QOTD: What's a General to Do?

by Steph Willems

Published: July 15th, 2020

A certain inhabitant of the Renaissance Center finds themself the odd man out. A member of the prestigious (but often tumultuous) Detroit Three club, this storied car builder now has the misfortune of having two rivals with something very similar to sell — something our protagonist, whom we’ll call The General, can’t seem to rustle up.

You all know what we’re talking about: A dedicated, right-sized, off-road SUV.

With two out of three members now fielding such a product, it is necessary for The General to join the fray and attempt to compete, or, in this time of cost constraints and uncertainty, is it better to stay put and carry on, rather than field a latecomer?

When The General returned the Blazer nameplate to the company’s product lineup, Camaro-inspired styling couldn’t smother the groans of auto journos and former owners who saw the vehicle for what it was — a car-based crossover, not the rugged, body-on-frame, rear- or four-wheel drive SUV of years past. No external spare tire with this new Blazer; just a typical crossover experience. If the Blazer didn’t strike their fancy, a fan of the company could also look at a Traverse. Or an Equinox. Or a Terrain, or an Acadia, or a Trax, or a Trailblazer, or one of two Encores. Maybe an Envision? Or how about an Enclave? If the Blazer isn’t tony enough, there’s an XT4, XT5, and XT6 to consider.

Yes, the Blazer is just a face in the crowd, as Tom Petty once said.

Matthew Guy pointed out yesterday that the base Blazer (FWD L) holds the unfortunate distinction of costing exactly — to the dollar — the same sum as a base Ford Bronco. The two vehicles couldn’t be more different. One is exactly what longtime fans of The General had hoped to see, and the other is the Blazer.

Indeed, Twitter had a field day pointing out how the Bronco and unibody Bronco Sport overlapped with the Blazer price ladder. Individuals far funnier than your author piled on, sparing no feelings.

At this point, if there’s no, say, GMC-badged Bronco/Wrangler fighter in the works already (rumors have floated for years, but never went anywhere), it seems unlikely there’ll ever be one. If you were to trade places with The General, what changes would you make to the company’s product strategy? Would you spend precious dollars hacking down a next-generation Colorado/Canyon to suit the purpose (Jimmy? Envoy?), or just let the two crosstown rivals fight it out between themselves?

Keep in mind that all current economic realities apply.

[Image: General Motors]

#QOTD #QuestionOfTheDay

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 82 comments

Conundrum on Jul 15, 2020

All I think of when someone says GM is that it is the Great American Company that couldn't organize its way out of a wet paper bag and ran with its tail between its legs from Europe. Unable to compete due to its presumably bad organization, since PSA has had no trouble making money from the remains. GM's mantra these days is yhat it will only compete in markets where it's a snap to turn a profit. Doing what Ford has boldly done with the Bronco twins and Mach E would cost actual money with no guarantee of a handsome return. The mice at the helm of GM have no taste for adventure or risk.

Like Reply
Sckid213 on Jul 15, 2020

If GM wants a vehicle to make a nostalgic-driven splash like the Bronco is, I can think of no better vehicle than the El Camino. If the model had a wide range -- affordable base model, lots of engines to choose from, all sorts of add-ons, high-po top-end models -- it could actually replace the Camaro's place in the line-up and bring similar ATPs.

Like Reply
- Vulpine on Jul 16, 2020
  
  @sckid213: They tried that with the SST... and failed miserably because they grossly over-engineered it, which drove the price up into the Corvette range after they had publicly announce it was intended for the Camaro market.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

GrumpyOldMan The "Junior" name was good enough for the German DKW in 1959-1963:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DKW_Junior
Philip I love seeing these stories regarding concepts that I have vague memories of from collector magazines, books, etc (usually by the esteemed Richard Langworth who I credit for most of my car history knowledge!!!). On a tangent here, I remember reading Lee Iacocca's autobiography in the late 1980s, and being impressed, though on a second reading, my older and self realized why Henry Ford II must have found him irritating. He took credit for and boasted about everything successful being his alone, and sidestepped anything that was unsuccessful. Although a very interesting about some of the history of the US car industry from the 1950s through the 1980s, one needs to remind oneself of the subjective recounting in this book. Iacocca mentioned Henry II's motto "Never complain; never explain" which is basically the M.O. of the Royal Family, so few heard his side of the story. I first began to question Iacocca's rationale when he calls himself "The Father of the Mustang". He even said how so many people have taken credit for the Mustang that he would hate to be seen in public with the mother. To me, much of the Mustang's success needs to be credited to the DESIGNER Joe Oros. If the car did not have that iconic appearance, it wouldn't have become an icon. Of course accounting (making it affordable), marketing (identifying and understanding the car's market) and engineering (building a car from a Falcon base to meet the cost and marketing goals) were also instrumental, as well as Iacocca's leadership....but truth be told, I don't give him much credit at all. If he did it all, it would have looked as dowdy as a 1980s K-car. He simply did not grasp car style and design like a Bill Mitchell or John Delorean at GM. Hell, in the same book he claims credit for the Brougham era four-door Thunderbird with landau bars (ugh) and putting a "Rolls-Royce grille" on the Continental Mark III. Interesting ideas, but made the cars look chintzy, old-fashioned and pretentious. Dean Martin found them cool as "Matt Helm" in the late 1960s, but he was already well into middle age by then. It's hard not to laugh at these cartoon vehicles.
Dwford The real crime is not bringing this EV to the US (along with the Jeep Avenger EV)
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Another Hyunkia'sis? 🙈
SCE to AUX "Hyundai told us that perhaps he or she is a performance enthusiast who is EV hesitant."I'm not so sure. If you're 'EV hesitant', you're not going to jump into a $66k performance car for your first EV experience, especially with its compromised range. Unless this car is purchased as a weekend toy, which perhaps Hyundai is describing.Quite the opposite, I think this car is for a 2nd-time EV buyer (like me*) who understands what they're getting into. Even the Model 3 Performance is a less overt track star.*But since I have no interest in owning a performance car, this one wouldn't be for me. A heavily-discounted standard Ioniq 5 (or 6) would be fine.Tim - When you say the car is longer and wider, is that achieved with cladding changes, or metal (like the Raptor)?