Uber Lowballs IPO, Eager to Avoid Lyft's Fate

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Ride-hailing company Uber approached its Thursday initial public offering with an abundance of caution, setting a lower-than-expected share price in a bid to avoid rival Lyft’s stock plunge.

When markets open Friday, Uber’s stock will be priced at $45, near the bottom of a previously stated range that topped out at $50. That puts Uber’s initial valuation at just over $82 billion. Amid controversy surrounding its business practices and growing uncertainty about the viability of huge ride-hailing firms, Uber hopes to raise $8.1 billion from its IPO.

As stated by Barron’s, Uber’s initial valuation is well below the $100 billion it hinted to investors a while back. The urge to go high may have been strong, but a quick look at Lyft’s stock would give anyone in the same business second thoughts.

Lyft entered the stock market in March, its shares priced at $72. The following two months has seen the company’s share price nosedive, and Tuesday’s first-quarter earnings report, which showed a $1.1 billion loss, didn’t help. Lyft’s share price hit a new low the following day, bottoming out at $52.91.

“We continue to view Lyft’s stock performance and lack of disclosures going forward (bookings, take rates) as the 1-2 punch, which, coupled with a choppy tech tape, caused Uber to look at a more conservative price range based on its demand for its IPO, a prudent strategy in our opinion coming out of the box,” said Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives in a Wednesday note.

Uber lost more than $3 billion last year. Under CEO Dara Khosrowshahi, the company aims to pivot from a ride-hailing company to a more diverse entity offering tech and a range of transportation solutions. The company earned widespread criticism and put its self-driving test program on hold following its involvement the world’s first autonomous car pedestrian fatality. That incident took place in Tempe, Arizona, in March 2018.

“Uber is basically Lyft 2.0. Good model, growing sales. But, yet again, here comes California math once more. It is still losing a ton of money,” said Brian Hamilton, founder of data firm Sageworks. “If you buy, you are buying a bull market, not a company.”

[Source: Reuters] [Image: Uber]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
 3 comments
  • Alfisti Alfisti on May 10, 2019

    How on EARTH do these companies lose money??? It's just an app! I know developers are expensive but ... it's just an APP! Absolutely baffles me.

    • See 1 previous
    • Cashmoney Cashmoney on May 10, 2019

      @SPPPP Google Hubert Horan’s articles about Uber’s finances and accounting. Enjoy the subsidized rides but under no circumstances should anyone invest. There’s no credible plan for becoming profitable.

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next