Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Has Ford Humming a Sad Tune

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Did Ford rip off someone else’s playlist? The answer to this question will emerge from a courtroom, now that the owner of a vast digital music catalog has filed a lawsuit against the automaker.

The copyright infringement suit, filed late last week, accuses Ford of improperly using 54 songs in its marketing materials over the span of several years.

As reported by The Detroit News, Freeplay Music LLC stakes claim to a massive catalog of songs. The litigant in this affair, New York-based FPM, owned by theme song and jingle composer Scott Schreer, says some 74 digital Ford adverts or promotional materials sourced tunes from the catalog without paying for their use.

The lawsuit states, “This is an action for willful copyright infringement by a multibillion dollar company too cheap to secure licensing before commercially using registered works owned by another company.”

Heading the legal action are two heavy hitters. Howard Hertz (Hertz Schram PC) and Richard Busch (King & Ballow Entertainment Law) filed the lawsuit on Schreer’s behalf, with the latter of the duo known for the famous “Blurred Lines” lawsuit filed on behalf of the late Marvin Gaye’s estate.

It looks like the suits was a long time coming. Apparently, Schreer made Ford aware of its transgressions back in 2017, with his legal representatives claiming the copyright infringement continued until as late as last Thursday. The litigant seeks $150,000 for each infringement — a stiff ask that takes the wealth of the defendant into consideration.

“Finding these infringements is akin to finding a needle in a haystack. (Ford) apparently counted on the difficulty of being caught in deciding to engage in this massive willful copyright infringement,” Schreer’s lawyers wrote.

[Image: Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 9 comments
  • Dartman EBFlex will soon be able to buy his preferred brand!
  • Mebgardner I owned 4 different Z cars beginning with a 1970 model. I could already row'em before buying the first one. They were light, fast, well powered, RWD, good suspenders, and I loved working on them myself when needed. Affordable and great styling, too. On the flip side, parts were expensive and mostly only available in a dealers parts dept. I could live with those same attributes today, but those days are gone long gone. Safety Regulations and Import Regulations, while good things, will not allow for these car attributes at the price point I bought them at.I think I will go shop a GT-R.
  • Lou_BC Honda plans on investing 15 billion CAD. It appears that the Ontario government and Federal government will provide tax breaks and infrastructure upgrades to the tune of 5 billion CAD. This will cover all manufacturing including a battery plant. Honda feels they'll save 20% on production costs having it all localized and in house.As @ Analoggrotto pointed out, another brilliant TTAC press release.
  • 28-Cars-Later "Its cautious approach, which, along with Toyota’s, was criticized for being too slow, is now proving prescient"A little off topic, but where are these critics today and why aren't they being shamed? Why are their lunkheaded comments being memory holed? 'Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.' -Orwell, 1984
  • Tane94 A CVT is not the kiss of death but Nissan erred in putting CVTs in vehicles that should have had conventional automatics. Glad to see the Murano is FINALLY being redesigned. Nostalgia is great but please drop the Z car -- its ultra-low sales volume does not merit continued production. Redirect the $$$ into small and midsize CUVs/SUVs.
Next