Meet the Toyota Corolla… Cross

by Steph Willems

Published: July 9th, 2020

A strange new animal has appeared overseas, bearing a name that’s very, very familiar to American drivers. Corolla Cross, by Toyota.

It’s a Corolla, only a crossover.

Let’s explore.

Revealed in Thailand Wednesday, the Corolla Cross borrows the TNGA platform found beneath the Corolla sedan and hatchback and adds a bulky new body, no doubt ensuring instant lust among vast swaths of the buying public.

Wheelbase grows a tiny amount, width increases by less than 2 inches, and overall length trails the longer Corolla sedan by just under 7 inches. Oh, and it’s taller. Overall, it slightly tops the subcompact C-HR in size. Power comes via a familiar 1.8-liter four-cylinder (140 horsepower, 129 lb-ft of torque) or a hybrid setup, with each powertrain incorporating front-wheel drive and a continuously variable automatic.

Bulging fenders aside, the Corolla Cross side-steps the wild angles and polarizing envelope of the C-HR for a more conventional appearance, with a somewhat homely front fascia aping both the full-size Sequoia and a really old Hyundai Santa Fe.

Via its Japanese webpage (helpfully translated by Google), Toyota claims the Corolla Cross combines an “appearance that makes you feel powerful” and “top-level luggage space,” adding, “we will gradually expand the number of countries in which it is introduced.”

Will America be one of those markets? Toyota has not yet confirmed it, though the automaker did trademarked the name in the U.S. back in August of 2018. It’s generally expected to appear on these shores next year.

[Images: Toyota]

#Corolla #CorollaCross #Crossovers #NewCars #Overseas #ProductPlanning #Toyota #ToyotaCorollaCross

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 51 comments

Pveezy on Jul 09, 2020

With the 2019 model the RAV4 stopped being the SUV cousin of the Corolla and became the SUV cousin of the camry.

Like Reply
Randall CArlisle on Jul 10, 2020

Didn't Toyota have this in the Matrix a few years ago? It was Corrola based and more or less a wagon, which is all that CUVs are. Call them whatever you want. But now they can be CROSSOVERS with added gray plastic and a few more bulges here and there. THE Matrix was a "hatchback", which places it in teh same calss as a Hyundai Accent, right? I liked the Matrix and lesser Pontiac version. Test drove a M Theory which was pretty cool. Glad it's back, no matter what it's called.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
Redapple2 Love the wheels
Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.