BMW M2 Competition to Replace M240iR Customer Racecar

Anthony Magagnoli
by Anthony Magagnoli
bmw m2 competition to replace m240ir customer racecar

BMW has announced a successor to the popular M235i and M240i Racing models in the form of the M2 Competition. While the first cars are slated for delivery in the second quarter of 2020, they will see their first public race test during round 5 of the VLN Endurance Championship at the Nürburgring on August 3rd, 2019.

The “M235i Racing” customer racing model proved to be highly successful in Europe and the U.S. Introduced to the U.S. in 2016, Toby Grahovec drove his Classic BMW M235iR to the Pirelli World Challenge TC class championship that year. Customer orders were fulfilled in the second half of 2016 and I personally raced one in 2017 for Rooster Hall Racing, securing Rookie of the Year honors that season. Now in their 4th year in the U.S., the SRO TC America class is dominated by the M235iR and M240iR models. In the opening round, 14 of the 17 entrants were in the BMWs.

The M235iR has also been popular in BMW CCA Club Racing, as well as several endurance racing series. It is common to find them in organizations such as American Endurance Racing, World Racing League, and Lucky Dog Racing League. Even ChampCar (formerly ChumpCar) has seen M235iR entries. With endurance-spec brakes, a transmission that can’t be “money shifted”, and relatively benign handling, it’s an ideal car for endurance use when dealing with varying drivers.

To follow up on the popularity of the M235iR, BMW will be introducing the M2 Competition as an entry-level customer racing car, based on the M2 Competition road car. BMW’s Customer Racing services will be expanded in the U.S. by building and developing competence centers here. Capable partners will be commissioned to support teams at a local level who have extensive motorsport expertise. I can attest to the importance and value of having reliable factory-backed support for a factory-built race car.

While the M240iR was introduced in 2018 as an evolution of the M235iR, it was little more than some cosmetic upgrades to align with the production road cars. Both cars race alongside each other in TC America.

The M2 Competition road car has a 405hp S55 engine from the M3/M4, 7-speed Dual Clutch Transmission, and Active M differential. The M240i – and its associated Racing version – have the 335hp N55 engine, 8-speed ZF automatic transmission, and standard clutch-type M Performance limited slip differential. The relevant suspension and brake differences between the street cars are changed out for racing, so they are not so important. But clearly, there would be a performance differential between the M2 and M240i if the powertrain and drivetrain are to be carried over.

Being that the M2 Competition racecar is aligned as an entry-level car for professional racing, as well as suitable for club racers, the performance would be expected to align with the current M240iR. The TC America class’ balance of performance is now essentially built around the BMW. It is the baseline that other manufacturer’s cars are adjusted to match. After all, it makes sense to tweak a couple cars here and there as opposed to the vast majority of the field.

The question is, what will happen to all the M235iR and M240iR cars that are currently racing? There does not exist a current classing structure here between the current M240iR and the M4 GT4 for a higher-performance M2 version to fit into.

I see two potential solutions for the U.S. One is that the M2 Competition is a largely-cosmetic “evo” package, like the M240iR update was. This would allow the existing cars to continue competing, even if an update becomes mandatory for the professional SRO TC America series.

The other possibility is that the new M2 racecar is classed into TC America but undergoes a “detuning” process to balance the performance with the M240iR. BMW Group Motorsport Director Jens Marquardt said, “With the new entry-level model — the successor to the BMW M240i Racing — we are… offering our grass-roots customers continuity.”

Continuity would indicate an evolution rather than an outright replacement. I expect that we’ll find out by August 3rd. I’ll be paying attention to this particular VLN race to find out more.

[Images: BMW Group; Halston Pitman]

Comments
Join the conversation
 4 comments
  • SPPPP SPPPP on Jun 25, 2019

    Or just keep all the cars in the same class and let the cheapskates lose until they pony up the cash for the new model?

    • Anthony Magagnoli Anthony Magagnoli on Jun 26, 2019

      Balance of Performance (BoP) will seek to equalize the cars. There are rules on how old a platform can be, but with the 2-series still being on sale, the M235iR won't be phased out any time soon.

  • Theflyersfan Theflyersfan on Jun 26, 2019

    Just an "I'm curious" question - I thought it was very interesting and basically radical for BMW to put the water injection cooling in the M4 GTS to help get all of that extra power out of the engine. I believe BMW was the first in years, if not decades, to put that into a street legal production car. Given you're racing BMWs, and putting those engines through hell, do they provide the water injection in those engines as well, or was that just a one-time only thing with those competition M4 GTS models? Given the new 3-series is on the streets now, and the M3 and M4 should be out in 2020 and 2021 respectively, I wonder if they are going to produce that model again.

    • Anthony Magagnoli Anthony Magagnoli on Jun 26, 2019

      Water Injection is not included in the M4 GT4 for a couple reasons. One is that the tank is heavy and weight is the enemy. The other is that its a BoP class and power is regulated, anyway. There's no need for it. That's a good question. The M4 GTS and M3/M4 CS models were not exactly big sellers. If they bring the models back, I think they'll revise the formula a bit and possibly cut down the price premium some. I think that's what hurt them. Here's a piece I did on the M3 CS for another outlet: https://jalopnik.com/when-lightweighting-goes-too-far-1834280856

  • MaintenanceCosts We hear endlessly from the usual suspects about the scenarios where EVs don't work as well as gas cars. We never hear the opposite side of the coin. From an EV owner (since 2019) who has a second EV reserved, here are a few points the "I road trip 1000 miles every day" crowd won't tell you about:[list][*]When you have a convenient charging situation, EV fueling is more convenient than a gas car. There is no stopping at gas stations and you start every day with a full tank.[/*][*]Where there are no-idling rules (school pickup/dropoff, lines for ferries or services, city loading, whatever else) you can keep warm or cool to your heart's content in your EV.[/*][*]In the cold, EVs will give you heat from the second you turn them on.[/*][*]EVs don't care one bit if you use them for tons of very short trips. Their mechanicals don't need to boil off condensation. (Just tonight, I used my EV to drive six blocks, because it was 31 degrees and raining, and walking would have been unpleasant.)[/*][*]EVs don't stink and don't make you breathe carcinogens on cold start.[/*][*]EV maintenance is much less frequent and much cheaper, eliminating almost all items having to do with engine, transmission, or brakes in a gas car. In most EVs the maintenance schedule consists of battery coolant changes and tire maintenance.[/*][*]You can accelerate fast in EVs without noisily attracting the attention of the cops and every passerby on the street.[/*][/list]
  • MaintenanceCosts Still can't get a RAV4 Prime for love or money. Availability of normal hybrid RAV4s and Highlanders is only slightly better. At least around here I think Toyota could sell twice the number of vehicles that they are actually bringing in at the moment.
  • Tree Trunk Been in the market for a new Highlander Hybrid, it is sold out with order time of 6 months plus. Probably would have bit the bullet if it was not for the dealers the refuse to take an order but instead want to sell from allotment whether it fits or not and at thousands over MRSP.
  • AKHusky The expense argument is nonsense. My mach e was $42k after tax credit. Basically the same as similarly equipped edge. And it completely ignores that the best selling vehicles are Rams, F150s, and Silverados, all more expensive that a bolt, MAch e or ID4. As an owner, I'd say they are still in second car territory for most places in the country.
  • Johnster I live in a red state and I see quite a few EVs being purchased by conservative, upper-class Republicans (many of them Trump-supporters). I suspect that it is a way for them to flaunt their wealth and that, over time, the preference for EVs will trickle down to less well-off Republicans.
Next