Florida Governor Signs Bill Allowing AVs Without Human Safety Drivers

by Matt Posky

Published: June 13th, 2019

florida governor signs bill allowing avs without human safety drivers

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed CS/HB 311: Autonomous Vehicles into law on Thursday, claiming the state has effectively removed “unnecessary obstacles that hinder the development of autonomous vehicle technology,” including human safety operators.

Provided that a vehicle meets all insurance requirements, Florida will no longer require AVs to operate with a flesh-and-blood person behind the wheel. However, those that do remain in the driver’s seat, will also be exempt from the state’s distracted driving laws.

“Signing this legislation paves the way for Florida to continue as a national leader in transportation innovation and technological advancement,” said Governor DeSantis in a statement. “I would like to thank the bill sponsors, Senator Jeff Brandes and Representative Jason Fischer, for their work in making Florida the most autonomous vehicle-friendly state in the country.”

The bill signing took place at the new SunTrax facility in Polk County, Florida, a site devoted to the research and development of the latest transportation technologies. DeSantis and company claimed that the bill, along with SunTrax’s research, would help ensure the state can lead the charge in terms of autonomous research for the foreseeable future.

“I applaud the Governor for his continued commitment to invest in emerging transportation technologies,” said Florida Department of Transportation Secretary Kevin Thibault. “Autonomous vehicles are the way of the future and Florida is leading the charge through the research, testing and development of autonomous vehicles. And now with this bill signed into law by Governor DeSantis, Florida is ready to lead the nation with this innovative transportation advancement.”

Florida’s role as a no-fault insurance state could help make the process of insuring AVs a little easier, but the rules and liability issues surrounding self-driving cars are still pretty foggy. Insurers don’t have a concrete plan in place for autonomous vehicles; they’re examining the issue while federal and state governments do the same. However, with the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety anticipating 3.5 million self-driving vehicles on U.S. roads by 2025, time is of the essence.

[Image: Florida Governor’s Press Office]

#AutonomousTesting #AutonomousVehicles #AVs #CS/HB311 #Florida #Government #Laws #RonDeSantis #Self-drivingCars #SunTrax

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 20 comments

Akear on Jun 14, 2019

All this really does not matter in the long run since autonomous vehicles will never see the light of day as a main stream technology. Let those who are jumping on the autonomous band wagon get the hype out of their system. I just hope not too many die in pursuit of this dead-end technology. I don't mind automation taking over when a driver falls asleep or is facing a medical crisis. This technology could be useful in those rare emergencies. However, a fully autonomous car just is not in the cards. If you went into a showroom and saw a vehicle without a steering wheel wouldn’t that make you just a bit nervous.

Like Reply
- Chocolatedeath on Jun 14, 2019
  
  The problem with what you're saying about going to the showroom is the fact that if I am going to a showroom and all they have are vehicles with no steering wheels then really I'm not driving so therefore I don't actually need a choice. at this point to me is like picking out very expensive socks, they serve a purpose for aesthetics but you don't really get any pleasure out of them.
  
  Like
Mike Beranek on Jun 14, 2019

Thank God I live in the north and won't have to worry about these things for a very long time. A reason to love snow?

Like Reply
- Tele Vision on Jun 16, 2019
  
  Agreed from an Albertan. These articles about autonomous vehicles crack me up. I've had to punch through 18" snow drifts on my way to work; dodge deer and elk and even a moose; and climb back up onto the road after some idiot, who was too scared to move over, ran me off into the ditch at 40 MPH. Let's see a Google blobcar do any of that.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.