2021 Nissan Armada Gets Much Less Ugly, Way More Tech

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Japan’s most downtrodden legacy automaker that isn’t Mitsubishi appears ready to take the fight to its global rivals, at least as far as the full-sized sport-utility segment is concerned. Nissan has refreshed its colossus from tip to tail for the 2021 model year, resulting in an SUV that’s decidedly more modern (and hopefully competitive) than most people probably thought possible.

Nissan’s Armada is an interesting car often that’s difficult to recommend. While truly massive and incredibly comfortable, it’s hard to suggest over any of its full-size opponents — most of which are substantially more compliant at cruising speeds. The Armada may have the best-in-class standard towing and horsepower, thanks largely to its obligatory 5.6-liter V8, but the overall experience is a mixed bag. Fortunately, Nissan is issuing updates specifically designed to smooth its rough edges for 2021.

The SUV excels at leisurely trips around town, especially if the village is due some roadway maintenance. However, that advantage vanishes from behind the wheel once motorists are forced to interface with the previous Armada’s ancient multimedia system or notice that it has a propensity to wander at expressway speeds. While manageable (especially if you’re as accustomed to piloting oversized and ancient platforms), its slow steering doesn’t inspire much confidence. But there are few mainstream vehicles I would rather see appear as my next Uber, since the passenger experience is rather good.

The 2021 model year sees revamped styling vaguely reminiscent of the previous-generation Ford Expedition with just enough modernity to keep it from looking terribly dated. It’s a basic and inoffensive design incorporating an updated V-motion grille, new headlamps with modern running lights, and some wheels. Taillights have also been modernized to complement the Armada’s redesigned rear bumper and the company’s revamped logo design. It’s an inarguable step in the correct direction, even if it’s slightly derivative of the segment as a whole.

But it was the interior that has served as the vehicle’s greatest source of strength and weakness, forcing Nissan to make some changes. Gone is the button-heavy center stack frequently surrounded by faux wood trim. Armada now utilizes a floating 12.3-inch touchscreen with psychical HVAC controls. While we’d have liked to see more buttons retained, it’s a relatively clean and contemporary look allowing Nissan to implement the kind of features today’s customers would expect. Multimedia now includes the company’s proprietary (and likely unnecessary) connected-car services, a Wi-Fi hotspot, wireless Apple CarPlay (AndroidAuto has to be plugged in), and a quartet of USB ports for front and rear passengers.

You do lose the CD player, however.

Optional upgrades include Nissan’s surround-view camera system, multiple rear-seat entertainment options, wireless phone charging, and more. Trims remain largely the same, with Platinum now offering high-quality quilted leather for a bit extra and a new S model slotting in as the base. There’s also a Midnight Edition package on the SL trim which offers a blacked-out color scheme.

Regardless of all other decisions, the Armada’s 5.6-liter V8 is obligatory. But Nissan said it’s now capable of 400 horsepower and 413 pound-feet of torque. All-wheel drive is available with but rear-drive remains standard and both configurations use the same seven-speed automatic.

As much as we hate on advanced driving aids, some have their use and the industry can’t help but pour them on. In the case of the 2021 Nissan Armada, customers can now expect to see forward-collision warnings, adaptive cruise control, blind-spot intervention, and driver-attention alerts added on as standard equipment. This is presumably in addition to the blind-spot detection, high-beam helper, automated emergency braking, and rearward automated braking that came on the previous model year.

The 2021 Nissan Armada is slated to reach dealers by late January, according to the manufacturer. Pricing and fuel economy are currently TBD and likely to be announced closer to launch.

[Images: Nissan]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 29 comments
  • Here4aSammich Here4aSammich on Dec 09, 2020

    This shold keep the rental car companies happy. The current model is all over the Emerald Aisle any time I rent. I wonder if they fixed the passenger side windshield wiper. It was so small that it didn't fully clean the windshield in front of the passenger.

  • Kokomokid Kokomokid on Dec 10, 2020

    It looks better, but will probably still be worst-in-class. They should probably just discontinue this, and the Titan.

  • 3-On-The-Tree Lou_BCone of many cars I sold when I got commissioned into the army. 1964 Dodge D100 with slant six and 3 on the tree, 1973 Plymouth Duster with slant six, 1974 dodge dart custom with a 318. 1990 Bronco 5.0 which was our snowboard rig for Wa state and Whistler/Blackcomb BC. Now :my trail rigs are a 1985 Toyota FJ60 Land cruiser and 86 Suzuki Samurai.
  • RHD They are going to crash and burn like Country Garden and Evergrande (the Chinese property behemoths) if they don't fix their problems post-haste.
  • Golden2husky The biggest hurdle for us would be the lack of a good charging network for road tripping as we are at the point in our lives that we will be traveling quite a bit. I'd rather pay more for longer range so the cheaper models would probably not make the cut. Improve the charging infrastructure and I'm certainly going to give one a try. This is more important that a lowish entry price IMHO.
  • Add Lightness I have nothing against paying more to get quality (think Toyota vs Chryco) but hate all the silly, non-mandated 'stuff' that automakers load onto cars based on what non-gearhead focus groups tell them they need to have in a car. I blame focus groups for automatic everything and double drivetrains (AWD) that really never gets used 98% of the time. The other 2% of the time, one goes looking for a place to need it to rationanalize the purchase.
  • Ger65691276 I would never buy an electric car never in my lifetime I will gas is my way of going electric is not green email
Next