Calling Collect: Ohio Wants Its Money Back From GM

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If you weren’t aware, the sprawling General Motors assembly plant in Lordstown, Ohio is no longer cranking out Chevy Cruzes. No plant is. And there’s now a strange “Lordstown Motors” sign adorning the complex, with some sort of crazy promise about building electric pickups? Wild.

The state of Ohio certainly took notice, recalling the economic development agreement it signed with the plant’s former owner more than a decade ago. Those public perks were dependent on GM continuing operations at the plant until a point many years in the future. Fork it over, Ohio recently told GM.

Thanks to digging by ProPublica, we know that the state sent GM a letter in March demanding repayment of more than $60 million in subsidies. The agreement reached between the automaker and state contained sizable tax breaks in exchange for GM operating the Lordstown plant until at least 2027.

Amid a company-wide streamlining effort, GM sold the plant to the fledgling Lordstown Motors last year for a rock-bottom price. The automaker had ceased production of the Cruze earlier in 2019 after it was deemed unsustainable to continue operating the plant on a single shift. The car ended production last March, joining a crop of discontinued Chevrolet, Buick, and Cadillac nameplates.

Greg LeRoy, executive director of Good Jobs First, a nonprofit that seeks accountability in economic development matters, told ProPublica, “If the state were to claw back $60 million, that would be one of the biggest clawback events in U.S. history.”

He added, “This is very significant, very interesting that it would come from a Rust Belt state from a very pro-business administration.”

This is different than past public loans that, in many cases, were never paid back, with the jurisdiction forgetting that money ever changed hands.

From ProPublica:

The state Development Services Agency, which oversees economic incentive programs, notified GM in March that it would recommend that the state’s tax authority terminate the company’s tax agreements and collect a full refund. Spokesman Todd Walker said the authority would consider the matter at an upcoming meeting, though he declined to specify a date. The authority’s next session is July 27, according to its website. Provisions in GM’s tax agreements allow for state regulators to consider market conditions and whether the company continues to maintain “other operations in the state” before issuing a final determination.

Documents show GM pushed back in April, explaining that the bottom fell out of the compact car market during the time frame outlined in the agreement, and appealing for leniency during the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. This could come across as a bit rich to many, given GM’s stable financial footing. New lines of credit padded the automaker during the recent shutdown, and production is again underway at the automaker’s North American factories.

If GM does sink into the red in the second quarter of 2020, few expect it to be a long-term phenomenon. And Ohio, like most other states, could use the $60 million. Especially now.

“Cash preservation is critically important to General Motors to support a vigorous emergence from the economic and global health crisis,” Troy D. Kennedy, the company’s U.S. property tax manager, wrote in response to Ohio’s letter. “We respectfully request your assistance to help us drive towards a full recovery by choosing not to require repayment of all, or a significant portion of, the tax credits.”

In a statement sent to ProPublica, GM spokesman Dan Flores said, “We are respectfully asking the state to consider our belief that a repayment of the tax credits would be inconsistent with our significant manufacturing presence in Ohio and the Mahoning Valley.”

By that, Flores means the joint battery plant that, once operational, will fuel the automaker’s electric vehicle push. The $2.3 billion venture with LG Chem would see the creation of 1,100 jobs.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Jun 16, 2020

    The problem with govt v business is that the players in govt rotate in and out. Business can work govt till it gets what it wants...and later, govt is stuck with a deal "they " didn't make. Business can and will bankrupt out of responsibility....and government is perpetual, and cannot.

  • Cashyourcars Cashyourcars on Jun 18, 2020

    COVID-19: IS NOW A GOOD TIME TO BUY A CAR? People are defined by their reactions to certain situations. You have to ask yourself, in times of a crisis, are you the person who breaks out in the state of panic and anxiety? or are you the individual who stays strong and tries to make the best out of an otherwise horrible situation? visit our page COVID-19 has left a mark on the world. It has affected businesses, individuals, families and the lives of people all over the planet. However, managing the situation is out of your control. Instead, what you can do is manage your reaction to this distressing circumstance. For instance, if you had thought of buying a car, and recently earned cash for your cars, you can take advantage of the latest deals offered by car dealerships during COVID-19. While the situation may not be ideal, you can still drive a huge bargain and purchase the car of your dreams. Take a look at the following discounts offered by car dealerships in Australia. visit our page

  • 3-On-The-Tree Lou_BCsame here I grew up on 2-stroke dirt bikes had a 1985 Yamaha IT200 2-strokes then a 1977 Suzuki GT750 2-stroke 750 streetike fast forward to 2002 as a young flight school Lieutenant I bought a 2002 suzuki Hayabusa 1300 up in Huntsville Alabama. Still have that bike.
  • Milton Rented one for about a month. Very solid EV. Not as fun as my Polestar, but for a go to family car, solid. Practical EV ownership is only made possible with a home charger.
  • J Love mine, but the steering wheel blocks dashboard a bit, can't see turn signals nor headlights icons. They could use the upper corners of the screen for the turn signals. Mileage is much lower than shown too, disappointing
  • Aja8888 NO!
  • OrpheusSail I once did. My first four cars were American made, and through an odd set of circumstances surrounding a divorce, I wound up with a '95 Nissan Maxima which was fourteen years old and had about 150,000 miles on it.It was drove better, had an amazing engine, and was more reliable than any of my American cars. This included a new '95 GMC pickup that went through five alternators in under two years while the dealership insisted that there was no underlying electrical problem while they tried to run the clock on the warranty.That was the end of 'buy American'. I've bought from Honda and VW since, and I'll consider just about anything except American now.