Heavy Metal: GM Invests Millions in Ohio
General Motors seems bent on preparing some of its existing facilities as supporting players for future programs. The company has announced a $46 million investment in the metal stamping operation in Parma, Ohio, a town located about 20 minutes south of Cleveland that has nothing to do with the tasty cheese one puts on their pasta.
The investment will be used for equipment upgrades and other preparations at the facility to support as-yet-unnamed future product programs. Currently, the Parma plant produces sheet metal stampings and assemblies for multiple GM product programs across all four brands – Chevy, Cadillac, Buick, and GMC. According to the company, renovations will begin immediately. If only contractors I’ve dealt with in the past were as prompt.
Roughly 1,000 employees work at Parma, with about 85 percent of them classed as hourly and represented by UAW Local 1005. The plant is said to process over 800 tons of steel per day and services or supports the majority of GM vehicles produced in North America. Manufacturing processes include press lines or multiple sizes, high-speed progressive presses, and GMNA’s largest stand-alone laser welding metal assembly operation of its type.
“Our Parma operation is a long-time leader in metal stamping capabilities and this investment reflects our confidence in the employees at Parma,” said Phil Kienle, GM vice president of North America Manufacturing and Labor Relations. “This investment will help the Parma team continue producing high quality, sheet metal stampings for a variety of future GM products.”
While no one at the company is willing to speak about what projects are in the hopper, it’s a safe bet to assume a good portion of the work will involve electric vehicles. After all, Cadillac has made it clear they plan to exist this decade as a purveyor of EVs, and all other GM brands are busying themselves with battery-powered vehicles of different shapes and sizes.
This investment is in addition to the $6 million GM committed to the facility roughly one year ago. That money was part and parcel of a larger effort with the Tonawanda engine plant in New York to help GM ramp up production of the highly profitable Silverado 1500 and Sierra 1500 pickup trucks. At Parma, the money was spent on new metal assembly cells, a sensible decision since the place is responsible for the majority of steel used in GM’s North American production.
Parma Metal Center has a long history as part of GM’s manufacturing efforts in this country, dating all the way back to 1948.
[Image: GM]
Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.
More by Matthew Guy
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Tassos Ask me if I care for the idiotic vehicles less than 10% of whose owners use as INTENDED.
- Brandon The 2024 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4Matic looks like a compelling addition to the luxury sedan market. From the drive notes, it’s clear that Mercedes-Benz has maintained its commitment to blending performance with comfort. The handling and acceleration seem impressive, reflecting Mercedes’ signature blend of power and smoothness.
- Jmanb52 In this case clearly a driver responsbile for the accident. Lawyer just trying to add confusion to jude and or jury to think about it. I was on a jury once for an auto accident and one of the attorneys tried a few stunts to shift blame. Same thing is happening here. The companies pushing autonamous want to deal with fleet markets like the autonamous taxi companies rather than individual consumers. In my opinion I think they belvie that would be more predictable sales. Car gets to xyz milage time to replace. In my opinion they could never sell a full autonamous car to an individual because of a back and forth legal battles between owner and maker when there is a crash. They need to foget about all these take over driver aids. It is just causing more issues than it could prevent.
- Jmanb52 Short answer is NO! It has been a tread for manufactures to basicaly glue a tablet to an area of the dash and call it an infotament system. However there is not one of us on here that doesn't ahve a smart phone or tablet. With the android auto, and the Apple Carplay and bluetooth that conencts car spekers and mic to our headset, do we even need an Infotament system or just bluetooth connection to use hands free mic and spearkers or wired connection to USB port for connection to spearkers / mic and charge the phone. So maybe the QOTD should be do manufactures even need to provide an infotanement system or should they just provide an in dash holder for a tablet or smartphone?
- Jmanb52 In the past year I did some more research on EVs. I already knew for years they were heavier than a ICE car of the same model / class. Like the F150 lightning can be 1000 LBS heavier than its ICE counterpart. In the last year I read more on the size of breaks, tires and other items that take more resrouces to create and polute more in their wear. This was another nail in my corporate EV caufin. I already didn't have much care for them due to my height (over 6 feet) and they all have a bad desgin, over dependency on gimics, over computerized driving experience. If I ever did get one it would be a low range in town only type vehicle that I would convert an older car. There is no manufacture making EVs that is worth a penny of my money.
Comments
Join the conversation
Note to TTAC. Having been involved in tooling up 25 plants in my career, I can tell you $45,000,000 is nothing. A drop in a bucket. In one way, i m glad to see the investment being made in USA manufacturing. But, the UAW is a blood sucking / efficiency draining org. I supervised 50 skilled trades men in my early career at 2 different plants and i can tell you they work about 4 hours a shift and work harder at screwing off than working.
Parma is a good plant. High quality & efficiency in internal reports 25 years ago