A Little Trouble in Big China? Tesla Prices Model 3 for Upmarket Tastes

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Eager to minimize import costs, Tesla has made impressive progress laying down roots in China. The company secured a long-term lease on a 210-acre site near Shanghai in October of 2018. Ground was broken at the start of January, with the $5 billion facility estimated to begin producing cars as early as this November. While all of this effort was aimed at expanding the brand in Asia while minimizing costs, it’s not translating into a cheaper Model 3 for the Asian market.

Tesla, being Tesla, has decided to launch the Model 3 with a starting MSRP of $50,000. According to Bloomberg, that’s only 3 percent less expensive than the versions it had to ship across the ocean. Rather than attempting to build more budget-conscious variants, the automaker decided to offer all vehicles sold in China with Autopilot and additional standard content.

From Bloomberg:

The first Tesla vehicles to be produced outside the U.S. are part of Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk’s efforts to expand in Asia and take on local electric-vehicle upstarts. The pricing suggests Musk is trying to maintain Tesla’s premium image in the world’s largest auto market, leaving local competitors to compete for buyers of cheaper EVs.

“It might affect the choices of some potential customers, but not much,” said Yale Zhang, the founder and CEO of [the Shanghai based] consultancy AutoForesight. “The product’s target group is not that price-sensitive compared with those choosing much cheaper ones.”

While the Model 3 can be sourced in America below $40k, those exported to China typically cost $51,500. There’s no way there aren’t a few thousand Chinese shoppers that will be disappointed to learn their home-grown variants will be priced roughly the same — even if they come with a bit more content. But this is Tesla, a company that likes to lead with its more-extravagant products. Asia probably should have seen this coming.

Will the strategy play for the first foreign-controlled automotive assembly plant in China? Maybe. Leaning upon pricier models seems to have worked for Tesla in the past, but the company faces a lot more electrified competition in the PRC. Government influence has created countless EV brands in China and encouraged established carmakers to embrace electrification more than they have in the West.

Bloomberg noted that local rivals will be able to undercut Tesla’s pricing by significant margins, with even the higher-end firms remaining competitive. For example, NIO sells the all-electric ES6 crossover for around $47,800 in China. It’s quite a big bigger than the Model 3 while offering similar range and its own unique traits ( like a cute digital assistant). That could force Tesla to go all in on its premium image, hoping that China responds favorably.

Tesla claims Chinese-made variants of the Model 3 will go on sale in the first quarter of 2020 — all of them with Autopilot.

[Image: B.Zhou/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • MBella MBella on Oct 27, 2019

    Don't make at premium cars cost 3 times as much over there compared to the US? Wouldn't that make the Tesla a bargain?

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Oct 27, 2019

    The picture: It looks like they found the paint defect(s). [I see two fingers pointed.]

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next