Subaru Prepares For Largest Recall Yet

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
subaru prepares for largest recall yet

Expanding by leaps and bounds in the new millennium, Subaru effectively quadrupled its share of the U.S. market in the process. However, most of its production growth occurred in the last decade — leading to quality control problems unbefitting for a company that prides itself in sharing the same love as its customers.

Recalls are to be expected. No automaker can escape faulty components forever. But the frequency and scope of Subaru’s recalls (and scandals) over the past few years are especially bothersome, as they hint at an inability to catch mistakes, or perhaps a willingness to cut corners, as the company’s production volume targets the stratosphere. A new recall looming on the horizon will probably be the company’s largest to date.

According to Reuters, Subaru plans to recall roughly 2.3 million vehicles globally over a defective brake light switch — an issue that could potentially confuse the ignition, making it impossible to start the car. However, that’s a secondary issue of the potential confusion it could create for motorists travelling behind the vehicle.

Affected vehicles include Impreza and Forester models manufactured between 2008 and 2017, according to the automaker. The outlet reported Subaru as saying nearly 2 million of the cars hail from North America, with another 300,000 located in Japan. That’s a lot of fixing to add to the company’s already long list of recalls.

From Reuters:

Since late 2017, Subaru has been reeling from a host of problems ranging from faulty components to inspection re-dos which, coupled with weakening sales in the United States, has forced the automaker to slash its full-year profit outlook to its weakest in six years.

Quality-related issues have cast a pall on the automaker which enjoyed years of rapid growth in the United States, where it won over affluent and liberal-minded consumers with advertisements featuring slogans championing love and inclusion.

Such branding boosted the image of the tiny automaker, prompting it to ramp up production in the United States, which accounts for around 60 percent of its global sales volume.

Unfortunately, the automaker’s feel-good image is being tarnished as Subaru evolves into a larger company. Last year, Subaru admitted to falsifying fuel economy data after being faulted for decades of improper final inspection procedures in 2017.

Meanwhile, recalls have gotten out of hand. Over the last 12 months, the manufacturer halted production to address a defective power-steering unit, recalled 320,000 cars with weak valve springs, 229,000 vehicles with faulty software, and a couple hundred crossovers that made it out of the factory only partially welded.

As Subaru is growing at an incredible pace, introducing new models in the process, the company has a pretty good excuse for losing its previously admirable reputation for dependability. However, that doesn’t bode well for future growth — especially once the general public stops seeing it as the ultra-reliable brand it used to be. Subaru is losing what makes it special, and those endearing ad campaigns can’t do all of the heavy lifting. Brand loyalists will eventually smarten up and start cross shopping if the company doesn’t turn this around.

[Image: Subaru]

Join the conversation
8 of 71 comments
  • Ryan Ryan on Mar 01, 2019

    Hi Liam, I read your post and wanted to share my full disclosure experience(s). Toyota is my favorite automobile manufacturer, I owned 4 of their automobiles - new. Subaru is a close second for me. I've owned 3, new Subaru's. I have also owned 4 Honda's, of which I easily had the most issues with. Combined, I put roughly 100,000 miles on the 4 'Yota's (one was involved in an accident that was deemed a total loss after four months of ownership), 115,000 miles on the 3 Subies, and 90,000 ,miles on the 5 Honda's. Of the four Toyota's the biggest repair I had was a malfunctioning cruise control stock. This issue was fixed under warranty and I was provided with a free loaner during the process. My Subaru's gave me not one issue between the 3 of them. I did put new tires on one of the them but I chalked that up to aggressive driving and mileage wear and tear. My Honda's were my problem children. My Civic burned at lest a complete quart of oil in-between oil changes. No leaks in my garage, the engine had to have been burning it off. My second Civic had a moon roof with a mind of its own and Leaked a plenty. Of the 3 new Fit's I owned one of them had the A/C compressor die on me. I was covered but with less than 15,000 on the odd, I was skeptical. Two recalls on one of my other Fit's as well as he dreaded air bad recall on my last Fit. I currently own my first Mazda, No ploblems as of yet but Ive only put 35,000 miles on it in the last two years.

    • See 3 previous
    • Ryan Ryan on Mar 04, 2019

      @Liam Gray I absolutely agree Liam. Most automobiles with a 3rd petal bring a smile to my face.

  • Hriehl1 Hriehl1 on Mar 04, 2019

    2010 Forester; did timing belt last summer at 115K with no head gasket symptoms. Now at 124K we need new head gaskets. Given Subaru's poor history with head gaskets, it'll be hard to justify returning to Subaru for our next new car. Given how trouble free our 2012 Mazda5 (with a stick!) has been at 105K and counting, perhaps their Forester-class CUV is worth a look.

    • See 1 previous
    • Gtem Gtem on Mar 04, 2019

      Hard to believe they went south so suddenly. No signs of minor oil weepage/dampness at the gaskets prior to this? Did you check yourself?

  • 28-Cars-Later Another: How does Stellantis plan to leverage the EV experience of PSA and Opel (?) against the former FCA operation?
  • Ltcmgm78 We bought a 2017 Volt when it came off lease. What a great car! Cost us $18,000 to buy. We put gas in it a couple of times a year. GM blew it with this car as they have done with others. No buyer education. This should have been the bridge car between pure ICE vehicles and pure battery vehicles. No range anxiety at all. And ours still gets 44 mpg running the gas "generator" to power the electric motor. We love it and wish a new model would return to market.
  • Tassos "Fools Cells" are 20 years into the future.THe problem is, the clowns who cheerlead for them have been saying this for the last 20 years, and before that they claimed they are only TEN years into the future (in 1990. so they would dominate by... 2000). Toyota Shareholders and workers will suffer because of the EGO of those damned fools execs who wasted TEN YEARS, letting TESLA dominate the BEV industry (of the FREE WORLD, China excluded).
  • Urlik You’d think VW would have learned from Honda and Cadillac making the same mistake to varying degrees.
  • EBFlex This will be the end of the Dodge brand. They are going from making vehicles people actually want to little pieces of garbage like the hornet and government cars (EVs).