Pickups: You Want 'em, You're Buying 'em, but America Now Needs to Build 'em

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
pickups you want em youre buying em but america now needs to build em

The Detroit Three has something of a problem. Sales of their cash-cow, bread-and-butter full-size pickups hardly waned during the extended pandemic lockdown, and are, as of a week ago, selling just as they had before anyone heard of the coronavirus. And yet the plants tasked with building them still aren’t online.

Automakers that just months ago were concerned with higher-than-average inventory levels now have the opposite problem.

As reported last week, Ford, General Motors, and Fiat Chrysler will commence production on a temporarily limited basis on May 18th. Getting the UAW’s approval re: worker health protocol and a green light from the state of Michigan was necessary in order to ensure parts flow (manufacturing begins May 11th) and smooth assembly sailing once vehicle production resumes.

The Detroit Three now await the starting gun and eventual ramp-up. However, customers have already returned to their truck-buying ways — not they ever entirely abandoned them. Even during the depths of the lockdown in late March and early April, sales of full-size pickups in the U.S. never flagged more than 25 percent below expectations, according to J.D. Power data. In the week ending May 3rd, that volume deficit was all but gone. Sales of the big boys wad down only 1 percent below the firm’s pre-virus forecasts.

In an investor chat last week, FCA CEO Mike Manley commented that he “can’t remember when” the automaker had such low inventory levels, CNBC reports. When production resumes, focus will be on what sells — regardless of automaker.

“I’m pretty sure you’re going to see another relatively strong month with trucks, being there are certainly configurations that we’ll be running short,” Manley said, confirming that his company’s supply of certain Rams is drying up. Ram, you’ll recall, just emerged from a boffo sales year.

Talking to analysts last week, GM’s chief financial officer, GM CFO Dhivya Suryadevara said the automaker is currently seeing low truck inventory. Pickup production will be top of mind when plants come back online, she said, adding that the company is keeping a “close eye on dealer inventory” — especially in regions that side-stepped much of the COVID carnage.

Count Dallas, Texas among those regions. That market consistently performed at or near the top of all U.S. cities in terms of sales stability over the past couple of months, never flagging by more than a modest amount. In comparison, Detroit and New York City saw their sales fall to essentially zero. Not anymore, of course.

Ford sells more full-sizers than anyone, so for its sake, hopefully the restart of its F-150 and Super Duty lines will bolster stock ahead of any shortages on the dealer side. That said, the Blue Oval plans to enter production with a limited workforce in tow. Every plant that previously operated on more than one shift will drop a shift in the near term.

[Image: General Motors]

Join the conversation
10 of 23 comments
  • Teddyc73 Teddyc73 on May 11, 2020

    Good. The purchase of just one vehicle helps so many people. We don't need to be locked in our homes, we need to be working and living and consuming and getting this country and economy back to where the President had us two months ago.

  • FreedMike FreedMike on May 12, 2020

    Well, as Bark would point out, consumers aren't the ones buying these - dealers are. And because manufacturers make more on these, it makes sense why so many are being built. But I'm willing to stand by what I predicted some time ago - I think the sedan/small car market is poised for something of a comeback, particularly if the economy doesn't recover quickly. And they won't be bought by the stereotypical "guy with a 400 FICO and no money" - they'll be bought by more fiscally cautious folks who would rather spend $30,000 on a practical purchase than $50,000 on a fashion statement, which is what trucks are for most folks. Time will tell, I suppose.

    • See 6 previous
    • Ajla Ajla on May 12, 2020

      @mcs Vans are great people movers but they aren't as good at hauling weight or dirty things and don't tow as well. My biggest personal problem with trucks is that they are all so tall. If they were available with Subaru Outback height then I'd have more interest.

  • Matzel I am hoping that Vee-Dub will improve the UX and offer additional color options for the 2024 Mk8.5 refresh for Canada. Until then, I'll be quite happy with my '21 GTI performance pack. It still puts a smile on my face going through the twisty bits.
  • Stanley Steamer There have been other concepts with BYOT, that I have always thought was a great idea. Replacing bespoke parts is expensive. If I can plug in a standard 17" monitor to serve as my instrument panel, as well as speakers, radio, generic motors, batteries, I'm for it. Cheaper repair, replacement, or upgrade costs. Heck I'd even like to put in my own comfy seats. My house didn't come with a built in LaZboy. The irony is that omitting these bespoke items at the point of sale allows me to create a more bespoke car as a whole. It's hard to imagine what an empty rolling monocoque chassis would look like capable of having powertrains and accessories easily bolted on in my garage, but something like the Bollinger suv comes to mind.
  • Iam65689044 Sometimes I'm glad the French don't sell in America. This is one of those times.
  • SCE to AUX I was going to scoff, but the idea has some merit.The hard part would be keeping the weight and cost down. Even on the EPA cycle, this thing could probably get over 210 miles with that battery.But the cost - it's too tempting to bulk up the product for profits. What might start as a $22k car quickly becomes $30k.Resource-deprived people can't buy it then, anyway, and where will Kyle get the electricity to charge it in 2029 Los Angeles?
  • SPPPP How does one under-report emissions by 115 percent? If you under-report by 100 percent, that means you said your company's products and operations cause no emissions at all, right? Were these companies claiming that their operations and products clean the air, leaving it better than when they got there?On the other hand, if someone was trying to say that the true emissions number is 115 percent higher than was reported, then the actual under-reporting value would be 53.5 percent. True emissions would be set at a nominal value of 100. The reported emissions would be 46.5. Take 115 percent of 46.5 and you get 53.5. Add 46.5 and 53.5 together and you get back to 100.A skim of the linked article indicates that the second reading is correct - meaning the EU is *actually claiming* that the worst offender (Hyundai and Kia) under-reported by 53.5 percent, and VW under-reported by 36.7 percent ((1 - (100/158))*100).I find it also funny that the EU group is basically complaining that the estimated lifetimes of Toyota vehicles are too short at 100,000km. Sure, the vehicles may be handed down from original purchasers and serve for a longer time than that. But won't that hand-me-down resale also displace an even older vehicle, which probably gets worse emissions? The concept doesn't sound that unreasonable.