Tesla Raises Prices, Eliminates Maintenance Plans, Claims EVs Are Too Reliable

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Over the weekend, Tesla CEO Elon Musk asked the world to “please note” that prices on all Tesla inventory would rise by about 3 percent on April 1st. While it sounds like the setup to a particularly bland April Fool’s prank, Musk followed up by saying, “To be clear, this doesn’t affect Tesla website order prices. Existing inventory prices are currently slightly lower than on website. This will bring them in line,” which is only slightly funny.

The automaker is also scrapping its extended service plans, intended to provide annual maintenance on its vehicles. Considering how often Tesla adjusts pricing, this is the bigger story. But let’s give the money matters a little attention before making our deep dive into the company’s bold reliability claims (which is Tesla’s stated reason for the yearly maintenance program’s kiboshing).

The pricing increase officially begins at midnight on April 2nd, meaning individuals willing to settle on a pre-fab Tesla can save themselves 3 percent if they act quickly. However, those waiting to customize their vehicles online already found themselves subject to a (variable) 3-percent MSRP hike earlier this month. Basically, this brings Tesla’s unsold inventory up to par with new-model pricing in the coming quarter.

Moving on to the maintenance program, Tesla doesn’t think it needs to bother. It says electric vehicles don’t require annual maintenance and regular fluid changes, so customers can fall back on as-needed servicing without fear. Previously, the company recommended servicing the Model S and X once per year, or every 12,500 miles. Meanwhile, the Model 3 was said to be good for a checkup every two years or 25,000 miles. That’s changed.

While it may be true that an EVs wellbeing does not hinge on spark plugs or oil and transmission fluid exchange, Tesla did acknowledge that its customers will still need to stay on top of servicing duties related to brake pads, brake fluid, calipers, filters, and air conditioning — even though those items were previously included as part of its extended service plan.

That sounds fine, but Tesla’s reliability has been called into question by both annoyed customers and independent studies. Fortunately for Tesla and its fan base, very few of these issues have anything to do with the powertrain (which has been the case with EVs in general). Most of the guff Tesla garnered from Consumer Reports of late revolves around manufacturing defects resulting in lackluster fit and finish. While those complaints have been enough for the outlet to redact its earlier recommendation on the Model S and 3, both vehicles still rank highly among electric cars and hybrids.

We also know that a glut of minor problems have helped overwhelm the company’s service centers. Wait times are frequently longer than they need to be, with tons of anecdotal evidence of cars coming back in no better shape than when they left the owner’s garage. With Tesla planning to eliminate storefronts and minimize the need for parts distribution centers, it makes sense that it would want to suspend its vehicles’ premium maintenance schedule. But what about all the people who already bought in?

Tesla says customers who purchased extended 3- and 4-year service plans can request a refund of the remaining length of the plan. However, it still recommends they come in for tire rotation and balancing every 12,000 miles, regular winter maintenance (every 12,500 miles in cold climates), and a fluid/filter checkup every 2 years.

We’re curious to see how this plays with the public. On one hand, Tesla can humblebrag that its powertrains are more reliable than internal-combustion engines and require a less rigorous maintenance schedule. Fewer people bringing their cars in should also help make repairs and servicing run a little smoother. Musk said that improving service in North America was among the company’s biggest concerns earlier this year. However, this could seriously backfire if Tesla turns out not to be 100-percent accurate in its reliability claims.

[Images: Tesla]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 26 comments
  • 0Gravity 0Gravity on Mar 26, 2019

    Inflation is roughly 2% per year in the US so a 3% increase is barely a price rise in real dollars

  • Sirwired Sirwired on Mar 26, 2019

    "We're just making too much darn money off this product! We should stop selling it!" - No CFO Ever Seriously, an ICE hardly requires piles of TLC for quite a long time. An oil change twice a year (if that), a new engine air filter every couple years, and transmission fluid every 3-5 years is not exactly a major investment in money or time. Even at dealer rates, it's not terribly much. (And as a DIY, it's a rounding error.) With modern spark plugs, that's generally the first time anything resembling actual work is usually required, and that's not until 100-something k these days. (And that's only a bit deal on a transverse V6; it's a 10-minute job on an I4.)

    • Jatz Jatz on Mar 26, 2019

      This. We buy new ICE cars for the blissful ignorance they permit.

  • 28-Cars-Later One of the biggest reasons not to purchase an EV that I hear is...that they just all around suck for almost every use case imaginable.
  • Theflyersfan A cheaper EV is likely to have a smaller battery (think Mazda MX-30 and Mitsubishi iMEV), so that makes it less useful for some buyers. Personally, my charging can only take place at work or at a four-charger station at the end of my street in a public lot, so that's a crapshoot. If a cheaper EV was able to capture what it seems like a lot of buyers want - sub-40K, 300+ mile range, up to 80% charging in 20-30 minutes (tops) - then they can possibly be added to some lists. But then the issues of depreciation and resale value come into play if someone wants to keep the car for a while. But since this question is asking person by person, if I had room for a second car to be garaged (off of the street), I would consider an EV for a second car and keep my current one as a weekend toy. But I can't do a 50K+ EV as a primary car with my uncertain charging infrastructure by me, road trips, and as a second car, the higher insurance rates and county taxes. Not yet at least. A plug in hybrid however is perfect.
  • 28-Cars-Later Neither, but Honda lost the plot a while back in my view so Rav it would be.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Nope. Still not interested.
  • 28-Cars-Later I know someone who would snap this up for the right money, but Ontario and likely the ask would prohibit it.
Next