Union Says Fiat Chrysler Ready to Pony Up for a New Product at Windsor Assembly

by Steph Willems

Published: April 19th, 2019

union says fiat chrysler ready to pony up for a new product at windsor assembly

Hot on the heels of Fiat Chrysler’s announcement of a shift cut at its Windsor, Ontario minivan plant, officials from Canadian autoworkers’ union Unifor say the automaker has $355 million ready to invest in the facility.

Last month, FCA told Unifor it would cut the plant’s third shift by the end of September, the result of falling minivan sales on both sides of the border. Windsor Assembly employs 6,100 workers, some 1,500 of which stand to lose their jobs. Unifor President Jerry Dias claims the investment will see a new product built in Windsor.

News of the $355 million investment, said to roll out within the next 12 months, came from a sit-down between FCA brass and Unifor officials on Wednesday, the Windsor Star reports.

“There’s no question Fiat Chrysler is committed to Windsor,” Dias said following a talk with Fiat Chrysler COO Mark Stewart. “The bottom line is they’re investing for future product. It doesn’t mean it’ll save the third shift, but that’s what we’ll work on now.”

What form will that product take? A flurry of reports earlier this year claim an all-wheel drive Chrysler Pacifica is in the works, with plant preparation alleged to take place over the summer. Slotting an AWD Pacifica into the automaker’s lineup could potentially prop up the minivan’s sagging sales by drawing in customers who might otherwise have bought a crossover or SUV. Toyota recently added an AWD version of its Prius in a bid to lure buyers in wintry climes.

There’s also the issue of the Chrysler Portal, a minivan-type vehicle, perhaps electric, that’s rumored to ride atop the Pacifica platform. However, that vehicle remains hazy, despite reports claiming FCA has approved its production for the 2021 model year.

“They know what they want to do, but they’re finalizing a few things,” Dias told the Star. “They want to maximize their investment in Windsor. The Pacifica platform gives them all kinds of options.”

He added, “I’m feeling a lot more comfortable (about the plant).”

FCA Canada, when contacted, would not discuss future product or the promised investment.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

#ChryslerPacifica #Fca #FiatChryslerAutomobiles #FutureVehicles #ProductPlanning #Production #Unifor #WindsorAssembly

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 13 comments

Lorenzo on Apr 20, 2019

Well, if everything at Windsor is based on an AWD Pacifica platform,, FCA can do what they've done with Jeep: put out multiple variations. Imagine a Pacifica-based AWD Charger and Challenger, maybe even a Chrysler limo. What will they do with Brampton Assembly? make Euro-spec Alfas for export to Europe, bypassing the unpleasant EU-US trade foofaraw, while getting better build quality for US-spec Alfas imported under USMCA.

Like Reply
DougD on Apr 22, 2019

Not sure how much further Pacifica based product will take them, since in 2019 the Grand Caravan is still outselling the Pacifica almost two to one. If they're doing some new product, how about a more durable transmission and enjoyable shift programming for the existing Gen5 Grand Caravan? That's 10 years of Caravans requiring some new product, next time the tranny goes in my 2015 it'll be out of warranty and since I'll be paying the bill myself I'd pay more for something that lasts more than 100,000 km =:(

Like Reply
- Steve203 on Apr 22, 2019
  
  My suspicion is Pacifica sales are running tens of thousands per year below prediction, so they keep the Caravan to keep the plant busy and cover the plant overhead. Now that the Pacifica is a few years old, (and, like the Dart, suffers some of the worst TV ads ever) sales are falling faster than the Caravan's, down 29%ytd, vs down 18% for the Caravan. Adding an AWD option to the Pacifica would add only a tiny number of additional sales. FCA looked at an AWD option when the Pacifica came out and judged the few marginal sales gained not worth the bother. The money allocated by FCA to Windsor, a paltry $355M, isn't enough to tool for a new model, but it sounds about right to move the Journey from Toluca to Windsor, to fill the production slots left empty by falling Caravan, and faster falling Pacifica, sales. If I was advising FCA, I would give serious consideration to dropping both minivans, dropping the idea of making an assembly plant out of Mack Engine, and make Windsor Grand Cherokee plant #2, but Mike Manley seems to have lost my phone number.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.