Does Tesla Have an Obligation to Close the Fremont Plant?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
does tesla have an obligation to close the fremont plant

Tesla has earned no shortage of criticism for being the only American manufacturer yet to suspend production as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. Rather than enact a full-blown shutdown, the California-based automaker opted to reduce its active workforce to just 2,500 employees — about a quarter of its total strength.

Six counties in the San Francisco Bay Area have issued a “shelter-in-place order” aimed at curtailing the spread of the novel coronavirus. Tesla’s Fremont facility is located in Alameda County — one of the municipalities telling residents to stay in their homes and close all nonessential businesses. Noticing that the factory had failed to comply with the notice, the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office tweeted out that Tesla was “not an essential business as defined in the Alameda County Health Order.”

But we’re not even sure what the company is legally obligated to do.

The Alameda County Sheriff’s Office ended its message by saying the business can still “maintain minimum basic operations per the Alameda County Health Order.” Digging into the referenced document, we learned the following from Section 10:

For the purposes of this Order, “Minimum Basic Operations” include the following, provided that employees comply with Social Distancing Requirements as defined this Section, to the extent possible, while carrying out such operations:

i. The minimum necessary activities to maintain the value of the business’s inventory, ensure security, process payroll and employee benefits, or for related functions.

ii. The minimum necessary activities to facilitate employees of the business being able to continue to work remotely from their residences.

It sounds as though Tesla has a bit of leeway in terms of how it can run things amid the health crisis, though the order also stipulates that failures to comply with the rules are a misdemeanor and could be met with a fine, imprisonment, or both. Considering the way the Bay Area’s shelter-in-place order has been covered in the media, you’d be forgiven for any confusion.

Bloomberg recently published an opinion article suggesting there were no legal implications involved with health orders in California (before detouring rather quickly into what constitutes martial law). Meanwhile, local outlets frequently discuss the situation as if all rules are mandatory — which may be true, depending on the how local authorities handle things. But the longer Tesla resists, the more articles pop up asking what penalties the automaker will incur.

Even the history of the term “shelter in place” doesn’t offer much help. All previous instances where the phrase is used references it as a warning — not an order — and most seemed to have taken place within California over the last decade. That’s an important distinction. The term “warning” implies the expectation of compliance without ramifications, the term “order” does not.

According to the LA Times, Tesla is sticking with the narrative that there has been conflicting guidance coming from the federal government. It also seems to view itself as an essential business. “People need access to transportation and energy, and we are essential to providing it,” explained Tesla HR boss Valerie Capers Workman. The article has since been updated several times (obnoxiously, without indicating changes in new drafts) but manages to paint the clearest picture of the situation thus far.

Elon Musk’s opinion seems to be that fears of the pandemic are overblown. On March 6th, he tweeted out that “ the coronavirus panic is dumb.” This week, he told his workforce that he’d rather they stay home if they were genuinely afraid (or sick) while suggesting the virus wouldn’t surpass 0.1 percent of the population. “I will personally be at work, but that’s just me,” he said in an email to staff.

His opinion might have something to do with Tesla’s financial situation. The company’s stock has shed over half its value since February 21st. Thanks to an investment round earlier this year, the company should have a few billion in reserve to weather a temporary shutdown. Still, that likely won’t matter if the entire country stays closed for more than a couple of months. Chinese auto sales were down 80 percent in February vs the previous year. But COVID-19 also spread through the region unchecked for at least a month, suggesting the U.S. might fare better under aggressive countermeasures — though perhaps not so aggressive as China implemented (human rights and all that).

I’m not defending Tesla; I

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 28 comments
  • FreedMike FreedMike on Mar 19, 2020

    C/D is reporting Tesla is suspending production at this plant after all.

  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Mar 19, 2020

    No. It is free country.

    • See 1 previous
    • JimZ JimZ on Mar 20, 2020

      @SCE to AUX it doesn't affect him. Until it does, then he'll be begging for people to rescue him.

  • Secret Hi5 Cream of mushroom interior looks good. Impractical for families and denim jeans wearers.
  • Matt Posky Hot.
  • Lou_BC Murilee is basically correct on the trim levels. People tend to refer to Ford's full-sized cars as "Galaxie 500" or "Galaxie's" even though that's just the mid level trim. I was never a fan of the '69 snout or any of the subsequent models. The vacuum controlled headlight covers typically failed. It was a heavy clunky system also found on the Mercury's like the Cougar. The XL's and LTD's could be purchased with factory bucket seats and a center console with a large shifter, similar to the type of throttle on an airplane. The late 60's era Ford cars had coil springs in the rear which rode nice. The shape of the fender wells did not lend themselves to fitting larger tires. The frame layout carried on to become the underpinnings of the Panther platform. I noticed that this car came with disc brakes in the front. There was a time when disc's were an upgrade option from drum brakes. Ford's engines of similar displacement are often assumed as being from the same engine families. In '69 the 429 was the biggest engine which was in the same family as the 460 (385 series). It was a true big block. In 1968 and earlier, the 428, 427, 390's typically found in these cars were FE block engines. The 427 side oiler has always been the most desired option.
  • Drew8MR Minivans are expensive new if you are just buying them for utility. Used minivans are often superfund sites in back compared to the typical barely used backseats in a lot of other vehicles and you aren't going to get a deal just because everything is filthy, broken and covered in spilled food and drink.
  • Arthur Dailey This is still the only 'car' show that our entire family enjoys. This is not Willie Mays with the Mets style of decline. More like Gretzky with the Blues. It may not be their 'best' work but when it works the magic is still there.