Nikola Embarrassed After Internal Review, Now Downsizing

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The outside firm Nikola hired to conduct the internal investigation looking into the validity of claims made by ousted founder Trevor Milton has reached a conclusion. Milton does appear to have been fabricating the status of the company’s technology and how far along its prototypes were. But Nikola wasn’t helping and ended up being implicated in a few falsehoods of its own.

Some wealthy individual lying to a sea of people for the sake of making money is hardly news, however. The entire world runs on politicians and business people going back on promises made months earlier and clarifying statements that never seem to illuminate anything. What makes Milton’s offense so bad is that he seems to have used the power of lying to mislead investors who might have otherwise made money. Nikola shares never truly recovered from the exposé published by Hindenburg Research as part of its plan to short the company, and those who never bothered to question the legitimacy of its technical claims before investing are suddenly very interested in knowing everything about the business.

By the time Nikola was getting into the reverse merger with VectoIQ, a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), as a way to make sure their IPO was swinging for the fences, we thought its market valuation was absolutely insane. But we didn’t learn how much investors had missed the mark until after the Hindenburg report got the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) hot and bothered.

Nikola initially denied the claims of fraud made against it, but Milton still left the company in September. It was then announced that the business would be hiring an impartial team to conduct an internal probe that would get to the bottom of everything. Unfortunately, their findings seem unlikely to usher Nikola out of its current jam. According to Bloomberg, both the company and its founder will have more explaining to do.

From Bloomberg:

The company’s internal review found the questionable assertions — seven of which were made by Milton and two by Nikola — were “inaccurate in whole or in part, when made,” according to the filing.

The misleading statements included a December 2016 claim by Milton that one of Nikola’s first prototypes, the Nikola One, was a fully-functioning vehicle. Bloomberg News reported in June that Milton had greatly exaggerated the capabilities of the truck. It could not be driven at the time it was shown publicly because of missing parts, according to people familiar with the matter.

The business also seems to have overblown claims about its ability to reliably produce hydrogen and ownership rights to natural gas wells. It’s the sort of thought that leaves one scratching their head because the people in charge had to know that this would catch up with them eventually. Maybe the internal probe was less about uncovering truths then getting Nikola to further distance itself from Milton.

Both he and the company have been issued grand jury subpoenas, the kind that foreshadow criminal investigations, from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the N.Y. County District Attorney’s Office. Reports have indicated that Nikola is paying $8.1 million in attorney fees for Milton as part if its corporate indemnification agreement with him. While just part of the $27.5 million it spent last year to fund its legal defense, it represents a very small fraction of what it is likely to incur this year. Keep in mind that things didn’t really kick off in earnest until late into the fall of 2020.

As you might imagine, this has forced Nikola to reassess the situation. On Thursday, the company announced it had lost $384.3 million last year, with the biggest hit coming in the forth quarter. That, combined with the ongoing semiconductor and battery shortages have apparently required it to lower expectations. For example, the super-advanced Tre semitruck that was supposed to see 600 deliveries this year is now estimated to be somewhere between 50 and 100 units.

“The pandemic has caused significant supply chain disruptions,” Nikola CEO Mark Russell said during the earnings call, adding that additional downsizing had helped stabilize the business. “We now believe Nikola is in the best position the company has ever been to execute on our core business plan.”

[Image: Nikola]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • Akear Akear on Feb 27, 2021

    Even short-term Barra eventually discovered Nikola is not a valid company. Has this company even produced a single vehicle that has been sold? A better name for them should be Ponzi motors.

  • Stuki Stuki on Mar 01, 2021

    Those who can, build. Trucks with competitive utility. At competitive prices. While those who can't..., eh, do, like: "getting into the reverse merger with VectoIQ, a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), as a way to make sure their IPO was swinging for the fences" instead...... But hey, it's America. In the financialized, hence dystopian, era. Where no wealth, at all, whatsoever, is earned. And where all is instead redistributed to rank nothings of the above kind. From productive people. By central banks. Without any exception. Whatsoever. Hence, unsurprisingly: Instead of being directed at building competitive trucks at competitive prices, "our" scarce resources and capital, is instead directed fully, 100%, by utter and abject retards on nothing but Fed welfare. And hence, directed towards the only things such illiterate garbage knows how to. As in: "getting into the reverse merger with VectoIQ, a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), as a way to make sure their IPO was swinging for the fences"

  • ChristianWimmer I have two problems with autonomous cars.One, I LOVE and ENJOY DRIVING. It’s a fun and pleasurable experience for me. I want to drive my cars, not be driven by them.Two, if autonomous cars have been engineered to a standard where they work 100% flawlessly and don’t cause accidents, then freedom-hating governments like the POS European Union or totally idiotic current German government can literally make laws which ban private car ownership in their quest to save the world from climate change bla bla bla…
  • SCE to AUX Everything in me says 'no', but the price is tempting, and it's only 2 hours from me.I guess 123k miles in 18 years does qualify as 'low miles'.
  • Dwford Will we ever actually have autonomous vehicles? Right now we have limited consumer grade systems that require constant human attention, or we have commercial grade systems that still rely on remote operators and teams of chase vehicles. Aside from Tesla's FSD, all these systems work only in certain cities or highway routes. A common problem still remains: the system's ability to see and react correctly to obstacles. Until that is solved, count me out. Yes, I could also react incorrectly, but at least the is me taking my fate into my own hands, instead of me screaming in terror as the autonomous vehicles rams me into a parked semi
  • Sayahh I do not know how my car will respond to the trolley problem, but I will be held liable whatever it chooses to do or not do. When technology has reached Star Trek's Data's level of intelligence, I will trust it, so long as it has a moral/ethic/empathy chip/subroutine; I would not trust his brother Lore driving/controlling my car. Until then, I will drive it myself until I no longer can, at which time I will call a friend, a cab or a ride-share service.
  • Daniel J Cx-5 lol. It's why we have one. I love hybrids but the engine in the RAV4 is just loud and obnoxious when it fires up.
Next