Dodge Tops Them All in Initial Quality: J.D. Power

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Come again? Yes, that’s the finding of J.D. Power’s latest Initial Quality Study, which examines consumer complaints over the first 90 days of vehicle ownership. As you can already see, there was plenty of disruption in the 2020 study.

Tesla, darling of both the tech and green crowds, finished dead last in the study, which ranks brands and individual models by problems experienced per 100 (PP100) vehicles. That finding comes with a caveat, however.

The electric automaker wasn’t officially ranked in the study, though that didn’t stop consumers from complaining to the tune of 250 PP100 — the worst showing of any mainstream automaker, by far. The industry average for the 2020 model year was a PP100 figure of 166.

“Unlike other manufacturers, Tesla doesn’t grant us permission to survey its owners in 15 states where it is required,” said Doug Betts, president of the automotive division at J.D. Power, in a statement. “However, we were able to collect a large enough sample of surveys from owners in the other 35 states and, from that base, we calculated Tesla’s score.”

Second-worst in the 2020 IQS was Land Rover, at 228 PP100.

Dodge’s score was 136 (up from the No. 8 sport last year), which happens to tie with a repeat chart-topper, Kia. Chevrolet and Ram shared the runner-up spot, with an average of 141 complaints apiece. For the fourth year, Genesis topped all premium brands and placed No. 3 in the overall study.

The IQS is not a barometer of long-term reliability. Indeed, a complaint can be just that — a gripe over something that you yourself might not have an issue with. In past years, complex or wonky infotainment systems have supercharged the J.D. Power complaint department, as buyers in the 55-plus age range aren’t always on the same tech page as automakers chasing the latest gee-whiz thing to add to their cabins.

A vehicle can be just fine mechanically, only to be hamstrung by its tech. At the same time, a vehicle, while not being especially great, can cop a respectable score by offering less high-tech niceties. And sometimes a model has just been on the market long enough to work out many of the bugs — a situation that could apply to Dodge, a brand whose vehicles all seem to have originated on drawing boards in the 2000s.

It seems that Ram got things right with its new full-size and heavy duty pickups. Going from 21st place to second place in the space of a year is a hell of a jump.

The other side of the coin is brands like Ford and Toyota, which both sank for 2020. The Blue Oval brand moved from fourth place in 2019 to 14th this year, placing below the industry average. Toyota sank from 10th to 16th place, tied with Honda (which placed No. 14 last year). Seven domestic brands (the aforementioned marques, plus Cadillac, Buick, GMC, and Jeep) ranked better than average this year.

Overall brand rankings are no guarantee that a specific vehicle will shine, however. On a segment-level basis, the Chevrolet Sonic and Malibu topped the IQS for small and midsize mainstream cars, while the Kia Forte took the compact class. Ford’s perennial pony car, the Mustang, earned the fewest complaints among sporty cars.

Speaking of Ford, the Ranger topped its midsize pickup rivals, while the new-for-2020 Super Duty walked away the victor in the heavy duty segment. Toyota’s ancient Tundra generated the fewest complaints among the full-size crowd.

In the SUV segments, only one American automaker — Cadillac — received top billing. The XT4 and Escalade cleaned up in the premium compact and full-size categories. Nissan’s Murano and Armada annoyed the least number of people in the midsize and large SUV fields, while Kia took top honors in the small and upper midsize SUV segments with its Soul and Sorento. The Hyundai Tucson ranked first in the compact SUV segment.

Best minivan for initial quality? The Kia Sedona, which sees a full revamp for 2021.

You’ll notice there’s no Dodges mentioned here, though that doesn’t mean the brand didn’t come close to beating challengers. The Charger was runner-up in the large car segment, while the Durango played second fiddle in the upper midsize SUV ranking.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Genesis, Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 51 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jun 25, 2020

    There is also a component of 'buyer behavior' inherent in the JD Power Initial Quality Study. (Because I am not *comparing* vehicles, just rating the one I took delivery on.) Extreme example: If you go back a decade or more, Buick used to rate very highly on this survey. At the time, Buick had relatively low conquest (high loyalty, lots of repeat buyers). [And they were actively working to reduce 'things gone wrong' on relatively 'proven' models.] If I were a lifetime Buick buyer, the Buick I bought at the time was nicer than the last one I had (and I didn't cross-shop the competition). So yes I reported very few problems at delivery. But this *doesn't* mean that a Lexus buyer sitting in the same Buick at the same point in time would have made the same observation.

  • Nrd515 Nrd515 on Jun 26, 2020

    My '18 Challenger has been, with the exception of some odd USB stick stereo glitches, flawless for the nearly two years I've had it.A couple of times a year, the stereo refuses to recognize there is a USB stick plugged in, or it can't read all of it. The stereo weirdness is resolved by just shutting the system down and turning it back on. It also has a weird thing it does when it's time to adjust for daylight savings time beginning or ending. It goes the wrong way, 2 hours, so in the Spring, instead of jumping ahead one hour, it went back 2 hours. It's kind of funny actually. No rattles, the paint is good, the seams are OK, not great, but OK, the thing runs great and the 8 speed automatic is pretty much perfection. Somehow, my car has made it through two winters in Toledo without hurting any suspension components. My older Challenger that went through 8 winters had to be fixed 7 times due to pothole damage. That's not the car's fault, it's just the awful Toledo streets, and living on one of the worst. It's finally been repaved and hopefully, a couple of years goes by before it goes to shit again. I have been in a lot of new FCA vehicles over the last 3 years and the problems have been very few and most all of the ones that weren't apparent before delivery have been confined to the digital dash, the uConnect, or stereo itself. Drivetrain issues? Well, none I can remember.

    • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Jun 26, 2020

      Some of the Hemis were supposedly munching their camshafts for a while due to bad lifters. Looks like it was a marginal design that just wasn't tolerant to lack of maintenance. Supposedly they improved the design but I maintain mine so I don't really sweat it and if it did eat it I'd just take that as a message from God that I am supposed to get a giant cam for it. I leased too though so YMMV.

  • Analoggrotto Ford wishes it could be Hyundai Kia Genesis.
  • John I used to have a 2016 Chevy Spark EV (leased, 85 miles range when new) as our family's 3rd car. Loved it. When the lease ended the only cheap EV was the bolt but I couldn't stomach the tuperware interior so I bought a used Cayman instead and have been waiting now for another a cheap EV for almost 5 years. My bigger problem would be that I dislike giving Elon Musk even more $$, but the tesla supercharger network makes long trips (within CA at least) an option.
  • SCE to AUX "...it’s unclear how Ford plans to reach profitability with cheaper vehicles, as it’s slowed investments in new factories and other related areas"Exactly. They need to show us their Gigafactories that will support the high-demand affordable EV volume.
  • 1995 SC I have a "Hooptie" EV. Affordable would be a step up.
  • Buickman if they name it "Recall" there will already be Brand Awareness!
Next