Fiat Chrysler Nears Settlement Over Dirty Diesel Allegations

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles is on the cusp of reaching a settlement with the U.S. Justice Department over undeclared emissions control software that allowed 104,000 diesel vehicles to pollute beyond legal limits.

The settlement is expected to include significant civil penalties and fines to account for the excess diesel emissions while also covering claims from the Justice Department, various U.S. states, and vehicle owners — similar to Volkswagen’s “Dieselgate” settlement. A final agreement could be reached any day now.

According to Reuters, FCA declined to comment on the matter this week, but previously denied any intentionally illicit behavior, noting there was never any attempt made to create software that would circumvent U.S. emissions regulations. Still, the company may have realized this assurance might not matter in the courts, as it set aside $815 million to cover potential costs associated with the case.

While not nearly as grand as Volkswagen Group’s emission snafu, FCA’s diesel discrepancy remains a serious issue. The Justice Department sought significant penalties for the automaker since filing its lawsuit in May of 2017. The outlet even noted that U.S. and California regulators stepped up diesel scrutiny after VW admitted to illegally installing software designed to fool emissions tests in 2015. Unchecked, the company was allowed to get away with it for years. As retribution, Volkswagen Group agreed to pay over $25 billion in the United States.

From Reuters:

Reuters reported in February that a settlement offer sent to Fiat Chrysler lawyers by the Justice Department in January 2018 would require the company to offset excess pollution and take steps to prevent future excess emissions. The letter included language that a settlement must include very substantial civil penalties.

The company and government lawyers have sparred for months over the size of penalties, [one source] said.

The Justice Department has a separate ongoing criminal investigation into the excess emissions. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a group of U.S. state attorneys general have also been investigating.

Helping to damn the Italian-American company are a series of emails from 2010, in which the person in charge of the controls and calibration for supplier VM Motori (which furnishes EcoDiesel motors for the Ram and Jeep brands) suggested Fiat Chrysler was interested in software that could detect test cycles in order to achieve — and advertise — superior fuel economy figures for specific models.

At the start of the year, the Justice Department offered Fiat Chrysler settlement terms that would include recalling all 2014-2016 models equipped with the EcoDiesel V6 in order to bring their emissions software into compliance. Regulators also demanded the automaker pay a “very substantial fine [that would] adequately reflect the seriousness of the conduct that led to these violations.” Some believed the automaker could face financial penalties amounting to over $4 billion.

FCA isn’t the only automaker in hot water over the finer points of emissions testing, however. Regulators have been probing diesel emissions in Daimler vehicles for some time. The German manufacturer said in financial filings it faces ongoing investigations from U.S. and German authorities into excess diesel emissions that could eventually lead to significant financial penalties and some recalls.

[Image: FCA]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Jan 09, 2019

    I had defended FCA here on this matter, thinking that only VAG was cheating. It's very disappointing. But it looks like anyone doing diesel was looking for loopholes, and now the jig is up - and not just with passenger car diesels.

  • Jkk6 Jkk6 on Jan 10, 2019

    So will the trucks require registration under my name OR just a long term parking spot to become a beneficiary of this malicious class action.

  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
Next