Uber Founder Kalanick Vacates Company's Board

by Matt Posky

December 26th, 2019 12:47 PM

uber founder kalanick vacates companys board

Uber Technologies co-founder Travis Kalanick is leaving the company’s board to focus on his new business endeavors in other industries. The company made an announcement on Tuesday, with Kalanick expressing a need to move on.

“Uber has been a part of my life for the past 10 years. At the close of the decade, and with the company now public, it seems like the right moment for me to focus on my current business and philanthropic pursuits. I’m proud of all that Uber has achieved, and I will continue to cheer for its future from the sidelines. I want to thank the board, Dara [Khosrowshahi] and the entire Uber team for everything they have done to further the Uber mission,” Kalanick said in a statement.

Stepping down as CEO in 2017 after a series of wholly unnecessary scandals ( sometimes with Travis at the center), Kalanick stopped managing the company’s daily business. Uber then embarked on an effort to improve its corporate governance, with its better-known founder (apologies to Garrett Camp) being pushed into the shadows. Pressure from investors became overwhelming after he was caught on video arguing with a driver over the company’s pay structure in a period where Uber’s corporate culture was already broadly presumed to be toxic. He was replaced with Khosrowshahi about a month later.

“I love Uber more than anything in the world and at this difficult moment in my personal life I have accepted the investors request to step aside so that Uber can go back to building rather than be distracted with another fight,” Kalanick said in a statement from 2017.

According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, Kalanick has been aggressively offloading shares in the company since November. As of December 16th, his remaining stake represented roughly one-fifth of his $3 billion fortune. Subsequent business plans likely involve giving more attention to a startup that provides short-notice kitchen space to restaurants interested in expanding their food-delivery services — possibly via Uber Eats. His last official day as a board member will be December 31st.

“Very few entrepreneurs have built something as profound as Travis Kalanick did with Uber. I’m enormously grateful for Travis’ vision and tenacity while building Uber, and for his expertise as a board member. Everyone at Uber wishes him all the best,” said Khosrowshahi.

[Image: JStone/Shutterstock]

#AutomotiveIndustry #IndustryNew #Ride-share #StaffingChanges #Travis2.0 #TravisKalanick #Uber #UberTechnologies

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 7 comments

Art Vandelay on Dec 27, 2019

don't let the door hit you on the @$$ on the way out buddy.

Like Reply
Michael S6 on Dec 28, 2019

Pickup trucks and large SUV's should have the same fuel economy requirements as cars as often times the are used as family cars. Getting 17 miles a gallon is very wasteful unless you are using the truck for work purpose. There is no question that pick up trucks are very versatile but if we all drove vehicles averaging 17 miles per gallon, then we will be back to 1970 where the USA was at mercy of OPEC. Also the the elephant (pickup) in the room is the issue of global warming.

Like Reply
- Brn on Dec 29, 2019
  
  You appear to be a victim of the new layout. I doubt this was the intended comment for this article.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Brett Woods My 4-Runner had a manual with the 4-cylinder. It was acceptable but not really fun. I have thought before that auto with a six cylinder would have been smoother, more comfortable, and need less maintenance. Ditto my 4 banger manual Japanese pick-up. Nowhere near as nice as a GM with auto and six cylinders that I tried a bit later. Drove with a U.S. buddy who got one of the first C8s. He said he didn't even consider a manual. There was an article about how fewer than ten percent of buyers optioned a manual in the U.S. when they were available. Visited my English cousin who lived in a hilly suburb and she had a manual Range Rover and said she never even considered an automatic. That's culture for you.  Miata, Boxster, Mustang, Corvette and Camaro; I only want manual but I can see both sides of the argument for a Mustang, Camaro or Challenger. Once you get past a certain size and weight, cruising with automatic is a better dynamic. A dual clutch automatic is smoother, faster, probably more reliable, and still allows you to select and hold a gear. When you get these vehicles with a high performance envelope, dual-clutch automatic is what brings home the numbers. 
ToolGuy 2019 had better comments than 2023 😉
Inside Looking Out In June 1973, Leonid Brezhnev arrived in Washington for his second summit meeting with President Richard Nixon. Knowing of the Soviet leader’s fondness for luxury automobiles, Nixon gave him a shiny Lincoln Continental. Brezhnev was delighted with the present and insisted on taking a spin around Camp David, speeding through turns while the president nervously asked him to slow down. https://academic.oup.com/dh/article-abstract/42/4/548/5063004
Bobby D'Oppo Great sound and smooth power delivery in a heavier RWD or AWD vehicle is a nice blend, but current V8 pickup trucks deliver an unsophisticated driving experience. I think a modern full-size pickup could be very well suited to a manual transmission.In reality, old school, revvy atmo engines pair best with manual transmissions because it's so rewarding to keep them in the power band on a winding road. Modern turbo engines have flattened the torque curve and often make changing gears feel more like a chore.
Chuck Norton For those worried about a complex power train-What vehicle doesn't have one? I drive a twin turbo F-150 (3.5) Talk about complexity.. It seems reliability based on the number of F-150s sold is a non-issue. As with many other makes/models. I mean how many operations are handle by micro processors...in today's vehicles?