BMW & Mercedes Offload Car Sharing Business

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
bmw mercedes offload car sharing business

BMW and Mercedes-Benz are dumping ShareNow — their jointly managed car-sharing businesses — and Stellantis will reportedly become the recipient. Effectively a merger of BMW’s DriveNow and Mercedes’ (technically Daimler AG’s) slurry of similar services that were rolled into car2go, ShareNow’s individual components have spent the last decade trying to figure out which markets would embrace app-based, roadside rentals charging by the minute and which would reject it.

As with most ride-sharing firms, it took years of trial and error to learn how best to manage a decentralized fleet that’s still beholden to a single cooperate entity. Pricing also represented a challenge, with similar businesses initially trying to keep rates low to grow their user base before getting to the tricky business of finagling real profitability. However, this ultimately forced ShareNow to downsize in 2019, pulling out of the United States entirely to better prioritize Europe.

The company now limits itself to fifteen of the continent’s most densely packed cities, with management citing increased costs and competition the further it ventured from Western Europe. But this was exactly what Stellantis was looking for, according to Reuters:

Brigitte Courtehoux, who heads Stellantis’ mobility division Free2move, said the deal was part of the group’s plans to grow net revenue from that business to 700 million euros ($735 million) in 2025 and to 2.8 billion euros in 2030, up from 40 million euros last year.

“We will really accelerate in terms of revenue,” she said.

Stellantis will strengthen its mobility division Free2move via the deal, hoping a global push to cut emissions will also drive demand for car-sharing and open new profit streams.

Over the next decade, Stellantis intends to expand Free2move’s presence worldwide, growing it to 15 million active users.

It’s sort of a curious decision, considering the service it’s buying literally attempted the same thing and ended up downsizing to focus almost entirely on German cities and a handful of European metropolises beyond the borders of Deutschland. BMW and Mercedes’ joint operation is currently presumed to lose 200 million euros per year. But Stellantis believes it has a secret weapon in terms of product.

ShareNow presently offers a mix of smaller vehicles from BMW, Mini, Mercedes, and Smart that differs between regions. Free2move would gradually replace those with offerings from Jeep, Peugeot, and Fiat. Stellantis also wants to have entirely electrified fleets in Europe by 2030 and the U.S. by 2035.

“Maybe Stellantis, with its low financial investment and a leaner cost structure, can make more out of it,” Juergen Pieper, an analyst at Bankhaus Metzler, suggested.

Pieper has estimated that the transaction likely wouldn’t exceed $525 million and was likely closer to $262 million. However other outlets have cited the deal as being closer to $100 million.

[Image: Dutchmen Photography/Shutterstock]

Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Vww12 Vww12 on May 04, 2022

    Why would Stellantis invest in a failing service? There must be some sort of twisted incentive here. That, or they are nuts. There is evidence the ShareNow management was also addled. First, they abandoned gasoline and went electric. Then they went out of business in the U.S. and one of their excuses was... "limited infrastructure for supporting electric vehicles." Morons.

  • SPPPP SPPPP on Jul 20, 2022

    Where have I seen this management style before? Oddly reminiscent of the villains from Batman?

  • Lou_BC "Owners of affected Wrangles" Does a missing "r" cancel an extra stud?
  • Slavuta One can put a secret breaker that will disable the starter or spark plug supply. Even disabling headlights or all lights will bring more trouble to thieves than they wish for. With no brake lights, someone will hit from behind, they will leave fingerprints inside. Or if they steal at night, they will have to drive with no lights. Any of these things definitely will bring attention.I remember people removing rotor from under distributor cup.
  • Slavuta Government Motors + Government big tech + government + Federal police = fascist surveillance state. USSR surveillance pales...
  • Johnster Another quibble, this time about the contextualization of the Thunderbird and Cougar, and their relationship to the prestigious Continental Mark. (I know. It's confusing.) The Thunderbird/Mark IV platform introduced for the 1971 model year was apparently derived from the mid-sized Torino/Montego platform (also introduced for the 1971 model year), but should probably be considered different from it.As we all know, the Cougar shared its platform with the Ford Mustang up through the 1973 model year, moving to the mid-sized Torino/Montego platform for the 1974 model year. This platform was also shared with the failed Ford Gran Torino Elite, (introduced in February of 1974, the "Gran Torino" part of the name was dropped for the 1975 and 1976 model years).The Thunderbird/Mark series duo's separation occurred with the 1977 model year when the Thunderbird was downsized to share a platform with the LTD II/Cougar. The 1977 model year saw Mercury drop the "Montego" name and adopt the "Cougar" name for all of their mid-sized cars, including plain 2-doors, 4-doors and and 4-door station wagons. Meanwhile, the Cougar PLC was sold as the "Cougar XR-7." The Cougar wagon was dropped for the 1978 model year (arguably replaced by the new Zephyr wagon) while the (plain) 2-door and 4-door models remained in production for the 1978 and 1979 model years. It was a major prestige blow for the Thunderbird. Underneath, the Thunderbird and Cougar XR-7 for 1977 were warmed-over versions of the failed Ford Elite (1974-1976), while the Mark V was a warmed-over version of the previous Mark IV.
  • Stuart de Baker This is depressing, and I don't own one of these.