2022 Hyundai Staria People Mover Unveiled

Jason R. Sakurai
by Jason R. Sakurai

Inching closer to its mid-year debut, the 2022 Hyundai Staria multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) was revealed yesterday, with the premise of next-level mobility.

Minivan though it may be, at no point did Hyundai use this often-maligned vehicle classification. In the world of auto sales, it is the people mover that a family of four or more can hardly live without and that many parents dread for the stigma associated with them.

If you’ll recall, the MPV was Mazda’s minivan entry for more than 20 years, a hauler with some of the same ‘zoom-zoom’ zest found in other Mazdas. While the Staria isn’t absconding with the nameplate, they are happy to use it as a descriptor for something that’s clearly a minivan.

Hyundai has introduced a new term, purpose-built vehicles (PBVs) to somehow move the discussion away from minivans, and to these ‘new’ PBVs, if not in practice, well, at least as a point of reference.

What we know from Hyundai’s release yesterday is that there’s going to be a 2-seat Staria, which would make sense as a work vehicle, and in 7-, 9-, and 11-seat passenger configurations. There will be Premium versions, although the 11-seat Staria Premium is available only in Korea. The nine-seat Premium will have second-row seats with the ability to swivel 180-degrees, so that rousing conversations among occupants can take place while the vehicle is in motion.

When Hyundai compares the Staria to a cruise ship, you start thinking that maybe it’s going to be a boat. Without any dimensions, it’s hard to gauge whether the Staria is going to emulate the turning radius of a short school bus, or it will be a bit more nimble. There is a lot of glass, which compares nicely with that of a tour bus. Judging by the side view, think hunkered-down, low-to-the-ground Chevy Express/GMC Savana.

Futuristic though the front fascia may be due to its horizontal daytime running lights, and a lighted ‘halo’ Hyundai compares to the Earth’s horizon at sunrise if you were to view it from space, it’s very much like K.I.T.T. from the ‘Nightrider’ TV series, no? Its snub nose is somewhat reminiscent of the Toyota Previa minivan of twenty-odd years ago too, albeit with what we think will be a much longer body than that of the Toyota. But then again, it wasn’t in this era of personal space and social distancing that the Toyota was designed.

While there were no images of the dash and its 10.25-inch display screen, relaxation-mode premium seating in their 7-seat high-end variant, or the 64-color ambient mood lighting that’s available on all Staria Premium models, you now have some idea why Hyundai isn’t content to call it a minivan and leave it at that.

[Images: Hyundai, Toyota]

Jason R. Sakurai
Jason R. Sakurai

With a father who owned a dealership, I literally grew up in the business. After college, I worked for GM, Nissan and Mazda, writing articles for automotive enthusiast magazines as a side gig. I discovered you could make a living selling ad space at Four Wheeler magazine, before I moved on to selling TV for the National Hot Rod Association. After that, I started Roadhouse, a marketing, advertising and PR firm dedicated to the automotive, outdoor/apparel, and entertainment industries. Through the years, I continued writing, shooting, and editing. It keep things interesting.

More by Jason R. Sakurai

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • MaintenanceCosts In Toyota's hands, these hybrid powertrains with a single motor and a conventional automatic transmission have not been achieving the same kind of fuel economy benefits as the planetary-gear setups in the smaller cars. It's too bad. Many years ago GM did a group of full-size pickups and SUVs with a 6.0L V8 and a two-motor planetary gear system, and those got the fuel economy boost you'd expect while maintaining big-time towing capacity. Toyota should have done the same with its turbo four and six in the new trucks.
  • JMII My C7 isn't too bad maintain wise but it requires 10 quarts of expensive 0W-40 once a year (per GM) and tires are pricey due size and grip requirements. I average about $600 a year in maintenance but a majority of that is due to track usage. Brake fluid, brake pads and tires add up quickly. Wiper blades, coolant flush, transmission fluid, rear diff fluid and a new battery were the other costs. I bought the car in 2018 with 18k in mileage and now it has 42k. Many of the items mentioned are needed between 20k and 40k per GM's service schedule so my ownership period just happens to align with various intervals.I really need to go thru my service spreadsheet and put track related items on a separate tab to get a better picture of what "normal" cost would be. Its likely 75% of my spend is track related.Repairs to date are only $350. I needed a new XM antenna (aftermarket), a cargo net clip, a backup lamp switch and new LED side markers (aftermarket). The LEDs were the most expensive at $220.
  • Slavuta I drove it but previous style. Its big, with numb steering feel, and transmission that takes away from whatever the engine has.
  • Wjtinfwb Rivaled only by the Prowler and Thunderbird as retro vehicles that missed the mark... by a mile.
  • Wjtinfwb Tennessee is a Right to Work state. The UAW will have a bit less leverage there than in Michigan, which repealed R t W a couple years ago. And how much leverage will the UAW really have in Chattanooga. That plant builds ID. 4 and Atlas, neither of which are setting the world afire, sales wise. I'd have thought VW would have learned the UAW plays by different rules than the placid German unions from the Westmoreland PA debacle. But history has shown VW to be exceptionally slow learners. Watching with interest.
Next