The Right Spec: 2022 Nissan Pathfinder

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Thanks to Nissan’s glacier-like design cycles, we don’t have to look very far back in the history books to find a so-called ‘real’ Pathfinder. Before it morphed into a three-row crossover that blended into the scenery, it was a body-on-frame rig with a proven engine and square-shouldered stance that didn’t apparently play well in the company’s corporate slide deck.

Except it probably should have. After all, Toyota is currently making bank with such a machine in the gotta-have-it 4Runner.

Our venerated Managing Editor sampled the new Pathfinder last month in the terrifying Detroit area, deeming it (the Nissan, not Detroit) to be a step – if not a leap – in the right direction. While it still packs a familiar 3.5L V6 engine, the miserable continuously variable automatic transmission has been binned in favor of a nine-speed automatic. This is true no matter which of the four trims are selected.

Ignoring the two-wheel-drive variants, prices range from $35,310 for a base model S trim all the way up to $48,090 for a Platinum-grade Pathfinder that actually contains no platinum whatsoever. Actually, scratch that; there might be some in the catalytic converter. We’ll hound the parts department and let you know. Nevertheless, spending more scratch nets absolutely not one iota of extra power, leaving us to judge the merits of various trims on their feature count.

We’ll dispense with the S right away since it fails to include conveniences like a remote starter and satellite radio. While it is true features like these make little difference to the majority of readers and authors at TTAC, they absolutely do make a difference to John & Jane Q. Public who are seeking an all-wheel-drive crossover to serve as a family shuttle. This puts us in league with the SV trim, which is $2,800 more expensive than the base car.

The SV also adds leather touchpoints and a set of power-adjustable seats with heating elements. ProPILOT Assist, the company’s take on advanced driver assistance tools, is included on the SV as well. Again, these are real-world comforts for the population that inexplicably doesn’t prefer a 2005 Ford Ranger as their go-to vehicle. However, making a further $3,400 jump to the SL trim just for basically leather seats and a bigger infotainment screen seems a bit silly.

Here’s a practical element we can all appreciate (even the ’05 Ranger crowd): the SV is rated to tow a burly-for-the-class 6,000 pounds, nearly double the base trim This difference alone is enough for your author to recommend SV as the bare minimum in a 2022 Pathfinder; just be sure to select the $2,170 option package that provides the transmission coolers to endure this task. The package also adds second-row captain’s chairs, a power liftgate that should really be standard, and a panoramic moonroof.

Please note the prices listed here are in American dollars and currently accurate for base prices exclusive of any fees, taxes, or rebates. Your dealer may (and should) sell for less. Keep your foot down, bone up on available rebates, and bargain hard.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Jul 16, 2021

    This thing is ugly, from the front, side, and rear. Our next vehicle, replacing our 202,000-mile Toyota Sienna, will likely be a 4wd 4Runner SR5.

  • Tankinbeans Tankinbeans on Jul 17, 2021

    Aside from the current corporate face of Nissan crossovers (dumb bi-level headlights - a trend which needs to die yesterday, and the buck-toothed grille), this is the least offensive thing they sell; it isn't gorgeous, but at least it's a box on wheels and isn't pretending otherwise. There still isn't a Nissan around that I would plunk down my money on. The move from a CVT is likely a good one.

  • Tassos Ask me if I care for the idiotic vehicles less than 10% of whose owners use as INTENDED.
  • Brandon The 2024 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4Matic looks like a compelling addition to the luxury sedan market. From the drive notes, it’s clear that Mercedes-Benz has maintained its commitment to blending performance with comfort. The handling and acceleration seem impressive, reflecting Mercedes’ signature blend of power and smoothness.
  • Jmanb52 In this case clearly a driver responsbile for the accident. Lawyer just trying to add confusion to jude and or jury to think about it. I was on a jury once for an auto accident and one of the attorneys tried a few stunts to shift blame. Same thing is happening here. The companies pushing autonamous want to deal with fleet markets like the autonamous taxi companies rather than individual consumers. In my opinion I think they belvie that would be more predictable sales. Car gets to xyz milage time to replace. In my opinion they could never sell a full autonamous car to an individual because of a back and forth legal battles between owner and maker when there is a crash. They need to foget about all these take over driver aids. It is just causing more issues than it could prevent.
  • Jmanb52 Short answer is NO! It has been a tread for manufactures to basicaly glue a tablet to an area of the dash and call it an infotament system. However there is not one of us on here that doesn't ahve a smart phone or tablet. With the android auto, and the Apple Carplay and bluetooth that conencts car spekers and mic to our headset, do we even need an Infotament system or just bluetooth connection to use hands free mic and spearkers or wired connection to USB port for connection to spearkers / mic and charge the phone. So maybe the QOTD should be do manufactures even need to provide an infotanement system or should they just provide an in dash holder for a tablet or smartphone?
  • Jmanb52 In the past year I did some more research on EVs. I already knew for years they were heavier than a ICE car of the same model / class. Like the F150 lightning can be 1000 LBS heavier than its ICE counterpart. In the last year I read more on the size of breaks, tires and other items that take more resrouces to create and polute more in their wear. This was another nail in my corporate EV caufin. I already didn't have much care for them due to my height (over 6 feet) and they all have a bad desgin, over dependency on gimics, over computerized driving experience. If I ever did get one it would be a low range in town only type vehicle that I would convert an older car. There is no manufacture making EVs that is worth a penny of my money.
Next