Car Talk: GM's Barra to Sit Down With Trump Thursday

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

General Motors CEO will meet with U.S. President Donald Trump and White House officials on Thursday to discuss the state of the automotive industry, trade issues, and the fuel economy rollback. We imagine it’ll go much differently than their first meeting in Washington.

Perpetually concerned with economic threats arising from China, Trump has come down hard on automakers in the past. These days, his favorite punching bag happens to be GM. The automaker’s strong presence in China has forced it to make commitments there. On this side of the Pacific, the automaker has shuttered production facilities in Michigan, Ohio, and Maryland while continuing to manufacture vehicles in Mexico — something the UAW has been exceptionally critical of going into contract negotiations.

GM was chosen as the initial target in the latest round of UAW-Detroit Three bargaining. While the automaker’s industrial footprint in the U.S. is much larger than in Mexico or China, boasting more factories and a bigger workforce, it’s been an ongoing issue. The UAW has been particularly critical of the Chevrolet Blazer, arguing the crossover should could have been produced in America at a time when GM was deciding to close Lordstown Assembly in Ohio.

That’s left the union with a strange ally in the president. His problems with General Motors (and other automakers) seem to echo UAW’s concerns perfectly. However, one wonders how productive his talk with Barra can actually be after seeing some of his comments going into it.

“General Motors, which was once the Giant of Detroit, is now one of the smallest auto manufacturers there. They moved major plants to China, BEFORE I CAME INTO OFFICE,” Trump tweeted last week. “This was done despite the saving help given them by the USA. Now they should start moving back to America again?”

Soon, every media outlet on the planet caught the gaffe and published information we already know — GM is actually one of the biggest automakers on the planet. However, after spending over an hour wondering what made him think otherwise, we think we may have an answer. Based on the tweet’s timing, it seems likely that Trump was referencing a Bloomberg study that showed GM now employs fewer union-represented American workers than either of its domestic rivals.

Previously the country’s largest employer, General Motors’ domestic endeavors shrunk as the company become more of a global entity. It was also bloated going into the 2008 financial crisis. Before filing for bankruptcy in 2009, GM was furiously spinning off parts of the business in a bid to save itself. Once the time came to bite the financial bullet, it cut thousands of workers and closed numerous plants. While not facing the same economic hardships in 2019, GM is presently in the midst of a widespread restructuring effort — this time with the aim of future-proofing itself.

According to Reuters, the White House says the meeting with Barra will take place Thursday afternoon in the Oval Office, but neither General Motors nor Washington seems willing to hint at the topics to be covered. Negotiations with the UAW will, undoubtedly, be brought up. Existing contracts expire on September 14th and GM will likely face the brunt of the union’s wrath. Trump will almost certainly ask Barra why GM can’t keep more of its business inside the U.S., as it’s something he’s harped on continuously since taking office. He’s also previously asked GM not to join Ford and a handful of other automakers in backing deal with California for stricter fuel economy standards against the backdrop of his administration’s rollback attempt.

[Image: General Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 36 comments
  • Robbie Robbie on Sep 06, 2019

    I hope Trump leaves GM alone. If they want to make cars in China, then let them. We live in an interconnected world now.

    • See 2 previous
    • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Sep 07, 2019

      @Robbie We also don't live in a crony state so leaving them alone means not granting them special exemptions from tariffs levied on countries in which they build vehicles or source parts to build vehicles. She'll have her say in 2 years on this policy with every other voter. I am unsympathetic however. GM reaped the profits of building and sourcing in these low cost countries so now that's it's gone a little sour they can be left alone to deal with it.

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Sep 08, 2019

    This would've been an interesting meeting to watch. GM has a ~1980's business model. Trump has a ~1950's understanding of globalization. They would need multiple translators and would still talk past each other.

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next