Mercedes to Focus on Premium Luxury Vehicles Again
Mercedes-Benz has said it will cut back its entry-level offers to better prioritize premium vehicles with loftier margins. While this strategy has become relatively uncommon throughout the industry, even among some mainstream brands, Mercedes has historically been synonymous with high-end luxury cars. One wonders why it bothered chasing volume to begin with, especially since it doesn’t seem to have panned out for the company.
While executives had previously hinted at its revised strategy in interviews, Mercedes officially unveiled its plan to investors on Thursday. The German brand will focus investments on top-of-the-heap models like the S-Class at the expense of entry-level products that have failed to garner juicy profits.
“What has always been the core of our brand is now also the core of our strategy: the luxury segment. We are further sharpening the focus of our business model and product portfolio in order to maximise [sic] the potential of Mercedes-Benz even in challenging conditions. At the heart of that is our goal to build the world’s most desirable cars,” stated Ola Källenius, Chairman of the Board of Management of Mercedes-Benz Group.
The company is basically taking into account today’s supply chain constraints (e.g. chip shortages, bottlenecks, increasing cost), realizing that volume-focused models with lower MSRPs won’t net it the same kind of profits as a few six-figure G 550. We only need this year’s financial metrics to see that plan in action. In the first quarter of 2022, Mercedes sold 10 percent fewer vehicles than the same period in 2021 (which was already a lean year). However, its profits were up by a whopping 20 percent within the same timeframe.
Mercedes-Benz will recalibrate its product portfolio, allocating more than 75 [percent] of its investments to develop products for the most profitable market segments. As part of this sharpened strategy, Mercedes-Benz aims to grow the sales share of its Top-End vehicles by around 60 [percent] by 2026 versus 2019 and intends to achieve higher quality growth and a further significant increase in profitability and resilience, striving for an operating margin target of approximately 14 [percent] by mid of the decade in favourable [sic] market conditions. This greater focus on the top end of the market should enable the company to deliver a strong financial result even under more challenging market conditions. The company’s strategic decision to become fully electric by 2030 – wherever market conditions allow – and the ambition to become CO2-neutral by 2039 are integral elements to enhance the connection between luxury and sustainability.
In 2021, the Mercedes-Benz S-Class reported an increase of 40 percent. Meanwhile, the high-performance AMG and uber-luxury Maybach arms set records of their own. Mercedes believes that the market for premium vehicles will remain strong, whereas entry-level products will not.
To account for this, it’s going to rejigger its product portfolio and development team to focus on Mercedes-AMG, Mercedes-Maybach, “Top-End” models from Mercedes-EQ, the S-Class, the G-Class, and the GLS. There will also be some room carved out for limited-edition models and exclusive collaboration vehicles, though the company did not get into specifics.
Meanwhile, its more humble products, such as the A-Class, will be seeing fewer variants. We may even witness some models being removed from the lineup in the coming years. Customers that decide to order from Mercedes will soon notice that sweeping equipment packages will replace some individual options. The company said that reducing complexity will allow it to offer compressive packages based upon regional trends while saving itself a lot of trouble during production. It also allows the brand to charge more in most cases, broadening profit margins.
However, this will require some tweaking at the factory. Executives have explained that they’re not interested in chasing volume, but that they’ll still need to retool some facilities to optimize new production routines. Though your author would argue that there’s nothing luxurious about nixing built-to-order vehicles.
Markus Schäfer, head of development at Daimler, was quoted as saying by Automotive News, that the transition toward reduced complexity will dramatically change logistics in just about every market it currently occupies. But he remained confident that it would ultimately benefit Mercedes’ bottom line.
“The willingness to pay is there,” he said. “Many, many customers are ready to pay the extra price for luxury.”
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Stuart de Baker I didn't bother to read this article. I'll wait until a definitive headline comes out, and I'll be surprised if Tesla actually produces the Cybertruck. It certainly looks impractical for both snowy and hot sunny weather.
- Stuart de Baker This is very interesting information. I was in no danger of buying a Tesla. I love my '08 Civic (stick), and it feels just as responsive as when I bought it 11 years ago with 35k on the clock (now 151k), and barring mishaps, I plan to keep it for the next 25 years or so, which would put me into my mid-90s, assuming I live that long. On your information, I will avoid renting Teslas.
- RHD The only people who would buy this would be those convinced by a website that they are great, and order one sight-unseen. They would have to have be completely out of touch with every form of media for the last year. There might actually be a few of these people, but not very many. They would also have to be completely ignorant of the Hyundai Excel. (Vinfast seems to make the original Excel look like a Camry in comparison.)
- RHD This was awesome, in 1978. Now, it's very much obsolete - thirsty, slow, ponderous, noisy, rough, and dated design even in its time. Still, someone who wants to recreate some distant memories will buy it and restore it and enjoy it, and the seller just has to find that particular individual.
- BEPLA Cybertruck may have made some kind of weird sense had it been brought on market on time, ie: before Rivian and F150 Lightning.But the market has progressed.If this were any normal company it would be ditched for a more competitive product.But in Elon's narcissistic dreamworld - well, we'll just see how it flops.
"Though your author would argue that there’s nothing luxurious about nixing built-to-order vehicles." Absolutely correct. Luxury and exclusivity demand personalizing a vehicle not paying for bloated option packages, many of which contain items and features not wanted or used. The manufacturers make their profit by loading packages onto customers who really want one or two features but have to pay for several more unwanted features. Mercedes, as are most manufacturers, is now purely profit driven, almost to the detriment of the cars they make. They are in business to make money but that's probably not the approach a "luxury" vehicle manufacturer should boast about. Then again, perhaps customers these days really don't care anymore and just willy-nilly hand over small fortunes for these option loaded cars that often vary only by color. And as we all know, many folks want their car/house/TV/food/coffee/any products...instantly. Few want to wait.
So will the "premium" Mercedes herald the return of the bank-vault build quality, the near-eternal longevity of the powertrains, the revival of the Teutonic driving experience, and the end of all the overpriced, breakable plastic parts in the engine bay? I doubt it.