Bronco Family: Two's Not Enough?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Like its Mustang stable mate, Ford’s returning Bronco finds itself with a brood. The Bronco is now a brand, comprised of the namesake, body-on-frame off-roader and the tag-along Bronco Sport — a retro-styled model based on the unibody Ford Escape.

That’s apparently just the start of it.

Ford isn’t shy when it comes to discussing the Bronco family’s future, though it can’t say for sure who exactly will turn up at roll call.

In a media call reported by Automotive News, Ford’s U.S. marketing manager, Mark Grueber, said, “We’ll start with the three models that we have … and continue to look to where there’s customers we could satisfy with Bronco and how to continue to expand the brand in the future.”

In this exercise, the two- and four-door Broncos count as separate products.

Dave Pericak, head of Ford icons (of which Bronco, like Mustang, is a member) admitted that the automaker runs the risk of screwing everything up and watering down the heritage and majesty of the returning off-roader if it just goes hog-wild with the nameplate.

“You can make the mistake with a family of vehicles if you just start peppering that family with things that don’t live up to the core tenets with what it is you’re building,” he said. “Everything we do … it will have to live up to that same DNA and that same goal that the Bronco has, otherwise it doesn’t belong in the family. We’re not just badge-engineering. It’s not the name that makes the vehicle, it’s the vehicle that makes the name.”

Some might use this quote to criticize the upcoming Bronco Sport, which reportedly boasts standard four-wheel drive and offers a nod to its cousin via a more athletic suspension and terrain management system. Bronco Purists will surely rebel at the interloper, while the vast bulk of the buying public likely won’t care one bit. We’ve heard the same sentiment voiced by Ford in relation to the Mustang and the new Mustang Mach-E SUV.

What form could an expanded Bronco family take? Well, new SUVs seem to be off the table. Ford’s so overstocked with existing and future utility models already, it’s reportedly considering ditching the midsize Edge once the current generation reaches the end of its cycle.

There’s talk, very unconfirmed, of a Bronco pickup to compete against Jeep’s Wrangler-based Gladiator, while a compact, unibody pickup tentatively named Maverick might prove another worthy candidate. After all, it would carry the same underpinnings as the Bronco Sport (and Euro-market Ford Focus).

Join the Ford Bronco Forum here.

Join the Ford Bronco Sport Forum here.

[Image: Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 26 comments
  • Stonesguy1970 Stonesguy1970 on Jul 17, 2020

    Honestly i thin the next family member should be a full size off roader based off the f150. The expedition is more for hauling than trails. I think with would be something alone in the segment right now. if they keep the price reasonable

  • Stonesguy1970 Stonesguy1970 on Jul 17, 2020

    Honestly i thin the next family member should be a full size off roader based off the f150. The expedition is more for hauling than trails. I think with would be something alone in the segment right now. if they keep the price reasonable

  • Dr.Nick What about Infiniti? Some of those cars might be interesting, whereas not much at Nissan interest me other than the Z which is probably big bucks.
  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
Next