Having Pulled Off Another Win, Subaru Predicts Yet Another

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

You read on Friday how Subaru exceeded its U.S. sales goal for 2019 by 117 vehicles, pushing its American volume to the highest point in the automaker’s history — up 2.9 percent from 2018, and more than 200 percent greater than its tally just a decade prior. A hard thing to achieve in a market that cooled off in 2019.

Subaru doesn’t see last year as a high water mark, however. For 2020, the brand has even loftier expectations, but everything will have to fall into place for it to happen.

With two shadowy products on the way but not imminent, Subaru will have to rely on boosted production of existing models, two of them revamped for the 2020 model year, as well as improved quality.

Both of these elements are in the process of being fixed, says CEO Tomomi Nakamura, formerly head of Subaru’s American arm. The brand’s head honcho freed up $1 billion to improve quality control after recalls earned it a black eye. Meanwhile, the brand’s wildly low 24-day supply of new vehicles in December will improve through increased output at the automaker’s Japanese and Indiana assembly plants, Automotive News reports.

Speaking at a media event last month, Nakamura said he wants to see an average of 45 days’ worth of new vehicles in 2020, adding that some models, such as the Impreza-based Crosstrek, ended the year with a 12-day supply. The industry average is north of 60, and sometimes even 70.

“We will be revamping our inventory around that number,” he said of the 45-day figure. “We may be able to hit an overall average of 45 days’ supply in the near future.”

Unlike larger automakers, Subaru’s sparse production footprint gives it the unusual ability to quickly unload all of the vehicles it builds. With overall sales on the rise, boosting capacity is a must. Output in Indiana is expected to rise by 30,000 vehicles this year, Nakamura said.

As for product itself, the CEO feels the redesigned Legacy and its wagon sibling, the Outback, will return greater sales in 2020, helping overall volume that received a big boost from the addition of the Ascent midsizer in mid-2018. Sales of the revamped-but-still-true-to-itself Forester also rose in 2019.

So, what’s the expectation for 2020? Volume of 720,ooo to 730,000, apparently.

“There is still growth possibility in the United States,” Nakamura told reporters, adding, “We think it is still possible for us to grow in the U.S. Sunbelt. We think that’s a frontier market for us. But it’s not just the Sunbelt. There is also the Snowbelt, especially the Northeast.”

While buyers in, say, Vermont have certainly adopted Subaru as a preferred brand, consumers in the sunny South have proven a harder nut to crack. There’s great regional differences in brand loyalty in the U.S., with various elements in play — among them, socioeconomic factors, consumer ethnicity, brand image, and weather. Standard full-time all-wheel drive is obviously a bigger draw in areas where there’s good reason to lose traction.

As for those two upcoming models, one is an electric crossover co-developed with Toyota. The other, billed as a global SUV, remains hazy, destined for a segment the automaker hasn’t yet revealed. Whatever the form these vehicles take, they won’t be on sale in 2020.

[Images: Subaru]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 27 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Jan 06, 2020

    Subaru is best known for super-symmetric AWD.

  • Tankinbeans Tankinbeans on Jan 06, 2020

    I'm confused. Why is having a 24 day supply necessarily a bad thing? Wouldn't this indicate that they've forecasted the demand appropriately, and isn't this how they manage to sell their wares without resorting to incentive spending? Wasn't it just the other day there was the story of incentive spending and Subaru was at the bottom of the back with something like $1,500 per car? Couldn't more manufacturers learn from Subaru, the relative quality or lack thereof being an entirely separate issue? I'm genuinely curious.

    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jan 07, 2020

      60 days' supply has been the long-term target/rule of thumb for the U.S. market (and more recently probably more like 70). Going significantly over this number (usually because of poor sales) is a very bad thing - it ties up capital, and nothing good happens to vehicles that sit for too long (ex. flat spots on the tires, 12V battery deterioration). Lower days' supply sounds like a good thing. But when you are down to 12 days of Crosstrek inventory, you are losing sales. Remember that the days' supply figure is an average - the inventory is at >600 U.S. Subaru dealers. So if I want a Crosstrek and you don't have one, or if I really want a Limited and all you have are Base CVT models, or if I'm shopping for a Premium Manual, you see the issue. Not to mention options - and body color, which is huge for some buyers. If I order exactly the Crosstrek I want, it has to be shipped from Gunma. Shoving me into a model that I don't want, or persuading me to get a color or a trim that doesn't fit my long-term needs, results in an immediate sale for the dealer, but doesn't do Subaru and me any favors in the long term. (All of this might make you wonder if there would be better [and less expensive] models for vehicle ordering and distribution in the U.S. market. Other places use different methods.)

  • Corey Lewis Facing rearwards and typing while in motion. I'll be sick in 4 minutes or less.
  • Ajla It's a tricky situation. If public charging is ubiquitous and reliable then range doesn't matter nearly as much. However they likely don't need to be as numerous as fuel pumps because of the home/work charging ability. But then there still might need to be "surge supply" of public chargers for things like holidays. Then there's the idea of chargers with towing accessibility. A lack of visible charging infrastructure might slow the adoption of EVs as well. Having an EV with a 600+ mile range would fix a lot of the above but that option doesn't seem to be economically feasible.
  • 28-Cars-Later I'm getting a Knight Rider vibe... or is it more Knightboat?
  • 28-Cars-Later "the person would likely be involved in taking the Corvette to the next level with full electrification."Chevrolet sold 37,224 C8s in 2023 starting at $65,895 in North America (no word on other regions) while Porsche sold 40,629 Taycans worldwide starting at $99,400. I imagine per unit Porsche/VAG profit at $100K+ but was far as R&D payback and other sunk costs I cannot say. I remember reading the new C8 platform was designed for hybrids (or something to that effect) so I expect Chevrolet to experiment with different model types but I don't expect Corvette to become the Taycan. If that is the expectation, I think it will ride off into the sunset because GM is that incompetent/impotent. Additional: In ten years outside of wrecks I expect a majority of C8s to still be running and economically roadworthy, I do not expect that of Taycans.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Not all martyrs see divinity, but at least you tried.
Next