NHTSA Estimates Minor Improvement in Roadway Fatalities for 2018

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has released its preliminary report on how many people died on U.S. roadways in 2018, indicating that overall traffic deaths had likely fallen by 1 percent. While the information doesn’t exactly justify a party, it’s good news after the last few years attempted to provide new footage for the Red Asphalt series.

As the first major spike in traffic deaths since the “Swinging Sixties,” 2015 freaked everyone out a bit. Save for a few annual hiccups, American traffic deaths (contrasted with its population) had been on the decline for decades. However, by the end of 2016, things looked certain — it was becoming less safe to drive in the United States.

Of course, that’s all relative to how safe we were before. In truth, those driving in 2016 were statistically less likely to die than than anybody traveling prior to 2009. But many worried that the sudden influx of traffic fatalities were part of a new trend, spurred largely by distracted driving, that would send us hurtling back toward the pre-seatbelt era in terms of crash survivability.

While 2017 gave us a minor reprieve from the previous year’s body count, declining by 2 percent, the risks endured on the road improved by an almost negligible margin. It was better, but only just. The NHTSA claimed that 2018 should offer more of the same.

“A statistical projection of traffic fatalities for 2018 shows that an estimated 36,750 people died in motor vehicle traffic crashes,” the agency said. “This represents a slight decrease of about 1.0 percent as compared to the 37,133 fatalities that were reported to have occurred in 2017.”

Despite the total number of deaths appearing to have stabilized, the NHTSA expressed concerns for pedestrian and cyclist safety. The agency is projecting a 4-percent rise in pedestrian fatalities and a 10-percent increase bicycle-related deaths for 2018.

That’s likely the result of more people having moved into urban areas. According to Automotive News, pedestrian deaths accounted for 16 percent of all U.S traffic deaths in 2017, up from 12 percent in 2009. Following the broader trend of urbanization shows that this was similarly true for motor-vehicle crashes, which have proliferated inside of cities while gradually declining in more rural parts of the country. Deaths of people inside vehicles, which reached an all-time high of 80 percent of all traffic deaths in 1996, fell to 67 percent in 2017. However it should be noted that the 33-percent remainder includes pedestrians, bicyclists and motorcyclists.

Check out the NHTSA’s preliminary study for yourself here.

[Image: Photo Spirit/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Indi500fan Indi500fan on Jun 18, 2019

    I feel incredibly safe driving today. Of course I grew up in the 50s when motoring was actually somewhat dangerous. 80 mph highway speeds on bias ply tires, drum brakes, and no seat belts.

  • Slavuta Slavuta on Jun 18, 2019

    So, now that they see, all these idiotic nannies don't do anything, they can start removing them

  • George Some Folks should remember the newest version of this car as the Chevy Aveo was a Free car given away by the White House when Obama was in office and made it happen for folks who had a big old truck that ate gas.so this was meant to help you get to and from work and save at the pump. But one guy was upset that he was receiving a car which he didn’t want but a truck of his choice He Should Understand This:Obama was trying to get you to point A to Point B He wasn’t trying to help you socially by telling your friends that Hey! I Got a New Truck Just Like You Do So Don’t Write Me Off just because you got a new truck and I Don’t.
  • Frank I worked for a very large dealer group back in 2014 and this sat in the crown jewel spot at our GM store showroom. It sat, and sat...and sat. Thing was a boat anchor. I remember the price being insane for a re-skinned Chevy Volt that was also a boat anchor
  • George When I Seen This So Called Nova(Really A Corolla Sold Elsewhere) I could tell this Car And The Corolla that you could buy here or rent at a car rental place Is very Different The interior Floor In This Nova is very high like in a rear wheel drive car where the regular Corolla the entire interior floor is several inches lower that your head doesn’t touch the ceiling and feels very roomy like in a chevette with no tightness and the Corolla gives you a option,Split folding seat backs so you can haul long items and more cargo space using your back seat area. Which you don’t get with that Nova I Wonder Why GM/ Toyota didn’t Offer things like this for this car? It would make this Nova A hit like the Corolla was. And if you bought a Metro OR Suzuki Swift You’ll Get All Of These Features Standard and ONLY Pay For A Few options Floor mats Wheels Covers Air Conditioning and Automatic transmission and that’s it I guess some buyers were buying this car as a second car just to get around by.
  • Lou_BC I can't see how eliminating 2 different engine tunes is a cost saving measure. It's just programming.
  • Inside Looking Out Because they have money.
Next