Ace of Base: 2019 Dodge Durango SXT RWD

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

America. It’s generally thought of as the country where everything is bigger and customers get a lot more for a lot less. Take the price of fuel, for example, or the portions at any all-you-can-eat buffet.

Viewed in that light, this base model Durango should have an American flag on the hood and pictures of bald eagles stitched into the seats. This is a lot of truck for less than $30,000.

First things first – just like the rest of Dodge’s lineup, this thing is older than Methuselah. Appearing in the last Ice Age 2011, the current Durango showed up a couple of years after Chrysler’s embarrassing sojourn through bankruptcy. Built alongside the Grand Cherokee in Detroit’s Jefferson North plant, this is a big machine. Dodge says it measures 201.2 inches in length, standing about 76 inches wide and 71 inches tall.

For comparison, the present Ford Explorer is about three inches shorter and a couple thousand bucks more expensive. It is also based on a front-drive platform, and front-wheel drive is for the feeble. The next Explorer will be rear-drive, of course, just like the Durango shown here.

The 2019 Durango is a five-passenger affair at its base price of $29,995. A third row of seats can be added to the SXT trim for an extra charge, but most buyers are better off using that back-back space for cargo, anyway. From a practicality standpoint, the Durango’s centre console and storage cubbies are more useful and logically laid out than in its GC brother. My sole complaint is the low-rent 7-inch Uconnect screen. Thanks to economies of scale, however, even the base model gets tri-zone climate control

Externally, the Durango looks every bit an SUV, not some sort of anemic crossover. Base SXTs still receive fog lights and a chrome cow-catcher gunsight grille standing in front of the cheap-to-maintain Pentastar V6. Racetrack-style taillights adorn the rear and look just as good on the Durango as they do on my Charger. The color shown here, Octane Red, is a no-charge option. So’s a purpley In-Violet hue, if you’re so inclined.

Big portions, bold styling, small price. Sounds like America to me.

[Images: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selection.

The model above is shown in American dollars with American options and trim, absent of destination charges and available rebates. As always, your dealer may sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 66 comments
  • Maui_zaui Maui_zaui on Jan 30, 2019

    I rented a Durango GT on a recent trip and was pleasantly surprised. I would love to try the RT and of course the SRT, but I do agree the V6 was 'good enough'. In terms of features, content, and looks, the GT trim is the sweet spot for me. Hopefully, the good thing about it being on an old platform means they've worked out any big problem or issues.

  • AdamOfAus AdamOfAus on Jan 30, 2019

    I wish the Australian market got the Durango over the "Holden" Arcadia.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next