An Icon of Detroit's Ruin, Packard Plant Bridge Collapses, Fades Into History

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

If you drive, or walk, down Woodward Ave. from Detroit’s New Center area to downtown, you can’t help but notice the economic development along that corridor. Detroit has bottomed out. Areas formerly bereft of businesses and housing have been filled in, and hopefully that development will start spreading east and west of Woodward, Detroit’s version of Main Street. Over on the east side of town, one of America’s most blighted urban areas, there is another hopeful sign — a symbol of the city and domestic automobile industry’s decline has literally come crashing down.

The Packard plant bridge over East Grand Boulevard, target of lazy photojournalists for years, collapsed last week, perhaps due to extreme temperature swings the midwest has seen recently.

Detroit’s massive, sprawling, and mostly abandoned Packard plant, where for decades some of the world’s most prestigious luxury cars were made, has long been a symbol of the Motor City’s decline. It has made for dramatic photography for slothful news editors looking to illustrate the deterioration of both one of America’s great cities and one of its primary industries. It was recently used as the backdrop for the opening episode of the third season of Amazon’s Clarkson/Hammond/May vehicle, The Grand Tour.

However, the Packard factory really has nothing at all to do with how the Big Three managed to screw the pooch in the Malaise Era, ultimately giving up big fractions of market share to Japanese, German, and now Korean automakers over the past 40 years.

At the time of its construction in the early 20th century, the Packard plant was a modern marvel. The product of the genius of architect Albert Kahn and his engineer brother Julius (who developed reinforced concrete floors), the factory was obsolete by 1956, when it produced its last car and a struggling, about-to-die Packard moved production to a smaller, more efficient facility. It should be noted that Packard failed at a time when the Big Three were enjoying record sales and big profits. Chevy and Ford each sold over a million full-size cars in 1957. The problems particular to Packard’s demise had little or nothing to do with the structural problems of the domestic auto industry 60 years later.

Despite the fact it stopped produced cars long before most of you were born, the massive and sprawling factory that produced Packard automobiles erroneously became a symbol of the ills of the domestic auto industry that came to a head in 2007-2009, culminating in the bankruptcies and federal bailouts of General Motors and Chrysler.

If there is one image of the Packard plant that is genuinely iconic, a synedoche, a symbol that stands for the whole, it was the bridge that spanned East Grand Boulevard that was actually part of the Packard assembly line. As the facility was developed into the 1930s, buildings were added in an almost haphazard manner, and the bridge was used to transport partially assembled cars from one department to another.

In 2015, Arte Express, the company owned by Peruvian developer Fernando Palazuelo that has started redeveloping the site, starting with Packard’s administration building adjacent to the bridge, wrapped the graffiti covered bridge in a theatrical scrim printed with an image of how the bridge looked in the factory’s heyday.

They said at the time they would begin work on the bridge, but recent press reports say the fact that Arte Express only owns the northern half of the bridge hindered that work. The city of Detroit owns the southern half of the bridge and the adjacent building on the south side of East Grand Blvd. The city government’s involvement in the site has been a point of contention with owners and potential developers over the decades.

There is no word from Arte Express as to whether they plan on rebuilding the iconic structure. The city has hired a private demolition company to remove the wrecked span and clear the debris from the street. East Grand Boulevard will be closed while that takes place.

[Images: http://www.instagram.com/camera_jesus, historicdetroit.org/Twitter, Ronnie Schreiber, Amazon]

Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 165 comments
  • Markf Markf on Feb 03, 2019

    "I feel sorry for you, Mark. What are you going to do when the economy drops out from under you… again?" Feel sorry all you like. The economic has never"dropped out from under me" What are YOU going to do when Trump wins...again?

    • See 3 previous
    • Markf Markf on Feb 04, 2019

      @el scotto " Isuspect that a great many of our right-leaning commenters are proud that our President bases a lot of his actions on the opinions of a blonde transvestite and an obese opioid addict." This is Left, homophobic, fat shaming, addict shaming all in one comment

  • -Nate -Nate on Feb 04, 2019

    " I also heavily invested cash in stocks funds right after 2008 crash." The wise move to be sure . When investing, look to the long play, not clash, grab cash and slip ~ that's how most loose out . 'heavy investment' means different things to different people, I too gathered all the $ I could and fleshed out my investments, I don't ever expect to touch them, they're for my grand kids who'll inherit them for better or worse . -Nate

  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. Will be watching this with interest. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
  • THX1136 A less expensive EV would make it more attractive. For the record, I've never purchased a brand new vehicle as I have never been able to afford anything but used. I think the same would apply to an EV. I also tend to keep a vehicle way longer than most folks do - 10+ years. If there was a more affordable one right now then other things come to bear. There are currently no chargers in my immediate area (town of 16K). I don't know if I can afford to install the necessary electrical service to put one in my car port right now either. Other than all that, I would want to buy what I like from a cosmetic standpoint. That would be a Charger EV which, right now, doesn't exist and I couldn't afford anyway. I would not buy an EV just to be buying an EV. Nothing against them either. Most of my constraints are purely financial being 71 with a disabled wife and on a fixed income.
  • ToolGuy Two more thoughts, ok three:a) Will this affordable EV have expressive C/D pillars, detailing on the rocker panels and many many things happening around the headlamps? Asking for a friend.b) Will this affordable EV have interior soft touch plastics and materials lifted directly from a European luxury sedan? Because if it does not, the automotive journalists are going to mention it and that will definitely spoil my purchase decision.c) Whatever the nominal range is, I need it to be 2 miles more, otherwise no deal. (+2 rule is iterative)
  • Zerofoo No.My wife has worked from home for a decade and I have worked from home post-covid. My commute is a drive back and forth to the airport a few times a year. My every-day predictable commute has gone away and so has my need for a charge at home commuter car.During my most recent trip I rented a PHEV. Avis didn't bother to charge it, and my newly renovated hotel does not have chargers on the property. I'm not sure why rental fleet buyers buy plug-in vehicles.Charging infrastructure is a chicken and egg problem that will not be solved any time soon.
Next