Electrification's Silver Lining: Audi CEO Announces PB 18 E-tron Production Plans [Updated]

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Audi unveiled the PB 18 e-tron Concept at the 2018 Pebble Beach Concours d’Elegance with absolutely no assurance that it would ever be more than a fun idea. In fact, the company outright said it had no plans to put the vehicle into production. Miraculously, Audi flip-flopped, and the electrified hypercar is now slated for assembly.

You might hate it, but this is one of the few concept vehicles to ever make this author cream the proverbial jeans during office hours. Maybe it’s because I normally wait until the darkest point of the evening to unfurl my shame over a bottle of homemade wine and revisit vintage photo rolls of the Honda Unibox and Suzuki Regina — the latter of which was too good for this world.

However, whether or not Audi can successfully capture the magic of the PB 18 Concept remains to be seen.

Playing host to a trio of electric motors producing up to 764 hp and 612 lb-ft of torque, plus some of the most interesting automotive styling and tech we’ve seen since the last Blade Runner film, getting the PB 18 right could be exceedingly difficult for the automaker. Following its debut in Pebble Beach, my first thought was “wow,” followed by “this thing would be ludicrously expensive to build.”

According to the Dutch division of AutoWeek, Audi thinks the PB 18 might be worth it. The company received a lot of praise for the model and thinks it could serve as a halo vehicle for its burgeoning e-tron subsidiary. Announced at Audi’s Mission Zero event, which marked the launch of the e-tron brand in the very EV-friendly Netherlands, Audi CEO Bram Schot said the model would be limited to just 50 examples.

It’s slightly strange that the company chose an exclusively European event focusing on the elimination of pollution and climate change to announce the PB 18, but the car’s role as an EV doesn’t make the decision completely nonsensical. Still, it does make one worry the car might not be available in the United States — not that I’ll ever be able to afford one.

Even if Audi only loosely adheres to the concept, the e-tron will probably still cost more than most homes. The car that debuted at Pebble Beach had a 95 kWh solid-state battery capable of 310 miles when fully charged. Maximum range would likely fall off rather quickly when the PB 18 unleashes all 671 horsepower through all four wheels. Of course, its kinetic energy recovery system allows for intermittent periods where up to 764 hp becomes available. Either way, Audi claims the car can reach 60 mph in just over two seconds and can replenish its battery in only 15 minutes using inductive charging.

It’s also made entirely of aluminum, carbon fiber, and various composite mediums to ensure lightness. Audi quoted its weight at around 3,417 pounds, thanks to the lightweight materials. Add in adaptive aerodynamics, a slick suspension, and a driver’s seat that can reposition itself based on how aggressively you want to be with the e-tron, and it starts to become clear we’re talking about a vehicle with an MSRP that might end in -illion rather than -ousand.

The PB 18 is very advanced and, as we know, advanced is a term that’s synonymous with expensive in the auto industry. If Audi is really serious about building this thing, we would expect them to nix the movable cockpit, ditch the solid-state battery (maybe for a plug-in hybrid system), and scrap some of the more expensive building materials. Fortunately, Audi already said autonomous features would be nonexistent, sarcastically boasting that the model would have “Level 0 autonomy.” Because it’s a driver’s car, see.

I just hope they don’t muck it up. This has the makings of a truly legendary automobile. Unfortunately, something tells me that whatever Audi delivers will eventually become the blueprint for a Lamborghini follow-up that Volkswagen Group will stipulate must be the superior car.

We’ve reached out to Audi to see what else we can find out, and will update accordingly.

UPDATE: An Audi spokeswoman responded by saying the North American media team had no information on the status of the PB 18’s production status and that the whole situation was “was likely a misunderstanding.” If so, that’s a pretty big muck up on AutoWeek’s part. The only alternative is that something got majorly lost in translation and this was what passes for a joke in the Netherlands or Audi’s CEO wasn’t supposed to spill the beans yet.

[Images: Audi]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 10 comments
  • Crashdaddy430 Crashdaddy430 on Jan 12, 2019

    I love it. Reminds me of modern interpretation of 80s concept car.

    • INeon INeon on Jan 13, 2019

      Looks like a big girl with a tattoo of a smaller girl on her backside.

  • Ttacgreg Ttacgreg on Jan 12, 2019

    Honda Unibox and Suzuki Regina?? Just searched images of these. Thanks, now my '16 Prius looks a little better to my mind's eye than before.

    • Matt Posky Matt Posky on Jan 13, 2019

      I love that you fell into my trap and came out clean on the other side.

  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
Next