BMW is Going to Nickel-and-dime You to Death, Others Likely to Follow

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
bmw is going to nickel and dime you to death others likely to follow

As automakers connect more vehicles to the internet and install app-based shops into the dashboard, we’ve become increasingly worried with in-car marketing annoyances and the prospect of companies hiding content behind paywalls. Our concerns turned out to be valid.

BMW has decided that it will charge customers an annual subscription fee if they want to utilize CarPlay in its latest models. Odd, considering most other automakers have been trying to get the platform inside their cars as standard equipment. However we’re betting that changes unless BMW gets a healthy dose of criticism.

Subscription models have, unfortunately, become growingly popular among businesses. Research conducted by management consulting firm McKinsey & Company estimated that subscription e-commerce retailers went from $57 million in sales in 2011 to $2.6 billion in 2016. But monthly delivery services are only the tip of the iceberg. Practically every industry is getting on the trend, whether it makes sense or not, making the official tally impossible to estimate. Some tech and media subscription services rake in billions all by their lonesome every year.

It’s easy to see why companies are trying to incorporate subscriptions. They’re an effective way of distancing value from a service. A couple bucks a month doesn’t sound like much but, as you add things up over a period of years, it becomes meaningful. Inputting your credit card and making things a click a way only makes things easier for the business. In fact, it’s often more work to cancel a subscription than start one and odds are good that you’ll forget it exists after a few months ⁠— allowing companies to continue charging you without your realizing it. A Waterstone Management Group survey from 2018 found that 84 of Americans vastly underestimate their monthly tech spending due to the phenomenon.

While BMW currently offers CarPlay for a one-time fee of $300, the new arrangement converts this to a 12-month plan of $80. The company does have a 240-month plan for $300, but it’s unlikely this will be promoted at dealerships. Either way, it doesn’t cost the automaker anything to add this content on the coming vehicles (all of which will be connected to the internet). It’s simply being tucked behind a paywall that’s being converted to a subscription model. Meanwhile, its rivals are (mostly) offering CarPlay as standard equipment.

Perhaps equally telling is BMW’s recent announcement that it is establishing a new partnership with U.S. Bank to provide an “enhanced digital experience and greater value for customers.” The automaker already said it was toying with the idea of a points-based reward system ⁠— potentially gamifying in-car shopping ⁠— while it develops a robust automotive marketplace. Now it’s issuing credit cards where customers can earn and redeem points toward BMW products and services. Round and round we go. Except we know where this stops; right back at the BMW store.

None of this would be so unsavory if it didn’t involve withholding content and stacking subscription fees. Sadly, we estimate that other premium manufacturers will attempt something similar (and soon). Mercedes-Benz has hinted at placing automotive options behind MBUX purchases as well. And don’t think this will be limited to high-end nameplates with customers more willing to spend money. As infotainment systems continue to evolve, this may become par for the course.

[Image: BMW]

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 123 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Jul 25, 2019

    Guys calm down, that is how it works in Europe - you have to pay for these kind of perks. We are lucky that search engine was invented in USA and not in Europe. If it was invented in Europe it would be ad free, no privacy intrusion,, no data mining but you had to pay subscription fee or even better - pay higher taxes since technology would be invented by Allmighty Government. Minitel anyone? Internet was invented not by Al Gore but by François Mitterrand.

  • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Jul 27, 2019

    I mean, it was standard in my Fiesta but whatever.

  • MrIcky Unimogs
  • Parkave231 On the one hand, I always thought that TriPower was a horrible name for the L3B engine (and LSY, although I don't recall seeing that name applied in practice), especially since one of the three technologies reduces said power (AFM). Of all the historic GM names to bring back...On the other hand, TurboMAX is a horrible replacement name. Turbo-Quad4? (Yes, I know it's not.) FleetFour? (Seemingly target market?) FourReal?
  • SCE to AUX The diesel isn't that compelling compared to the 2.7T, when you consider the 50% fuel cost premium and the need for DEF.But regularly towing 9500 lbs with a 4-cylinder (even a low-stress one like this) seems to be overdoing it. I'd get the 4 for lighter duty, the diesel for medium duty, and one of the 8s for heavy duty.
  • Analoggrotto Over the years GM has shown a keen interest in focusing their attention and development money on large, expensive or specialized vehicles and little to no progress in developing something excellent to complete with such class leaders as : Camry, Telluride, Civic, CR-V, Highlander, Accord, or even ho hum Corolla. And this is the way class division works in the heartland/rustbelt: pretend to care for the common man but cater the public resources to additional security and comfort for the upper echelons of society. GM is Elitist American Communism.
  • Art Vandelay Current Fiesta ST
Next