Rare Rides: The Spectacular Original Ford Taurus From 1987

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis
We’re committed to finding, researching, and recommending the best products. We earn commissions from purchases you make using links in our articles. Learn more here
rare rides the spectacular original ford taurus from 1987

Rare Rides has covered earlier variants of the Taurus twice in prior entries, with a sparkling SHO from 1990 and the one-off Sable cabriolet from 1989.

Today we go further back in history, and look at an excellently preserved 1987 Taurus LX.

By the early Eighties, things were changing across the American automobile landscape. Japanese offerings were gaining traction, downsizing was de rigueur, and front-wheel drive platforms were a siren’s song from the future. Customers and the government also made a point to care about fuel economy, which meant the implementation of more aerodynamic styling. Specific to its case, Ford was also losing money big time. Losses of $3 billion accumulated between 1979 and 1982.

Given the above, Ford realized it needed an innovative, quality made, clean-sheet replacement for one of the most important segments of the era: the midsize family sedan. The Taurus project started in the early Eighties, and Ford shelled out billions of dollars on its new mainstream idea. By 1985 the Taurus was production-ready. LTD out, Taurus in!

The new car was kept almost fully under wraps until it was previewed in 1985. Curious Ford customers who visited the showroom to check out the new-for-’86 Taurus were delighted with the modern car presented to them. Taurus and its slightly more fancy (and lightbar) sibling the Mercury Sable were offered in sedan and wagon variants, and all shared the same 106-inch wheelbase. Powering all first-gen DN5 platform cars were three different engines. At the bottom end was a 2.5-liter inline-four, available only through 1990. A 3.0-liter Vulcan V6 was optional in sedans, but standard in wagons through 1990. Top of the line was the 3.8-liter Essex V6, but it was not available until 1988. The 3.8 became the standard engine for the wagon in ’88, but always remained an option for Taurus sedan. Separate for SHO only was the 3.0-liter SHO V6, by Yamaha. The vast majority of non-SHO Taurus models were equipped with a three- or four-speed automatic depending on model and year.

However, Ford intended Taurus to appeal to a wide price audience. A base MT-5 trim featured minimal equipment, mandatory four-cylinder engine, and a five-speed manual. That model proved very unpopular and was dropped after 1988. The lowest common trim Taurus was the L, while the midlevel GL garnered the largest share of sales. Top of the line was the LX, which was never offered with a four-cylinder engine.

Taurus was an instant hit and shifted over 236,000 examples in its first model year. That number was the lowest sales year, and by the end of the first model’s run in 1991, Ford racked up over 2,000,000 sales of the Taurus. The Sable chipped in with another 669,000 sales. An incredibly important car for Ford and the family car class, Taurus made a lasting impression on the car industry and set several precedents for the family sedan.

Today’s time machine Rare Ride was available for less than 24 hours on Craigslist in Detroit. Owned until very recently by its original owner (a Ford engineer), it has just 99,000 miles. In spectacular condition – especially considering its location – the LX asked $2,400. Pictures here.

H/t to former TTAC contributor Sajeev Mehta for posting this Rare Ride on Facebook.

[Images: Ford]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Writing things for TTAC since late 2016 from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio. You can find me on Twitter @CoreyLewis86, and I also contribute at Forbes Wheels.

More by Corey Lewis

Join the conversation
2 of 55 comments
  • Mor2bz Mor2bz on Jan 16, 2021

    Reliable car to 100k mi., then, not so much. nice riding and handling. judge the looks for yourself. That will be my last Ford.

  • 18726543 18726543 on Jan 18, 2021

    My first car (the hand-me-down, not the first car I ever bought) was a 1989 Taurus. It was purchased used from a local buy-here-pay-here in about 1994 I think. My parents were deciding between the '89 Taurus and an '87 Maxima that was also on the lot. I often think about how things would've been different had they chosen the Maxima. I started driving the car in 1998 when I turned 16. It had the 3.8L and every single option you could get except the SHO engine. It had the digital dash with MPH/KPH button, speed alarm (to set a chime if you passed a certain speed), inflatable lumbar support, climate control...you name it, it had it. I think I acquired the car with about 90k miles on it and it had already blown a head gasket by then. The trans was fine though. The bassist in my band drove an '03 for many years and commuted up and down I-270 in it daily despite it pushing 230k miles. It was in rough shape with the typical broken rear springs and abysmal exterior appearance. He took absolute minimal care of the vehicle and it just kept on going which was lucky for him because the list of repairs he could actually afford pretty much ended at "headlight bulb". He eventually wound up trading it in on a 2013 Rogue. I didn't ask what he paid, but I'm sure he got taken by a very long payment term.

  • 285exp If the conversion to EVs was really so vital to solve an existential climate change crisis, it wouldn’t matter whether they were built by US union workers or where the batteries and battery materials came from.
  • El scotto Another EBPosky, "EVs are Stoopid, prove to me water freezes at 0 degrees Celsius" article.It was never explained if the rural schools own the buses or if the school bus routes are contracted out. If the bus routes are contracted out, will Carpenter or Bluebird offer an electric school bus? Flexmatt never stated the range of brand-unspecified school bus. Will the min-mart be open at the end of the 179-mile drive? No cell coverage? Why doesn't the bus driver have an emergency sat phone?Two more problems Mr. Musk could solve.
  • RICK Long time Cadillac admirer with 89 Fleetwood Brougham deElegance and 93 Brougham, always liked Eldorado until downsized after 76. Those were the days. Sad to see what now wears Cadillac name.
  • Carsofchaos Bike lanes are in use what maybe 10 to 12 hours a day? The other periods of the day they aren't in use whatsoever. A bike can carry one person and a vehicle can carry multiple people. It's very simple math to figure out that a bike lane in no way shape or form will handle more people than cars will.The bigger issue is double parked delivery vehicles. They are often double parked and taking up lanes because there are cars parked on the curb. You combine that with a bike lane and pedestrians Crossing wherever they feel like it and it's a recipe for disaster. I think if we could just go back to two lanes of traffic things would flow much better. I started coming to the city in 2003 before a lot of these bike lanes were implemented and the traffic is definitely much worse now than it was back then. Sadly at this point I don't really think there is a solution but I can guarantee that congestion pricing will not fix this problem.
  • Charles When I lived in Los Angeles I saw a 9-5 a few times and instanly admired the sweeping low slug aerodynamic jet tech influenced lines and all that beautiful glass. The car was very different from what I expected from a Saab even though the 900 Turbo was nice. A casual lady friend had a Saab Sonnet, never drove or rode in it but nonetheless chilled my enthusiasm and I eventually forgot about Saabs. In the following years I have had seven Mercedes's, three or four Jaguars even two Daimlers both the 250 V-8 and the massive and powerful Majestic Major. Daily drivers of a brand new 300ZX 2+2 and Lincolns, plus a few diesel trucks. Having moved to my big farm in central New York, trucks and SUV's are the standard, even though I have a Mercedes S500 in one of my barns. Due to circumstances with my Ford Explorer and needing a second driver I found the 2006 9-5 locally. Very little surface rust, none undercarriage, original owner, garage kept, wife driver and all the original literature and a ton of paid receipts and history. The car just turned 200,000 miles and I love it. Feels new like I'm back in my Nissan 300ZX with a lot more European class and ready power with the awesome turbo. So fun to drive, the smooth power and torque is incredible! Great price paid to justify going through the car and giving her everything she needs, i.e., new tires, battery, all shocks, struts, control arms, timing chain and rust removable to come, plus more. The problem now is I want to restore it and likely put it in my concrete barn and only drive in good weather. As to the writer, Alex Dykes, I take great exception calling the 9-5 Saab "ugly," finding myself looking back at her beauty and uniqueness. Moreover, I get new looks from others not quite recognizing, like the days out west with my more expensive European cars. There are Saabs eclipsing 300K rourinely and one at a million miles and I believe one car with 500K on the original engine. So clearly, this is a keeper, in love already with my SportCombi. I want to be in that elite club.