Rare Rides Icons: The History of Imperial, More Than Just a Car (Part XII)
As we make our way into the 12th installment of Rare Rides Icon’s Imperial coverage, the third generation 1967 Imperial became the shortest-lived in the nameplate’s history. After the decade-long reign of the D-body, Imperial switched to the unibody C platform to cut costs, and move on from dated body-on-frame underpinnings. But it was an odd time to introduce a new car, as the C-body was no spring chicken when the Imperial debuted. More importantly, Chrysler was on the cusp of an entirely new styling direction: The Fuselage Look.
It was 1969, and square, conservative shoulders were a thing of the past at Chrysler. Compared to the year before, the ’69 Imperials looked longer, lower, wider, heavier, and smoother. Elwood Engel was at the helm of Imperial’s design once more, as he got to design his first clean break Imperials. Gone were the quad exposed headlamps inset into a horizontally slatted grille, and in their place was a full-width grille of many small rectangles, like so many household floor vents.
Said rectangles were stacked and arranged in two distinct sections separated by chrome bars. Grilles extended over concealed headlamps, hidden away behind electrically operated doors. Front bumpers now came to a point and were smooth and more flush than they’d been the prior generation. Corner markers were still there and still wore a similar detail to the grille. Also carried over were the battering rams at either corner of the front end. Triple segment cornering lamps were a new feature on the lower fender. Finally, the Imperial eagle vacated the grille; it was now located on the hood.
The Imperial’s side profile was rounded, and body metal drew inward at the bottom and became narrower. It was a design detail commonly found on ships and airliners called tumblehome. The look was very imposing, and more slab-sided than its predecessor even though it was more round overall. Shapely flanks meant there was curved side glass, which increased interior shoulder room for passengers without altering the exterior width of the car.
Shoulder pads enjoyed 62.7 inches of space front and rear, up from 59.4 inches the year prior. Lower side chrome trim detailing of 1968 disappeared for 1969, as a chrome spear returned slightly below the sharp hood line. It ran Imperial’s full length, and ended abruptly at a rear clip that was an updated and modernized version of 1968’s design.
Chrome vertical detailing was still present on either side of the rear bumper, but the bumper was blended in with the fenders instead of as a separate entity. Full-width tail lamps went away, replaced by two large horizontal lenses that had almost no detailing and no grille design covering them. The Imperial eagle vacated the lamp assembly area and moved upward onto the trunk lid. The bumper had less detailing than the prior year. It appeared as a sleek horizontal bar and looked more integrated.
New Fuselage Look Imperials were on the same C-body as they were in 1968, but all Chrysler’s largest offerings received full redesigns this year to fit the new corporate appearance. Other C-body cars remained the same familiar names as before, like 300, Town & Country, and New Yorker. And speaking of New Yorker, there was further cost-cutting in 1969 as Imperial shared some body panels with its lesser cousin. It was the first time such sharing occurred since the badge and trim job Imperials of 1956. All Imperial glass and roofs were shared with the lowly Chrysler Newport. Disgusting!
The Imperial was naturally the largest of the lot, as Chrysler took the brand further into enormous car territory in 1969. At an overall length of 229.7 inches, Imperial was more than five inches longer than the prior year. Width decreased slightly with Fuselage, from 79.6″ to 79.1 for 1969. The new design was notably lower than before, as the height dropped from 57 inches to 55.7. Overall weight was around the same as before: Between 4,900 to 5,200 pounds dependent upon body style. Imperials had three inches of length on any Chrysler, which was down to a stretched wheelbase of 127 inches.
Imperial’s interior design was reworked notably with its new generation. In front of the driver was a much more modern-looking four-spoke steering wheel with a lower chrome rim. Upscale LeBaron models had a full chrome ring and read LeBaron on a more sculpted horn pad. On the door panel, switches moved to a horizontal placement and were no longer angled toward the driver for a cockpit feel.
Elsewhere, gauges remained largely horizontal in nature but spread out more in 1969 than they had before. Said gauges were now black and backed by faux wood. The subtly concealed radio compartment was replaced by an exposed radio unit that was closer to the driver. The sweeping and uncluttered horizontal dash angled away from the driver was replaced by a binnacle that contained all instrumentation. That part of the dash was still angled away from the driver, but a near-vertical glovebox lid was angled slightly toward the passenger. That glove box area previewed the styling direction Chrysler would take later with many of its dashboards, through about 1989.
Most engineering was carried over from the third-gen Imperials. Customers were already familiar with the 440 (7.2L) Wedge V8 and three-speed A727 TorqueFlite. Chrysler’s unique torsion bar suspension was also a carryover. Assembly of all Imperials occurred at the traditional Jefferson Avenue Assembly location, as a second production line at Belvedere was no longer necessary.
Body styles were one fewer than they were in 1968, as 1969’s lineup lacked the pricy and unpopular Imperial convertible. Left were the two-door hardtop, basic four-door sedan, and most upscale four-door hardtop sedan. The new series numbers broke with tradition this year, as DY1 (M, H) became EY (L, M). Based on Imperial’s past history, this nomenclature would indicate Chrysler decided there were base and mid-level Imperials, but no range-topping version. There were only two trim levels in 1969, Crown (L) and LeBaron (M).
Crowns were available as two- and four-door hardtops, as well as the pillared sedan. The LeBaron trim was offered in hardtop guise only, two- and four-doors. At Crown specification, the asking price was $5,753 ($45,054 adj.) for sedan or hardtop, a change from prior generations. The two-door Crown was $5,575 ($43,660 adj.).
LeBaron with two doors was $5,881 ($46,057 adj.), or $6,114 ($47,881 adj.) with four. The asking prices were a decent jump over New Yorker, which topped out at $4,598 ($36,009 adj.) for a four-door hardtop. Prices were reduced from the prior year, perhaps as similarities to Chryslers increased and the LeBaron name declined in prestige. Recall a LeBaron from 1968 asked $6,939 ($56,559 adj.).
Tops was still the custom-order LeBaron by Stageway limousine, which held eight passengers and was priced between $12,000 ($93,978 adj.) and $15,000 ($117,472 adj.). New lower pricing and the Fuselage Look increased sales in 1969, which jumped from 15,367 to 22,083. Six of those were the limousine.
The less expensive Imperials were a success from a sales perspective, even if the quality and parts sharing were not what a Fifties Imperial shopper expected. Chrysler tinkered with the C-body Imperial in the years to come, as the brand headed downhill toward the end. More on that next time.
Pianoboy57 on Jan 14, 2022
One evening in 1971 my family cruised a couple of lots looking at family sedans. The Chrysler Plymouth dealer had two 4dr hardtops in the showroom. One was lime green and the other was pink. Both had white tops and interiors. I favored a yellow car with white top and interior back then. They bought a beige and brown Pontiac. ugh!
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- SPPPP Very nice shape, but I just never warmed to the E60 car like I did the earlier generations of the 5-series, or the contemporary 3-series.
- Mike Beranek They're building a brand-new "vending machine" in Schaumburg, right on my way home from work. Maybe after they go belly up, I could buy it, build out living space on the top floor, and use the rest to display my awesome car collection (ha!)
- VoGhost We're at the point where the stock price is no longer relevant; focus on how the debt is priced.
- MaintenanceCosts Nice color combo. Worth noting that this is not a conventional automatic but an automated manual, which gets you all the roughness of a real manual with none of the fun. Also not sure why everyone loves the V10 so much; it sounds more UPS truck than performance car except at the extreme high end of the tach. Having said that the E60's looks have aged VERY well; the car looks nicer now than it did when it was new.
- Kcflyer just happy it's not black, white or silver. hooray for color choice