By on December 29, 2021

2021 Ford Bronco Sport Badlands Fast Facts

2.0-liter turbocharged four cylinder (245 horsepower @ 5,500 rpm, 275 lb-ft @ 3,000 rpm)

Eight-speed automatic, four-wheel drive

21 city / 26 highway / 23 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)

11.1 city / 8.9 highway / 10.1 combined. (NRCan Rating, L/100km)

Base Price: $32,660 (U.S) / $41,044 (Canada)

As Tested: $35,745 (U.S.) / $44,089 (Canada)

Prices include $1,495 destination charge in the United States and $2,195 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

Ford’s full-size Bronco has been hogging the spotlight all year long, but the smaller Ford Bronco Sport, which actually rides on the Escape platform, is doing all it can to get some attention.

Exhibit A: The off-road chops of the Badlands trim – which is meant to spend time in the dirt. This little ‘ute is pretty dang good on pavement, but it also did things that shocked and surprised me when I took it to the Badlands Off-Park in Attica, Indiana. The name is just a coincidence.

Before I get to the Bronco Sport’s surprising feats, let’s back up and go over the vitals. Opting for the Badlands trim gets you the 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder that makes 245 horsepower and 275 lb-ft of torque. It mates to an eight-speed automatic transmission, and this bad boy has four-wheel drive, naturally.

On-road, the Bronco Sport is fairly delightful to drive, which I chalk up to the Escape’s underpinnings. I’ve found the current Escape to be a good handler with a generally pleasant ride, and that translates to the Bronco Sport, even with the latter’s focus on off-road ability. The Bronco Sport handles corners better than one would expect from a short, tall SUV, although body roll does come in after a certain point. Switching to Sport mode livens up the proceedings somewhat, but we’re still talking about a tall crossover, not a sports car, here.

It’s also a composed freeway cruiser. Both the front and rear suspension are independent, with the front being a MacPherson strut setup and the rear being a double-lateral link with semi-trailing arms. Badlands trims get front struts with hydraulic rebound stops and softer coil springs and anti-roll bars. The rear suspension has 46-millimeter-diameter shocks.

My biggest beef on the long freeway jaunt to the Badlands was that wind noise, especially around the A-pillar, could be a bit loud.

The suspension setup may work well on the freeway, but it’s off-road focused. So, too, are the G.O.A.T (Goes Over Any Terrain) drive modes – Normal, Eco, Sport, Slippery and Sand, Mud/Ruts, and Rock Crawl. The latter two are not available on trims with the 1.5-liter turbocharged three-cylinder engine.

The Badlands park offers a variety of terrain – there are wooded dirt trails (some of which become quite soupy with mud when it rains), sandy hills, and areas for rock climbing. One can even ford streams (or ride along with them) in the right vehicle.

The Bronco Sport isn’t the right vehicle to do everything the Badlands offers – I avoided any serious mudding – but it handled the sandy hills and wooded trails mostly with ease, though the day I went was a bit chilly and some of the dirt was nicely packed thanks to the cold weather. Had it been slick mud, I’d have been more hesitant to attempt some trails, mostly because of the tires. Indeed, it was much warmer on a later trip I took with a 1.5-liter Bronco Sport, and I begged off some of the same obstacles I conquered with ease in the Badlands trim.

I even managed some light rock-crawling, though I did worry about one serious bang/crunch I heard. Thankfully, the skid plate saved me from making an embarrassing phone call while also saving the rig from any expensive damage.

All of the G.O.A.T modes I used worked as advertised. Indeed, if I forgot to flip the switch to the correct mode after switching terrain, the Bronco sometimes struggled a bit until I put it in the right mode, at which point it came to life and vanquished whatever terrain I was on.

To be clear, the Bronco Sport Badlands can’t do what a Jeep Wrangler or a full-size Bronco can when it comes to off-roading. But it gets a good percentage of the way there, and I suspect it could do even more with appropriate aftermarket rubber. I’d avoid serious mud and keep the rock-crawling to a minimum, but if you like to off-road on weekends, you should be able to handle most wooded trails and sandy surfaces, and perhaps even ford some streams.

Other off-road features on the Badlands trim include four skid plates, as previously noted, and front tow hooks. The ‘ute can ford water up to 23.6 inches deep, and the flooring is rubber for easy cleaning. The seats are also meant to be easy to clean after a day of muddin’.

The biggest letdown with the Bronco Sport is the interior. Even in top-trim, it feels a bit cheap, and you’re saddled with a tacked-on infotainment screen running Ford’s much-maligned Sync system. The seats also get a bit stiff on longer stints behind the wheel. The Badlands trim does, at least, offer a fair amount of creature comforts (although you need to order the Premium package, which costs over $2K and my tester did not have, to get things like dual-zone climate control, leather seats, heated steering wheel, and premium audio), and the controls are easy to use. I especially liked how the (sometimes obnoxious) lane-keeping system could be shut off with a quick flick of a switch on the turn-signal stalk.

That aside, the Bronco Sport remains near the top of my list when it comes to compact, five-seat crossovers. It’s not quite as well-rounded as the Toyota RAV4 – which has a nicer cabin – but the RAV4 can’t play in the boonies on the same level, not even in TRD Pro trim. Honda’s CR-V is the other top entry in this class, in my view, but it’s even more on-road-centric than the Toyota.

The Bronco Sport’s off-road ability, which is better, in my view, than the RAV’s or CR-Vs, even in the lower trims (which lose two G.O.A.T drive modes and some of the other off-road goodies), makes up for the chintzier interior.

Standard or available features include active grille shutters, LED fog lamps, LED headlights, separate glass opening for the liftgate, LED taillamps, tow hooks, two USB ports, tilt/telescope steering, front camera (180 degrees), paddle shifters, Sync 3 infotainment, keyless entry, and satellite radio. Co-Pilot 360+ replaced Co-Pilot 360 and added adaptive cruise control with stop-and-go and lane centering, navigation, speed-sign recognition, and evasive steering assist.

Standard across the Bronco Sport board is Co-Pilot 360, which includes pre-collision assist with automatic emergency braking and pedestrian detection, forward-collision warning and dynamic brake support, blind-spot information system with cross-traffic alert, lane-keeping system, automatic high beams, and a rearview camera.

Base price was $32,660, and with Co-Pilot+ ($795) and 17-inch wheels ($795) and $1,495 for destination, the price was $35,745. Fuel economy is listed at 21/26/23.

It is a bummer that Ford makes you buy the Badlands trim (or First Edition, which does not carry over into the 2022 MY) for the 2.0-liter, and it’s also a bummer that you can’t get the Badlands off-road equipment with the smaller engine. It’s annoying that if you want the extra power of the 2.0-liter, you must spend extra on off-road gear you might never use.

Yet, should you actually use this stuff, you’ll be pleasantly surprised. Heck, even if you don’t, you’ll find the on-road manners to be surprisingly good, relative to this class, anyway.

I don’t, at present, have a need for a five-seat compact crossover. Nor do I venture much into the great outdoors (something I probably should do more of). That said, if I was shopping in this class, I’d have a hard time being talked out of a Bronco Sport.

Yes, the RAV4 is better all around, and the CR-V is better for those who never leave the pavement. But there’s something about the Bronco Sport’s can-do attitude and abilities – especially how those abilities manifest themselves in the boondocks – that place the Bronco Sport high on the list.

What’s New for 2021

The Ford Bronco Sport is all-new for 2021, sharing a platform with the Ford Escape. It’s positioned as an adventure-ready, five-seat compact crossover that uses the famed Bronco name, despite being different than the full-size Bronco.

Who Should Buy It

The outdoorsy person who needs/wants a small, five-seat crossover than has true off-road chops. The city-dweller who likes the boxy shape also might want the Bronco Sport, but if he/she never leaves the pavement, there’s probably no need for the Badlands trim, unless engine power matters a lot.

[Images © 2021 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

24 Comments on “2021 Ford Bronco Sport Badlands Review – The Little SUV That Can...”

  • avatar
    SCE to AUX

    The aluminum imitation steel wheels look nice by themselves, but that particular vehicle is fifty shades of gray – not my taste.

    I guess it’s not a bad price if you really want to utilize the Badlands package, but in that price range I’d be looking at other options – with Ford low on the list.

  • avatar

    Seems better than the 3 little Jeeps (outside of towing on the V6 Cherokee) or the Wilderness Subarus. Although Tim didn’t mention any of that competition in the review.

    Both the Bronco Sport and Escape really should have the Maverick’s powertrain options though. Standard 2.5h with 2.0t available on *every* trim. Then send the current I3t to heaven. If Ford can offer it on the truck then they can do it on the CUVs too.

    • 0 avatar
      Tim Healey

      Haven’t driven the new Compass Trailhawk, and it’s been a looonnnnng time since I’ve driven a Cherokee Trailhawk, but it’s fair you point that out. The Cherokee Trailhawk is probably similar off-road. The Wilderness probably can’t go as far off-road, I had one and did not take it off-road.

  • avatar

    The Bronco Sport Badlands is on my very short list of my next auto purchase, that is if car buying returns to earth in the next couple of years. It’s too bad that you have to go with the highest trim to get the 2.0T, but you have to have the 2.0T, no other Ford engine is worth the bother in this class. The GOAT is nice to have, but the standard Ford AWD is more than most people would need in normal snow/muddy road or trail applications

    It’s kind of expensive, but I guess everything is now. The only better option might be a Maverick AWD with the 2.0T which might save you $5-$10K over the Bronco Sport

    Nice review

  • avatar
    kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh

    It looks too much like a LandRover …

  • avatar

    I don’t get why the RAV4 is always used as the standard by which other crossovers are measured. It’s noisy, harsh, rattle-y, unrefined… A Forester is more useful (and probably still more refined), while a CX-5 is a much better driver. The hybrid is neat but otherwise I will never understand RAV4 hype.

    • 0 avatar

      Packaging. The RAV4, CR-V, and Forester feel from the inside like they’re in a different and bigger class than many of the other entries in the segment (in particular, the Mazda and the Jeeps). Haven’t been in either a Bronco Sport or its Escape cousin yet, but given the Sport’s off-road hardware and the Escape’s low height I doubt they would be as roomy inside.

    • 0 avatar

      I had a RAV4 as a rental, and I couldn’t agree more. And I’d add “ugly” to your list of negatives. I’d pick the CX-5 from this list.

  • avatar

    I’m sure this is a good enough CUV, and the styling is more coherent than many. But it’s just one more manifestation of what has turned into an all-consuming craze. I’ll be happy when people no longer feel the urge to pretend that their local Kroger parking lot or office park garage is Moab, and everything no longer tries to look like an off-road truck.

  • avatar

    Interior looks a bit cheap to me for $35,000.

  • avatar

    This is yet another vehicle Ford really phoned in. An Escape with a different body is not all that appealing because the Escape is mediocre at best. The body body can’t make up for its short comings.

    It’s overpriced, the interior is terribly cheap, the exterior styling is not cohesive, and it looks like it’s riding on 4 spare tires. Awful.

    The quality is awful too. 6 recalls and it’s been on sale for barely a year.

    Word of advice, if you need a proper, small off roader, skip the reskinned Escape and get something better for probably less money.

    • 0 avatar

      The wheel choices many manufacturers are pumping out lately leave a lot to be desired. The wheel choices on most of the Bronco Sport range from bad to ugly. I recently tried pricing and building a 2021/2022 Kia Sorrento and hated the fact that the majority of wheel choices were all dark grey or black. You could only get normal silver wheels on the lowest trim level, the EX or the pricier hybrid. They need to leave the dark finish stuff as an option or choice instead of std.

      Another Ford product that is hard to get the wheels I like is the Ranger and Maverick. On the Ranger XLT, which is the one I would choose, you have to check off the Sport trim package just to get a leather wheel and a few other things which forces those life sucking dark grey wheels. The Maverick XLT makes you get AWD and the 2.0T and adds well over 3K to the price just to get some okay wheels.

      This is one area GM does it better. They make normal wheels as std on most models and then offer a blackout or Sport edition exterior for those that like the murdered out dark look which at least gives the consumer choice.

  • avatar

    I’m not a fan of crossovers or SUVs, partially because they all tend to write visual checks about their off-road chops that they can’t cash. This vehicle isn’t for me, but I give kudos for Ford for backing up the macho styling with actual capability.

  • avatar

    Ford, Please… don’t start behaving like GM. Why can’t I get a base or Big Bend trim level Bronco Sport with the 2.0L EcoBoost engine? Saddling this pretty great mini-ute with the 1.5L 3 cylinder is a shame and prevents me from even considering the Bronco Sport. To get the 2.0L, I have to go to the top of the range Badlands, adding at least 5k to the bottom line for stuff I don’t need or want. I eliminated a Silverado a few years ago because the decent engine, the 6.2L, was only available in the most expensive trim level, which I didn’t want. Ford was happy to build me an F-150 XL FX4 Supercab with the 3.5L EcoBoost and 3.73 axle. Now you’re doing what GM did. Stop it and take my 30k for a Big Bend 2.0L!

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Kruser: We had a Colt wagon it was… meh. But, perhaps it didn’t have a chance in comparison to the other...
  • Bike: You throw a lot of “facts” around old mate.
  • Bike: You throw a lot of “facts” around old mate.
  • dal20402: “Wages for most white collar jobs have been the same” This is emphatically not true in either...
  • slavuta: I feel he will not get to enjoy his new $$

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber