Rare Rides Icons: The History of Stutz, Stop and Go Fast (Part IX)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

We pick back up in the Stutz story today, at a time when (once again) all was new and promising at the luxury brand. Under the company’s new ownership, Stutz had the funding for Italian craftsmanship and hand-built goodness. The all-new Stutz Blackhawk entered production in 1971.

Nineteen feet long and full of wood, precious metals, and optional mink upholstery, the Blackhawk asked for a stunning amount of money that was far greater than domestic personal luxury coupes and more than a Rolls-Royce. At a base ask of $22,500 ($162,533 adj.) in 1971 dollars, there were few cars that actually competed with the Blackhawk’s purchasable exclusivity. And said exclusivity attracted some very wealthy people. Let’s talk celebrity status.

Mind you, the Stutz showrooms of old attracted the wealthy too. Art Deco marketing materials showed luxurious scenes and made safety promises, and carried memories of the company’s racing pedigree. Stutz cars of the Twenties drew the sort of generational wealth Americans who spent six figures (adjusted) on a car in the times nearing the Great Depression.

But in the Seventies, the revived Stutz clientele was a bit different. The brand immediately found a base among the rich and famous, primarily of the entertainer variety. The very “first” Blackhawk was sold to none other than Elvis Presley. Presley plunked down $26,500 ($193,371 adj.) for his heavily modified Grand Prix. He paid in October 1970, before the Blackhawk was actually in production. In reality, he purchased the second prototype that was built as the company’s proof of concept.

The first prototype was already spoken for, as it was the personal ride of company president James O’Donnell. Differences between the two concept cars were present, as they were built by different coachbuilders. As mentioned previously, the first prototype was built at great expense by Ghia, while the actual build work was initially contracted to Carrozzeria Padane. That firm constructed the second prototype, probably to prove they could build the car to the same quality that the more well-known Ghia did.

Elvis wasn’t the only musical entertainer past the prime of their career interested in the second new Blackhawk, as Frank Sinatra raised his hand too. Elvis won out in the end because he was a bit less picky than Sinatra. The deal to purchase the prototype had a string attached: Stutz distributor Jules Meyers was permitted to display the Blackhawk at the LA Auto Show in 1970, and the buyer would pose for PR pictures with the Blackhawk when he took delivery.

Sinatra said, “I can’t go for that” or similar, and declined. Elvis was more ready to accept that others should see his personal vehicle and was also obliged in the photo op. Shortly after delivery, Elvis sent his Blackhawk off to tasteful modifier George Barris for some edits. He also spent a pretty penny in January of 1971 when he had almost unheard of technology – a car phone – installed in the Blackhawk. The enormous appliance asked $1,467 ($10,597 adj.).

After all the expense, corporate publicity strings, and impressive edits, Elvis enjoyed his Blackhawk for around six months in total. In July of 1971, a driver in Elvis’ employ crashed the Blackhawk and totaled it. With a huge insurance claim pending, the distributor offered The King $1,000 for the wrecked coupe. Given the phone in the center console was worth more than that offer, Elvis decided to keep the wreckage and put it in storage.

That wasn’t the end of the prototype though; it was restored years later with an assemblage of parts from various sources and put on display at Graceland. The customized Blackhawk is still on display there today. Elvis was very impressed with his short Blackhawk stint and would proceed to buy three more, and lease a fourth. A 1971 example was a gift for his personal doctor, Elias Ganhem (pictured here). Elvis preferred only white and black Blackhawks, and the last one he purchased in 1973 is on display alongside the restored prototype.

A super fan of the revived Stutz, Elvis seemingly spent more on Blackhawks than (almost) anyone else. The initial dealing with Stutz must have left Sinatra cold, because he stayed away from the brand. At least he received an entire special edition of the Imperial bearing his name a decade later, though that didn’t end well either.

But other celebrities came calling for their own garish Blackhawk. Early adopters like Lucille Ball and Dick Martin in 1971 were joined by Sammy Davis Jr., who purchased a husband and wife pair in 1972. Dean Martin created a similar history to Elvis with his Blackhawk purchases and bought three. He was at the wheel of his 1972 example when he crashed it, and at the time it unironically wore a vanity plate: “DRUNKY.”

Other buyers through the early seventies included Evel Knievel, Wilson Pickett, Luigi Colani, and baseball player Lou Brock in 1974. Musical talents like Johnny Cash and Johnnie Taylor purchased in 1975. Bond villain actor Curt Jurgens bought a Blackhawk in 1977 and was joined a year later in the ownership club by Erik Estrada.

In the early Eighties, the brand earned a raft of new celebrity owners like Jerry Lewis, Billy Joel, Elton John, Paul McCartney, Al Pacino, and Barry White, with additional overdue purchases from Liberace and Wayne Newton. George Foreman had one, and so did Tom Jones. Willy Nelson bought a Blackhawk, but the singular purchase paled in comparison to the biggest fan of all, the Shah of Iran. He owned 12.

It’s almost hard to imagine a single coachbuilt-type vehicle in modern times attracting such a large group of famous owners. Especially one that had domestic underpinnings like the Blackhawk. But the coupe stood out and was apparently just right for the times and the image these stars wanted to project. During its tenure, the Blackhawk was well represented in movies and television, too. It appeared in no less than five major motion pictures, as well as some appearances in TV shows like Columbo.

As the folks at Stutz saw their only model gain in popularity and standing with the Hollywood elite types, the price of the Blackhawk increased accordingly. The price jumps weren’t small inflation-driven increases either, as we’ll see here. By 1974 the base price was $35,000 ($215,936 adj.). There was quite a jump the following year, as in 1975 the Blackhawk commanded at least $41,500 ($229,009 adj.) Pricing continued to climb throughout the remainder of the decade, with Stutz raking in the dough because of its exclusivity. In 1981 the Blackhawk had doubled over its Seventies ask and was priced at $84,500 ($279,242 adj.). That price paled in comparison to the convertible Stutz offered, which was advertised without irony as the most expensive car on sale. But we’ll talk about that another day.

The Blackhawk was sold in several different series, as designers continued to fiddle with Virgil Exner’s original work. Changes nearly every year meant things kept fresh, and each “new” Blackhawk could continue to command huge money. We’ll talk about the various series of the Blackhawk next time, as well as the amazingly expensive D’Italia convertible.

[Images: Stutz, YouTube]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
 3 comments
  • FreedMike FreedMike on Apr 26, 2022

    Wow, talk about the perfect Elvis-mobile... And by all accounts, Dean Martin's drunkenness was largely an act.

    • Funky D Funky D on Apr 27, 2022

      Same goes for one of Dean's favorite roasters, Foster Brooks, who as the story goes, quit drinking in 1964 to win a $10 bet. Everything he did on TV was a total act, and uproariously funny! They don't make 'em like him anymore. The Stutz was probably the most 70s car ever designed and built. And yeah, I'd totally drive one!

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Apr 26, 2022

    "In July of 1971, a driver in Elvis’ employ crashed the Blackhawk and totaled it." Which is exactly why I don't have a driver. (Ok, one reason. The other reasons include never going anywhere and not having any money.)

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next