conversion candidate.
  • BEPLA In other news: It costs more to eat out than to eat at home.
  • Kwik_Shift I like, because I don't have to look at them. Just by feel and location while driving.
  • Dwford This is the last time we are making these, so you better hurry up and buy (until the next time we make them, that is)