Germany Engineering Firm Pleads Guilty to Involvement in VW Emissions Scandal
IAV GmbH, the German engineering company co-owned by Volkswagen Group, plead guilty to a felony count of conspiracy in a U.S. District Court on Friday, to the surprise of absolutely no one. Last month, authorities said the firm had already agreed to a guilty plea and multi-million-dollar fine for its role in helping Volkswagen Group develop software that could effectively help cars falsify emissions test results.
That makes the courtroom officiation little more than a formality. While the court wants to conducts a probationary investigation, effectively delaying sentencing until May 22nd, there is little doubt what the final penalty will be — $35 million and two years of operation under the supervision of a court-appointed monitor.
“The proposed agreement is an important step forward for IAV,” Kai-Stefan Linnenkohl, the company’s president, said in a prepared statement on Friday. “The misconduct identified does not reflect who we are today as a company, business partner or employer … We are committed to a culture of compliance and accountability and will continue to serve our customers as a reliable partner, providing the high level of service, quality and innovation they have come to expect.”
According to Automotive News, IAV’s penance has to be set at $35 million because the court couldn’t legally impose a “higher fine amount without jeopardizing its continued viability.” The company’s involvement has been deemed essential in creating the emission’s scandal that rocked Volkswagen and, more recently, brought Audi managers up on charges.
However, most of Audi’s problems relate to the 3.0-liter turbodiesel motors, whereas IAV’s involvement relates to the 2.0-liter diesels.
From Automotive News:
The software developed by IAV, headquartered in Berlin with offices in suburban Detroit, enabled Volkswagen to cheat on emissions testing to win certification for its Gen 1 2.0-liter turbodiesel vehicles, beginning in the 2009 model year.
Appearing before U.S. District Judge Sean Cox Friday morning, IAV pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and the automaker’s customers in the U.S. to violate the Clean Air Act. The engineering company had agreed to plead guilty in a plea agreement last month.
IAV’s plea documents claim that engineers “delegated certain tasks associated with designing its [Gen 1] diesel engine to IAV, including parts of software development, diesel development and exhaust aftertreatment.”
“In November 2006, a VW employee requested that an IAV employee assist in the design of defeat device software for use in the diesel engine. The IAV employee agreed to do so and prepared documentation for a software design change to recognize whether a vehicle was undergoing standard U.S. emissions testing on a dynamometer or it was being driven on the road under normal driving conditions.”
Volkswagen Group later used the software’s ability to distinguish between testing and normal driving in order to achieve emissions certification. The Justice Department believes at least one IAV manager knew the purpose of the defeat device software by 2008 and instructed IAV employees to continue working on the project anyway. But prosecutors have said the company’s involvement was relatively minor when taking the larger picture into account.
“IAV’s role in this offense is not like the role of VW in this offense,” assistant U.S. Attorney John Neal said on Friday.
[Image: Volkswagen]
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- ToolGuy a) Can the brand successfully offer more vehicles that are affordable to more consumers? Yes if they decide to, for two reasons: a1) If and when they introduce the 'Model 2'/'Redwood'/whatever (or other 'low-cost' model or models) -- my understanding is they had valid reasons for waiting. a2) Tesla has gotten good at efficiency/cost reduction and passing (some of) the savings along. ¶ b) Would you be interested in a more affordable Tesla? b1) Yes, maybe, eventually but in the near term 'more affordable' Teslas should tend to make -all- used Teslas more affordable and this interests me more because I sort of kind of have my eye on a nice Model S one of these years. (Have never driven one, don't spoil the ending for me if you hate it.)
- Aja8888 Notice no photos with the top down. They break...a lot on the Eos. And parts are unobtanium (besides no one wanting to work on the complicated flogging top).
- Michael S6 Tesla need to keep upgrading its existing products in order to face the fierce competition. The upgrade of model 3 was a major step forward although cost cutting such as getting rid of turn stalk was a downer. Model Y and S are in need of major upgrade. This should be Tesla's priority and not producing a less expensive no profit model
- ToolGuy Seems harmless, but it must be a trap.
- Robert I don’t consider Tesla terribly upmarket. Certainly not the 3 or Y. They are in an unenviable position from my perspective - a couple of halo-ish cars (S, X and truck), but all the volume is on the low end and all stale at this point. Car manufacturers can’t be everything for everyone. I wont buy a Tesla because out here in Krazy Kalifornia they are too pedestrian. And they all look the same. In the same color. I am sure they are fine car though. 21 XC90, 22 Mini Cooper SE and a 24 Mustang GT in my garage.
Comments
Join the conversation
"IAV’s penance has to be set at $35 million because the court couldn’t legally impose a “higher fine amount without jeopardizing its continued viability'" When punitive damages are capped just shy of corporate death, the courts are just a legally extortionate arm of the government.
IAV, engine supplier to the earthshaking Elio Motors. This'll put the eight year old timeline back - perhaps there'll be a 3 cylinder trike and 85 mpg by 2026 instead of 2022. Hold your breath, true believers!