See No Evil: Backup Camera Concerns Lead Nissan to Recall… Almost Everything
Nissan is recalling over 1.2 million late-model vehicles out of fear that drivers will shift into reverse and see nothing on their infotainment screens. The recall affects 2018 and 2019 models of almost the entire Nissan and Infiniti stable.
Because the backup camera on the affected vehicles can be adjusted to the point that no view of the area behind the vehicle remains, Nissan finds itself in violation of federal safety rules. The problem is not that the image can be adjusted, but that the obscured view will remain after the driver restarts the vehicle and shifts into reverse.
The list of models is a long one.
Citing the ability of the backup camera to remain stuck in the pre-selected setting even after the car is shut off, the automaker stated in documents filed to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that the issue “could lead to an increased risk of an accident in the event the
driver does not re-adjust the display before reversing.”
“As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 111, ‘Rear Visibility,'” Nissan wrote.
The FMVSS rule requires “the rear visibility system of vehicles manufactured on or after May 1, 2018 to return to a default image at the beginning of each backing event regardless of any modifications the driver previously selected.”
Every new or recent Nissan model equipped with a backup camera contains the fault, meaning a widespread voluntary recall will soon commence. The vehicles affected reads like a full inventory of the company’s model line.
Dating from either the 2018 or 2019 model year (often both), the models include the Nissan Altima, Frontier, Kicks, Leaf, Maxima, GT-R, Murano, NV, NV200, Pathfinder, Rogue, Rogue Sport, Sentra, Titan, Versa Note, and Versa Sedan. Additionally, Nissan is recalling Infiniti Q50, Q60, QX30, QX50, QX60, Q70, Q70L, and QX80 models.
You’re safe, 370Z and Armada drivers.
A full list of VINs will roll out to dealers between October 7th and 11th, with owners notified of the recall between October 21st and November 11th. In total, the recall impacts 1,228,830 vehicles, some 126,195 of which reside in Canada. A number of units also found their way to South Korea and Israel.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Fahrvergnugen NA Miata goes topless as long as roads are dry and heater is running, windscreen in place.
- Fred Private equity is only concerned with making money. Not in content. The only way to deal with it, is to choose your sites wisely. Even that doesn't work out. Just look at AM/FM radio for a failing business model that is dominated by a few large corporations.
- 3SpeedAutomatic Lots of dynamics here:[list][*]people are creatures of habit, they will stick with one or two web sites, one or two magazines, etc; and will only look at something different if recommended by others[/*][*]Generation Y & Z is not "car crazy" like Baby Boomers. We saw a car as freedom and still do. Today, most youth text or face call, and are focused on their cell phone. Some don't even leave the house with virtual learning[/*][*]New car/truck introductions are passé; COVID knocked a hole in car shows; spectacular vehicle introductions are history.[/*][*]I was in the market for a replacement vehicle, but got scared off by the current used and new prices. I'll wait another 12 to 18 months. By that time, the car I was interested in will be obsolete or no longer available. Therefore, no reason to research till the market calms down. [/*][*]the number of auto related web sites has ballooned in the last 10 to 15 years. However, there are a diminishing number of taps on their servers as the Baby Boomers and Gen X fall off the radar scope. [/*][/list]Based on the above, the whole auto publishing industry (magazine, web sites, catalogs, brochures, etc) is taking a hit. The loss of editors and writers is apparent in all of publishing. This is structural, no way around it.
- Dukeisduke I still think the name Bzzzzzzzzzzt! would have been better.
- Dukeisduke I subscribed to both Road & Track and Car and Driver for over 25 years, but it's been close to 20 years since I dropped both. I tried their digital versions with their reader software (can't remember the name now), but it wasn't the same. I let it lapse after a year.From what I've seen of R&T's print version, it's turned into more of a lifestyle thing like The Robb Report. I haven't seen an issue of C/D in a while.I enjoyed both magazines a lot when I was subscribing. R&T for the road tests (especially the April Fools road tests), used car reviews, historical articles, and columns like Peter Egan's Side Glances and Dennis Simanitis's Technical Correspondence. And C/D for the road tests and pithy commentary, and columns like Gordon Baxter's, and Jean Shepherd's (that goes way back to the early '70s).