Nearly Dead in the U.S., Fiat Turns to Brazil for Rekindled Love

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles is going all-in in Brazil, where the struggling Fiat brand was once the country’s top choice for new vehicles. The automaker has announced a $4 billion plan to boost market share in the only non-U.S. region that made the company any money last quarter.

Leading the way are two new Fiat SUVs, joined by a host of Jeep and Ram offerings.

FCA CEO Mike Manley didn’t have much to say about those future models during a Brazil plant tour Wednesday, though he did talk up the size of the product surge, Bloomberg reports.

By the time the cash dump dries up in 2024, Brazilian buyers can expect 15 new, refreshed, or “special series” models, while the new Ram and Jeep offerings will number 10.

“We want to make sure the Fiat brand remains very strong in Brazil’s marketplace,” Manley said. “The Fiat brand is a vital part of our business.”

Last quarter, FCA’s Latin America region turned in $117 million before interest and taxes, with a profit margin of 5.4 percent. Manley hopes to take that figure into the double-digits by 2022. Fiat came to Brazil in 1976 and remained a top seller until 2015, after which Volkswagen and General Motors took the lead. Jeep volume has grown rapidly, hitting 4.8 percent of the country’s market share last year, and Manley wants to see that continue.

Part of the $4 billion will go towards boosting production at the company’s Pernambuco plant, which opened in 2015, from 250,000 vehicles per year to 350,00. That plant builds the Jeep Renegade and Compass.

A new plant will also begin construction to supply the market with small, turbocharged engines, Manley added. For 2019, the company introduced a new 1.3-liter turbo four to serve as the top powerplant in the global Renegade line. It makes 177 horsepower and 200 lb-ft of torque. There’s also a 1.0-liter three-cylinder that makes 120 hp and 140 lb-ft.

There’s no word on whether the two new Fiat SUVs bound for Brazil have any chance of appearing on American shores. The company barely mentioned the brand’s U.S. presence during last year’s five-year plan unveiling, and sales of the Renegade-derived 500X crossover have not met anyone’s expectations. Last year, Fiat’s market share in the U.S. fell to 0.09 percent, with sales over the first four months of 2019 falling 42 percent.

[Image: Murilee Martin/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • EGSE EGSE on May 25, 2019

    Drilled down to page 11 of the annual report: LATAM Net Revenue FY2018 = €8.2B. I interpreted the $117 million incorrectly. Ready....fire....aim. Maybe the numbers work out. Never mind.....

  • Namesakeone Namesakeone on May 25, 2019

    I take it that the pictured row in the lead photo was some BHPH used car lot that was bought out?

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next