Phantom Braking Leads to Mazda 3 Recall


A system designed to detect obstacles on the road ahead and automatically apply the brakes is acting up in current-generation Mazda 3 vehicles. Seems it’s seeing things that aren’t there.
On Friday, Mazda announced a recall of 35,390 Mazda 3 sedans and hatchbacks in the U.S., spanning the 2019 and 2020 model years.
The company claims the defect contained within its Smart Braking System (SBS), known more generally as automatic emergency braking, can cause vehicles to come to a sudden stop. This obviously poses a risk to occupants, as the driver of a following vehicle might be caught off-guard (though perhaps not, if they’re driving a similarly equipped Mazda).
From Mazda:
Incorrect programming of the SBS control software may cause the vehicle to falsely detect an obstacle in front of the vehicle while driving. In certain cases, the SBS control software may automatically apply the vehicle brakes to prevent or reduce damage from a collision, even though no collision is imminent. If the SBS automatic emergency braking system unexpectedly activates while driving, the risk of a rear-end crash from a following vehicle may increase. There is a warning alarm sound and warning message displayed in the multi-information and active driving displays when this defect occurs.
The automaker claims it doesn’t know of any injuries or accidents stemming from the phantom brake applications.
With its new-for-2019 Mazda 3, Mazda sought to take the compact sedan and hatch upmarket, part of the brand’s premium-minded makeover. Part of that effort included greater standard content, as well as the option of all-wheel drive. Sadly for Mazda, instant sales success did not follow.
The model performed badly in 2019, leading the company to offer even greater levels of content for 2020 — including automatic emergency braking, which became standard kit on all trims.
[Image: Mazda]

More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- George Hughes What ever happened to the American can-do attitude. I know what, it was coopted by the fossil fuel industry in their effort to protect their racket.
- 28-Cars-Later "But Assemblyman Phil Ting, the San Franciscan Democrat who wrote the electric school bus legislation, says this is all about the health and wellbeing of Golden State residents. In addition to the normal air pollution stemming from exhaust gasses, he believes children are being exposed to additional carcinogens by just being on a diesel bus."Phil is into real estate, he doesn't know jack sh!t about science or medicine and if media were real it would politely remind him his opinions are not qualified... if it were real. Another question if media were real is why is a very experienced real estate advisor and former tax assessor writing legislation on school busses? If you read the rest of his bio after 2014, his expertise seems to be applied but he gets into more and more things he's not qualified to speak to or legislate on - this isn't to say he isn't capable of doing more but just two years ago Communism™ kept reminding me Dr. Fauxi knew more about medicine than I did and I should die or something. So Uncle Phil just gets a pass with his unqualified opinions?Ting began his career as a real estate financial adviser at Arthur Andersen and CBRE. He also previously served as the executive director of the Asian Law Caucus, as the president of the Bay Area Assessors Association, and on the board of Equality California. [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Ting#cite_note-auto-1][1][/url][h3][/h3]In 2005, Ting was appointed San Francisco Assessor-Recorder in 2005 by Mayor Gavin Newsom, becoming San Francisco’s highest-ranking Chinese-American official at the time. He was then elected to the post in November 2005, garnering 58 percent of the vote.Ting was re-elected Assessor-Recorder in 2006 and 2010During his first term in the Assembly, Ting authored a law that helped set into motion the transformation of Piers 30-32 into what would become Chase Center the home of the Golden State Warriorshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Ting
- RHD This looks like a lead balloon. You could buy a fantastic classic car for a hundred grand, or a Mercedes depreciationmobile. There isn't much reason to consider this over many other excellent vehicles that cost less. It's probably fast, but nothing else about it is in the least bit outstanding, except for the balance owed on the financing.
- Jeff A bread van worthy of praise by Tassos.
- Jeff The car itself is in really good shape and it is worth the money. It has lots of life left in it and can easily go over 200k.
Comments
Join the conversation
I had this happen to me once in a 2016 Hyundai Genesis on a very narrow, winding 2 lane road, with cars parked on both sides. This road was winding enough that, since I used it daily, I turned off the LKAS because it constantly alarmed. I now have a 2019 Mercedes GLC and no problems with Autobrake, or BSM. This model lacks the LKAS so who know how well that might work, or not.
I'm sorry to hear that others have experienced what I did when I owned my '19 Mazda 3. As pointed out by the owner of a newer CX-5, it may be due to the camera angle being too wide. Whatever the reason, I stand by my opinion that such systems should be under control of the driver. I realize that user-defeatable safety systems will lead to lawsuits. Unfortunately, there's no safety system out there that is idiot-proof. On a related note, how long have there been airbags and we're still dealing with shrapnel/etc from Takata? I don't like the idea of being sacrificed on the altar of perceived safety improvements...