Report: Automotive Industry Borrows $132 Billion Through Pandemic

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The automotive industry has borrowed an estimated $132 billion since the world started taking the coronavirus more seriously, according to a recent analysis by Bloomberg.

Despite migrating around the planet months before anyone thought to close down a single airport or suggest masks were necessary, March is broadly viewed as the start of the pandemic in the Western World, as that’s when most governments started taking direct action and businesses started looking for handouts. Still, it’s exceptionally difficult to follow the money if you didn’t devote yourself entirely to the task of tracking payments while under shelter-in-place orders.

We do know that a lot of money was being thrown around, however. Car dealerships were among the largest recipients of Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) funds in the United States, garnering anywhere from $7.5 billion to $12 billion in government aid to maintain staff. Plenty of criticism over exactly where that money went arose as the press questioned which businesses were more deserving and who was just taking advantage of the system.

But it’s only the tip of the iceberg. PPP funds don’t need to repaid unless they weren’t earmarked entirely for payroll purposes; the government also used the program to send over $600 billion to support banks in extending low-interest loans to companies during the pandemic. The automotive industry was one of the largest beneficiaries of that arrangement.

The dismal financial reports coming from most manufacturers this month would suggest they were in desperate need of the cash. Government lockdowns effectively ended the industry’s ability to do business as production facilities and sales centers closed, forcing major players to dip into their (often sizable) cash reserves. But with the promise of easier terms from lenders, many figured borrowing wasn’t a half-bad idea.

According to the study, the total amount consists of $79 billion in new loans and another $53 billion in drawdowns from existing credit lines. Facilities linked to the pandemic were said to account for almost 80 percent of overall loan borrowings by the auto sector in the year to date.

From Bloomberg:

Loans for virus relief, which peaked during the March-to-June period, eased this month to less than $100 million as some companies began paying down their loans.

Ford Motor is the latest company to repay part of revolving facility drawn previously, according to an Bloomberg News report earlier this week.

The automaker said Thursday its second-quarter operating loss was less than half the $5 billion deficit it had predicted, due mainly to strong demand for its SUVs and trucks.

French parts supplier Faurecia sold a bond this week to repay its 800 million euro ($949 million) club loan from April.

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles also paid down drawdown portions of its 3.5 billion euro revolver with a bond early this month.

However, plenty of companies, usually smaller parts suppliers with less cash reserves, have asked for clemency on loan agreements as the pandemic continues ripping them to shreds. Bloomberg cited Samvardhana Motherson Automotive Systems and turbocharger supplier Garrett Motion as examples — both of which have a large pool of employees but smaller cash reserves to endure a financial crisis.

That’s important to remember in this. While the $132 billion sum sounds insane on the surface, it’s spread out across a vast industry that employs large portions of several countries. That makes it seem substantially less troublesome overall, albeit still a huge amount of money. It would still be nice to know exactly how favorable some of the terms were, since governments around the globe took direct action to help banks make more loans possible. Deciding exactly how much was necessary and who was actually in need will be a tall order, though — especially since that has to be done after the fact.

[Image: Minerva Studio/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Starskeptic Starskeptic on Aug 03, 2020

    That mask is one of the worst photo-shops I've ever seen - it looks like two half masks spliced together...

  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Aug 03, 2020

    For those loans which must be repaid, I wonder precisely how they will be repaid. The New Normal Economy tells me that if your business doesn't rebound to pre-pandemic levels, you may not be able to repay to loan.

  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
Next