Nikola Embarrassed After Internal Review, Now Downsizing

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The outside firm Nikola hired to conduct the internal investigation looking into the validity of claims made by ousted founder Trevor Milton has reached a conclusion. Milton does appear to have been fabricating the status of the company’s technology and how far along its prototypes were. But Nikola wasn’t helping and ended up being implicated in a few falsehoods of its own.

Some wealthy individual lying to a sea of people for the sake of making money is hardly news, however. The entire world runs on politicians and business people going back on promises made months earlier and clarifying statements that never seem to illuminate anything. What makes Milton’s offense so bad is that he seems to have used the power of lying to mislead investors who might have otherwise made money. Nikola shares never truly recovered from the exposé published by Hindenburg Research as part of its plan to short the company, and those who never bothered to question the legitimacy of its technical claims before investing are suddenly very interested in knowing everything about the business.

By the time Nikola was getting into the reverse merger with VectoIQ, a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), as a way to make sure their IPO was swinging for the fences, we thought its market valuation was absolutely insane. But we didn’t learn how much investors had missed the mark until after the Hindenburg report got the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) hot and bothered.

Nikola initially denied the claims of fraud made against it, but Milton still left the company in September. It was then announced that the business would be hiring an impartial team to conduct an internal probe that would get to the bottom of everything. Unfortunately, their findings seem unlikely to usher Nikola out of its current jam. According to Bloomberg, both the company and its founder will have more explaining to do.

From Bloomberg:

The company’s internal review found the questionable assertions — seven of which were made by Milton and two by Nikola — were “inaccurate in whole or in part, when made,” according to the filing.

The misleading statements included a December 2016 claim by Milton that one of Nikola’s first prototypes, the Nikola One, was a fully-functioning vehicle. Bloomberg News reported in June that Milton had greatly exaggerated the capabilities of the truck. It could not be driven at the time it was shown publicly because of missing parts, according to people familiar with the matter.

The business also seems to have overblown claims about its ability to reliably produce hydrogen and ownership rights to natural gas wells. It’s the sort of thought that leaves one scratching their head because the people in charge had to know that this would catch up with them eventually. Maybe the internal probe was less about uncovering truths then getting Nikola to further distance itself from Milton.

Both he and the company have been issued grand jury subpoenas, the kind that foreshadow criminal investigations, from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the N.Y. County District Attorney’s Office. Reports have indicated that Nikola is paying $8.1 million in attorney fees for Milton as part if its corporate indemnification agreement with him. While just part of the $27.5 million it spent last year to fund its legal defense, it represents a very small fraction of what it is likely to incur this year. Keep in mind that things didn’t really kick off in earnest until late into the fall of 2020.

As you might imagine, this has forced Nikola to reassess the situation. On Thursday, the company announced it had lost $384.3 million last year, with the biggest hit coming in the forth quarter. That, combined with the ongoing semiconductor and battery shortages have apparently required it to lower expectations. For example, the super-advanced Tre semitruck that was supposed to see 600 deliveries this year is now estimated to be somewhere between 50 and 100 units.

“The pandemic has caused significant supply chain disruptions,” Nikola CEO Mark Russell said during the earnings call, adding that additional downsizing had helped stabilize the business. “We now believe Nikola is in the best position the company has ever been to execute on our core business plan.”

[Image: Nikola]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • Akear Akear on Feb 27, 2021

    Even short-term Barra eventually discovered Nikola is not a valid company. Has this company even produced a single vehicle that has been sold? A better name for them should be Ponzi motors.

  • Stuki Stuki on Mar 01, 2021

    Those who can, build. Trucks with competitive utility. At competitive prices. While those who can't..., eh, do, like: "getting into the reverse merger with VectoIQ, a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), as a way to make sure their IPO was swinging for the fences" instead...... But hey, it's America. In the financialized, hence dystopian, era. Where no wealth, at all, whatsoever, is earned. And where all is instead redistributed to rank nothings of the above kind. From productive people. By central banks. Without any exception. Whatsoever. Hence, unsurprisingly: Instead of being directed at building competitive trucks at competitive prices, "our" scarce resources and capital, is instead directed fully, 100%, by utter and abject retards on nothing but Fed welfare. And hence, directed towards the only things such illiterate garbage knows how to. As in: "getting into the reverse merger with VectoIQ, a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), as a way to make sure their IPO was swinging for the fences"

  • Alan Well, it will take 30 years to fix Nissan up after the Renault Alliance reduced Nissan to a paltry mess.I think Nissan will eventually improve.
  • Alan This will be overpriced for what it offers.I think the "Western" auto manufacturers rip off the consumer with the Thai and Chinese made vehicles.A Chinese made Model 3 in Australia is over $70k AUD(for 1995 $45k USD) which is far more expensive than a similar Chinesium EV of equal or better quality and loaded with goodies.Chinese pickups are $20k to $30k cheaper than Thai built pickups from Ford and the Japanese brands. Who's ripping who off?
  • Alan Years ago Jack Baruth held a "competition" for a piece from the B&B on the oddest pickup story (or something like that). I think 5 people were awarded the prizes.I never received mine, something about being in Australia. If TTAC is global how do you offer prizes to those overseas or are we omitted on the sly from competing?In the end I lost significant respect for Baruth.
  • Alan My view is there are good vehicles from most manufacturers that are worth looking at second hand.I can tell you I don't recommend anything from the Chrysler/Jeep/Fiat/etc gene pool. Toyotas are overly expensive second hand for what they offer, but they seem to be reliable enough.I have a friend who swears by secondhand Subarus and so far he seems to not have had too many issue.As Lou stated many utes, pickups and real SUVs (4x4) seem quite good.
  • 28-Cars-Later So is there some kind of undiagnosed disease where every rando thinks their POS is actually valuable?83K miles Ok.new valve cover gasket.Eh, it happens with age. spark plugsOkay, we probably had to be kewl and put in aftermarket iridium plugs, because EVO.new catalytic converterUh, yeah that's bad at 80Kish. Auto tranny failing. From the ad: the SST fails in one of the following ways:Clutch slip has turned into; multiple codes being thrown, shifting a gear or 2 in manual mode (2-3 or 2-4), and limp mode.Codes include: P2733 P2809 P183D P1871Ok that's really bad. So between this and the cat it suggests to me someone jacked up the car real good hooning it, because EVO, and since its not a Toyota it doesn't respond well to hard abuse over time.$20,000, what? Pesos? Zimbabwe Dollars?Try $2,000 USD pal. You're fracked dude, park it in da hood and leave the keys in it.BONUS: Comment in the ad: GLWS but I highly doubt you get any action on this car what so ever at that price with the SST on its way out. That trans can be $10k + to repair.
Next