New Plan! Tesla Decides to Keep Stores, Raise Prices

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s hard to keep up with the endless tweaks and about-faces made to Tesla’s short-term sales and pricing strategies. Some automakers roll out changes and stick to them for years; Tesla pulls over and adjusts its near-term operations from a rest stop off the side of the interstate.

The latest change to Tesla’s game plan involves a reversal of a strategy announced just a couple of weeks ago. The lion’s share of Tesla’s stores will not close, after all. And, instead of prices dropping across the board to reflect the cost savings, the automaker will raise them instead.

Sales will still be online-only, however.

The U-turn comes after another such direction change — this one in Tesla’s financial standing. After two profitable quarters in the second half of 2018, the automaker predicted nothing but profits going forward. Not so fast, CEO Elon Musk said recently.

It was reported last week that Tesla’s store closures have already led to an 8-percent drop in employee headcount, with some staffers claiming they first found out about their perilous job status from news reports, not the company that employed them. Some can breathe easier now.

“Over the past two weeks we have been closely evaluating every single Tesla retail location, and we have decided to keep significantly more stores open than previously announced as we continue to evaluate them over the course of several months,” the automaker said in a Sunday blog post.

Tesla claims the stores — 10 percent of total locations — which have already closed were always going to close. Blame low foot traffic, the automaker said. Now, certain stores in high-profile locations have reopened with a smaller “crew,” while another 20 percent are under review.

Of that crop, “depending on their effectiveness over the next few months, some will be closed and some will remain open,” Tesla claims.

While the storefront cull was expected to yield an average price reduction of 6 percent on Tesla vehicles (minus the just-unveiled $35,000 Model 3 variant), the retention of roughly half of Tesla’s stores means pricing will need to reflect the added cost. The company said customers have until March 18th to order a car at that earlier, revised pricing. (Again, the Standard Range Model 3’s price remains fixed.)

Because it’s following through on only half of the anticipated store closings, Tesla claims the price drop will be half of what customers were told to expect. Thus, prices are rising 3 percent from that short-lived trough.

Another recent promise is still alive — at least for now. The 1,000-mile, seven-day return policy remains in place, Tesla claims.

[Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 41 comments
  • Indi500fan Indi500fan on Mar 11, 2019

    #1 of Deming's 14 points Constancy of purpose

    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Mar 11, 2019

      We should really talk more about Deming. People tend to lump Toyota/Honda/etc together, but really there is Toyota, and everyone else. And the difference for Toyota, when there was a difference, was Deming (statistical process control, variation reduction). (OK OK I also like him because he wanted to "...eliminate the annual rating or merit system" - point 12) My family recently acquired its first real live Toyota (2010 model) after I quit working for the other guys. I love the reliability (but I absolutely despise the old-style oil filter design).

  • B534202 B534202 on Mar 11, 2019

    "(Again, the Standard Range Model 3’s price remains fixed.)" Until Musk changes his mind 5 minutes later.

  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
  • The Oracle Some commenters have since passed away when this series got started.
  • The Oracle Honda is generally conservative yet persistent, this will work in one form or fashion.
Next