Less-than-wicked Lexus GS 300 Heads Behind the Barn

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The Lexus GS, a midsize, rear-drive sports sedan that first rode into the North American market in 1993, is today a slow-selling model in danger of discontinuation.

For 2020, one member of the GS lineup will indeed bite the dust.

According to CarsDirect, dealer order guides for the upcoming model year show no sign of the entry-level GS 300, the most affordable — and slowest — of the GS line. A Lexus spokesperson confirmed the model’s discontinuation for 2020.

According to Alissa Moceri, “the GS 300 represented a small percentage of GS sales in 2018.”

Certainly, spotting a new GS of any type is a difficult task. The model’s U.S. sales totalled 305 units in July, with June seeing just 214 GS models leave dealer lots. Last year’s GS sales amounted to just over a quarter of 2015’s volume, which was a post-recession high water mark for the sedan.

As Toyota mulls dropping bodystyles and models, the GS is seen as a prime candidate for the chopping block. Sedan sales of all types are on the decline, and Lexus is already well stocked with traditional four-doors. Currently, no rumors or official word exists of a pending redesign for the GS, a model that has soldiered on in its current guise since 2011.

The GS 300 utilized a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder, good for 241 horsepower and 258 lb-ft. While this rare sight won’t live to see another model year, the GS 350 and its F Sport variant, in both RWD and AWD guise, will soldier on, offering buyers more power in the form of a 3.5-liter V6. The larger of the two mills generates 311 hp and 280 lb-ft. Also returning is the hot GS F and its 467 hp, 389 lb-ft 5.0-liter V8.

With the GS 300 gone, GS’s pricing floor climbs a few steps. For 2020, the model line starts at $52,420 after destination for a GS 350 RWD.

[Image: Lexus]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 42 comments
  • Turbo_awd Turbo_awd on Aug 26, 2019

    Maybe they should have kept the original GS430 competitive, rather than letting it wither and then try to save it with a really-late 5.0 installation? When your top model has an anemic 3.5 V6 (similar to the standard Ford V6 in the Taurus, etc), there's very little "Sport" left of your "Gran Sport" moniker..

  • Featherston Featherston on Aug 28, 2019

    Good to know 311 HP is "anemic."

    • MorrisGray MorrisGray on Oct 01, 2019

      It is ironic that nowadays people think they need so much horsepower to be satisfied. I owned a 1970 Dodge Charger 383 magnum engine (4sp) and a 1976 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 455 (4sp) and both these cars were considered true muscle cars back then. They were very exciting to drive and seemed pretty powerful. I don't think either one of them had 300hp factory stock. My wife's 2012 Genesis sedan was rated 333hp and has more than enough power in my opinion. So many people seemed concerned with 0-60mph ratings but that is so irrelevant for daily use of a car. I do enjoy a quick accelerating car but not for 0-60mph use. I don't street race anymore and certainly don't want any tickets. Times have changed and all I want is a dependable fun car to drive and it would be nice to still be able to order a car with only the options you want, like it used to be 40+/- years ago.

  • Funky D The problem is not exclusively the cost of the vehicle. The problem is that there are too few use cases for BEVs that couldn't be done by a plug-in hybrid, with the latter having the ability to do long-range trips without requiring lengthy recharging and being better able to function in really cold climates.In our particular case, a plug-in hybrid would run in all electric mode for the vast majority of the miles we would drive on a regular basis. It would also charge faster and the battery replacement should be less expensive than its BEV counterpart.So the answer for me is a polite, but firm NO.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 2012 Ford Escape V6 FWD at 147k miles:Just went thru a heavy maintenance cycle: full brake job with rotors and drums, replace top & bottom radiator hoses, radiator flush, transmission flush, replace valve cover gaskets (still leaks oil, but not as bad as before), & fan belt. Also, #4 fuel injector locked up. About $4.5k spread over 19 months. Sole means of transportation, so don't mind spending the money for reliability. Was going to replace prior to the above maintenance cycle, but COVID screwed up the market ( $4k markup over sticker including $400 for nitrogen in the tires), so bit the bullet. Now serious about replacing, but waiting for used and/or new car prices to fall a bit more. Have my eye on a particular SUV. Last I checked, had a $2.5k discount with great interest rate (better than my CU) for financing. Will keep on driving Escape as long as A/C works. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Rna65689660 For such a flat surface, why not get smoke tint, Rtint or Rvynil. Starts at $8. I used to use a company called Lamin-x, but I think they are gone. Has held up great.
  • Cprescott A cheaper golf cart will not make me more inclined to screw up my life. I can go 500 plus miles on a tank of gas with my 2016 ICE car that is paid off. I get two weeks out of a tank that takes from start to finish less than 10 minutes to refill. At no point with golf cart technology as we know it can they match what my ICE vehicle can do. Hell no. Absolutely never.
  • Cprescott People do silly things to their cars.
Next