Pennsylvania Dealer Group Accused of PPP Fraud, Extorting Cash From Staff

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
pennsylvania dealer group accused of ppp fraud extorting cash from staff

When the United States announced it would be offering payroll relief to the countless small businesses it impacted with government shutdowns intended to combat COVID-19 earlier this year, everyone breathed a sigh of relief into their mask. Unfortunately, the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) became a confusing bureaucratic mess almost instantly. It wasn’t clear how companies would account for part-time or contracted employees, numerous banks denied help to those with less than stellar financial histories, and the application website repeatedly crashed — which was awful for a service that was designed to accommodate candidates on a first-come-first-serve basis.

There were also numerous provisions that allowed big business to take advantage if their individual locations were small enough and loopholes for companies that weren’t even required to shut down operations. Criticisms understandably began to surface, followed by months of commercials asking concerned citizens to report instances of fraud. One such example came into focus this week after a former sales representative for a Pennsylvania-based dealership group launched a federal lawsuit against their ex-employer alleging that it had violated the False Claims Act in relation to PPP.

While Automotive News estimated U.S. car dealerships received between $7.6 billion and $11.89 billion in PPP in the second quarter of 2020, likely saving at least 740,000 jobs, it also used data compiled data from the Small Business Association (SBA) to explain some of the inconsistencies it had seen between applicants. This week, it also highlighted the case in Pennsylvania.

The lawsuit, filed in July by Branden Bucher and unsealed in U.S. Middle District Court in Pennsylvania late in November, said Blaise Alexander Inc. and the group’s 20 stores applied for a minimum of 13 PPP loans and received between $4.65 million and $11.1 million from the SBA. Data released by the Small Business Administration last week confirmed that the matter, showing 13 Blaise Alexander entities with Pennsylvania addresses accepting $6,945,700 in government loans.

While that doesn’t necessarily mean it has acted illegally, the suit claims the dealer group should never have been eligible due to its size. The Blaise Alexander group is reported to have more than 1,200 employees (SBA reports closer to 750) but PPP restricts access to forgivable loans to firms with fewer than 500. And here’s where things start getting weird. Initially, the language in the relief bill made it seem as though franchise owners with fewer than 500 employees per location were eligible. But the lawsuit takes a major detour when it accuses the dealer group of actively forcing the sales team to reimburse it for the PPP funds by withholding sales commissions.

From Automotive News:

“[Blaise Alexander’s] conduct undermines a core purpose of the CARES Act — to put money in the pockets of employees,” the lawsuit said.

Joel Breneman, director of operations for the dealership group, told the newspaper that employees were not asked to return any wages that they received.

“I can confidently say that these allegations are false and this is an attempt by an individual to benefit from a frivolous suit,” Breneman said.

A dealership spokeswoman contacted by Automotive News declined to comment. Bucher’s lawyers did not respond to requests for comment.

While the alleged employee reimbursement plan is a new trick, Blaise Alexander is hardly the first company to be accused of PPP fraud. Neyra Motor Cars of Cincinnati was also accused of PPP loan fraud by a former sales representative in October. But automotive dealerships were among the largest recipients of COVID-related funding in 2020, making them prime targets for anybody hunting for financial misdoings. Meanwhile, the whole of the automotive industry had taken in an estimated $132 billion in government loans by July, with numerous entities being forced to give some of that back after people became outraged. For example, both AutoNation and Penske Automotive applied for PPP and took heat for it for being so large. Though it could be argued that they did indeed need the money, especially after the layoffs commenced.

[Image: LM Photos/Shutterstock]

Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Woodywrkng Woodywrkng on Dec 07, 2020

    Meanwhile, Donald Trump and Jared Kushner received 3.65 million dollars in PPP loans. They're small businesses you know.

  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Dec 07, 2020

    Say it isn't so, a dishonest car dealership.

  • Kwik_Shift It was an annoying feature on my 2018 Nissan Sentra SV. Bugs, leaves and snow would disable it. Should have been a better design .
  • Master Baiter A regulator's job is never done, so yeah, bring on the next level of regulations.
  • DedBull The automatic braking system in my wife's 2019 Tiguan is easily defeated by the slightest amount of solid precipitation, which is not uncommon here in western Pennsylvania. Fortunately we have regular speed-holding cruise control, because the active cruise control uses the same sensor and becomes inactive in the same conditions. It was infuriating in our loaner. I've had a few false-positives over the years, plus a couple where it didn't like my rate of deceleration. Interestingly it did not intervene at all when I had a deer strike a couple years ago. I don't mind the application of the tech, but I think they are setting a pretty high bar going forward. I'm also cautious of over-reliance on tech in vehicles.
  • FreedMike The AEB system on my car has actually engaged only once in the two years I've owned it, mainly because I actually pay attention. But not everyone does...thus, this proposal. If everyone was as diligent as I am, I'd say there's no need, but we all know how that movie ends.if it keeps some moron in a Tahoe who's busy f**king around on TikTok from laying waste to my car from behind, I'm all for it.
  • Lou_BC I've seen photo's of plates that spell "azzhole" when viewed in the rear view mirror. There was a fellow in Canada who's last name was "Grabher". They wouldn't let him have that plate.