2020 Nissan Titan Pro-4X Review: Still Playing Catchup

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey
Fast Facts

2020 Nissan Titan PRO-4X Fast Facts

5.6-liter V8 (400 horsepower @ 5,800 rpm; 413 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm)
Nine-speed automatic, part-time four-wheel drive
15 city / 21 highway / 17 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
15.1 city, 11.2 highway, 13.3 combined. (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
Base Price
$49,790 (U.S) / $69,998 (Canada)
As Tested
$60,180 (U.S.) / $70,163 (Canada)
Prices include $1,595 destination charge in the United States and $2,060 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared.

On the face of it, the redesigned 2020 Nissan Titan is a fine truck.

The 5.6-liter V8 packs enough punch for around-town driving – and presumably for hauling and towing, though I had no chance to do either during my time behind the wheel – and the all-new nine-speed automatic helps bring the aging Titan in line with the modern truck world.

It rides and handles, well, like a truck, but still on the acceptable side. The interior is pleasant.

If I needed to rent a truck for a day to schlepp some stuff around town, I’d not object if the underpaid rental clerk brought one around.

And yet.

Nissan is suffering from the same syndrome as General Motors, in that it has built a darn fine truck that still feels insufficient to play with the big boys in the segment. Those big boys, of course, are the Ram 1500 and Ford F-150.

The situation isn’t exactly the same as with GM – the GM trucks suffer from questionable exterior and interior styling decisions, while the Nissan’s design is just fine, at least in terms of aesthetics. The problem here is that nothing really stands out as an attention-grabbing feature that the competition either doesn’t have or doesn’t do as well.

There’s no big infotainment screen with clever customization, a la Ram. None of the trickeration and “look at me” stuff that Ford dropped on the 2021 F-150 (the fold-down shifter, for example).

In terms of ice cream flavors, the Ram and Ford are deluxe indulgences like Mackinac Island fudge or moose tracks, while the GM trucks are rocky road. The Titan is vanilla. Meanwhile, Toyota’s Tundra is a discontinued flavor.

Vanilla can be very good when done right, of course. That does sound a bit like damning with faint praise, I suppose, but the Titan is pretty unobjectionable, as long as you set expectations accordingly. It’s still a truck, after all.

For example, you do get some bounciness on rough pavement with an unladen bed, and while that means the Titan loses out to Ram and Ford in ride quality, it’s still within acceptable bounds for a full-size pick-em-up truck.

Perhaps the best thing about this truck is the 5.6. It’s pretty smooth, and 400 horsepower and 413 lb-ft of torque are nothing to sneeze at.

Inside, the cabin isn’t as visually interesting as what’s on offer from Auburn Hills or Dearborn, instead working off the philosophy of function first. Controls are easy to reach and laid out in a logical fashion, while the gauges have large, legible numbers. Boring but easy to use isn’t a bad way to approach cabin design.

Plain but still handsome isn’t a poor approach to exterior design, either. That’s what you get here – a burly, rugged look with slightly softened lines in some spots. It looks as tough as any other truck, and the blacked-out grille gives the PRO-4X trim some flare, though the Titan doesn’t turn heads the way a Ram might.

Today’s trucks are quite feature-laden, and the PRO-4X is positioned as the off-roader of the lineup. The 4×4 features include shift-on-the-fly four-wheel drive, Bilstein off-road shocks, and electronic locking rear differential.

Other standard features include 18-inch wheels, automatic emergency braking with pedestrian detection, all-terrain tires, rear automatic braking, lane-departure warning with haptic steering, traffic-sign recognition, blind-spot warning, rear cross-traffic alert, intelligent forward-collision warning, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, navigation, USB, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi hotspot, satellite radio, intelligent cruise control, driver-alert system, keyless entry and starting, LED lighting, fog lamps, front tow hooks, spray-on bedliner, and rain-sensing wipers.

That put my loaner’s base price just under $50K. A PRO-4X Utility Package added parking sensors, power sliding rear window, Fender audio, electronically locking tailgate, and other features for $2,190. A PRO-4X Convenience Package added leather seats, heated front seats and steering wheel, power tilt/telescope steering column, 360-degree camera, remote start, and more for $3,390.

A PRO-4X Moonroof Package adds a dual-pane moonroof and cooled front seats for $1,490. A Protection Package that adds an off-road adventure kit, medic kit, and all-season floor mats cost $390. Add $285 mudflaps and $1,050 running boards plus the $1,595 destination charge, and you have a $60,180 truck.

One that is pretty good, but already feels inferior to two of the Detroit Three.

Pretty good will be good enough for some truck buyers. But probably not enough for Nissan, especially factoring in the intense loyalty that some truck owners show towards their preferred brands.

If Nissan is serious about titanic conquests, this is a good start, but it’s simply not enough.

[Images © 2021 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 31 comments
  • Tonycd Tonycd on Mar 18, 2021

    Setting aside the knee-slapper about the Tundra being nonexistent, there's one very important thing it still delivers better than any competitor: reliability. That's very important to some people. Nissan can't say that. And at $49k they can't hang their hat on price, either.

    • See 2 previous
    • Jh26036 Jh26036 on Mar 19, 2021

      @CKNSLS Sierra SLT It'll make up for it in absurd resale value.

  • Thehyundaigarage Thehyundaigarage on Mar 20, 2021

    We have a 2016 Titan Diesel Pro-4X as our second vehicle. We bought it second hand for a song, and it does everything we need a truck to do. The diesel is nice for towing through the mountains when we visit family in BC, and it’s been very reliable. Overall we’re very happy with it, as for the 21K Canadian we payed we can overlook a lot of its shortcomings. But anyone who bought one new for the price they were must have been mentally ill... The interior quality reminds me of a 1990’s Lada. No joke, it’s THAT bad.

  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next