Suppliers, Unite: BorgWarner to Buy Delphi Technologies

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
suppliers unite borgwarner to buy delphi technologies

This new era of electrification has caused many an automaker to eye a competitor’s business, and suppliers are no different. Announced Tuesday, BorgWarner has decided to buy Delphi Technologies, uniting the two businesses to better capture the growing market for hybrid and electric vehicles.

The powertrain giant pegs Delphi’s enterprise value at $3.3 billion, making this acquisition its largest to date.

Approved by the boards of both companies and expected to close in the latter half of this year, the deal aims to “strengthen BorgWarner’s power electronics products, capabilities and scale” and ensure the company’s presence in the internal combustion, hybrid, and EV market, BorgWarner said.

Delphi Technologies was cast off from Delphi Automotive, a former General Motors holding, back in 2017. Last year, BorgWarner and Delphi Technologies recorded $10.17 billion and $4.36 billion in net sales, respectively.

The acquisition works as follows: Delphi Technologies shareholders receive 0.4534 shares of BorgWarner common stock, resulting in BorgWarner owning 84 percent of the new combined entity.

“This exciting transaction represents the next step in BorgWarner’s balanced propulsion strategy, strengthening our position in electrified propulsion as well as our combustion, commercial vehicle and aftermarket businesses,” said BorgWarner CEO Frédéric Lissalde in a statement.

Synergies aren’t seen as a key driver in the deal; BorgWarner estimates it will see $125 million in cost savings by 2023. Both companies have existing cost-cutting plans in place.

Since taking the helm of the company in August 2018, Lissalde has moved quickly to position hsi business as a leader in electrified components, even signing off on a demonstration car (buggy, really) to showcase its wares.

“My goal is to accelerate the evolution of the company toward electrification and hybridization, but without forgetting that internal combustion will be around for a long time,” he told Automotive News Europe last November. “Our sector, propulsion, is offering so much opportunity for us that there’s no need to look elsewhere.”

[Image: BorgWarner]

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 7 comments
  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Jan 28, 2020

    "Synergies aren’t seen as a key driver in the deal; BorgWarner estimates it will see $125 million in cost savings by 2023. Both companies have existing cost-cutting plans in place." Corporatespeak translation: Jobs will be eliminated.

  • Roader Roader on Jan 28, 2020

    "My goal is to accelerate the evolution of the company toward electrification and hybridization, but without forgetting that internal combustion will be around for a long time." Yep. Decades. Especially considering EV sales fell last year: "Despite the debut of 45 pure electric and plug-in hybrids in the United States last year, only 325,000 plug-in passenger vehicles were sold, down 6.8% from 349,000 in 2018, according to Edmunds. That is just 2% of the 17 million vehicles of all types sold in the United States in 2019..." "The financial damage from EV overreach could be severe. Global automakers will spend $225 billion on EV development between now and 2023, according to AlixPartners. But with overall auto sales falling in China, Europe and the United States, automakers face a “profit desert” for several years — or longer, if customers don’t come around." 'Los Angeles Times' Jan. 17, 2020

  • Kwik_Shift Good thing for fossil fuels to keep the EVs going.
  • Carlson Fan Meh, never cared for this car because I was never a big fan of the Gen 1 Camaro. The Gen 1 Firebird looked better inside and out and you could get it with the 400.The Gen 2 for my eyes was peak Camaro as far as styling w/those sexy split bumpers! They should have modeled the 6th Gen after that.
  • ToolGuy From the listing: "Oil changes every April & October (full-synth), during which I also swap out A/S (not the stock summer MPS3s) and Blizzak winter tires on steelies, rotating front/back."• While ToolGuy applauds the use of full synthetic motor oil,• ToolGuy absolutely abhors the waste inherent in changing out a perfectly good motor oil every 6 months.The Mobil 1 Extended Performance High Mileage I run in our family fleet has a change interval of 20,000 miles. (Do I go 20,000 miles before changing it? No.) But this 2014 Focus has presumably had something like 16 oil changes in 36K miles, which works out to a 2,250 mile average change interval. Complete waste of time, money and perfectly good natural gas which could have gone to a higher and better use.Mobil 1 also says their oil miraculously expires at 1 year, and ToolGuy has questions. Is that one year in the bottle? One year in the vehicle? (Have I gone longer than a year in some of our vehicles? Yes, I have. Did I also add Lucas Oil 10131 Pure Synthetic Oil Stabilizer during that time, in case you are concerned about the additive package losing efficacy? Yes, I might have -- as far as you know.)TL;DR: I aim for annual oil changes and sometimes miss that 'deadline' by a few months; 12,000 miles between oil changes bothers me not at all, if you are using a quality synthetic which you should be anyway.
  • Carlson Fan Doesn't it take electricity to make hydrogen? Why not just charge a battery. Seems like that would be more efficient & clean not factoring in all the pollution it takes to manufacture today's batteries. But maybe fuel cells are just as bad, not sure about that. A hydrogen vehicle is nothing more than an electric car where hydrogen gas & a fuel cell are used in place of a battery.
  • Deanst A friend with a Model Y pays to park and then pays to charge because he can get a quick supercharge. He says other supercharger stations with free parking are not as fast.
Next