By on November 2, 2018

tesla model 3

Due to China’s increased tariffs on U.S.-manufactured vehicles, Tesla’s sales have taken a moderate beating there. Like any automaker hoping to move metal within the region, it wants a solution and seems to have come up with one. While there appears to be little hope of the brand’s larger vehicles circumventing the nation’s 40 percent import duty, there’s still hope for the Model 3.

The plan is a familiar one.

Last month, Tesla announced it had purchased over 200-acres for Gigafactory 3 in China and mentioned it was running with an accelerated construction plan. It wants to start building cars there next year, which would be an incredible turnaround time, targeting output of 3,000 Model 3 vehicles per week in Shanghai, according to Reuters.

It’s ambitious but not impossible. Gigafactory 3 could simply be used for final assembly, similar to Europe, at least initially, which would permit Tesla to avoid China’s colossal tariffs and cut down on the time it takes to get everything ready. However, the automaker’s long-term plans include using the facility to manufacture the Model Y pickup in addition to full-scale Model 3 assembly.

All told, the electric carmaker said wants to continue progressing Model 3 production to about 10,000 units per week anyway it can. The majority of those vehicles will be built in Fremont, California. Tesla said it expects to bolster Model 3 output on its home turf to 7,000 units per week. Right now, it’s believed to be averaging around 4,700 vehicles every seven days.

[Image: Tesla Motors]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

11 Comments on “Side-stepping Tariffs: Tesla Sets Chinese Target of 3,000 Model 3s Per Week...”


  • avatar
    APaGttH

    So much winning.

  • avatar
    SCE to AUX

    “…the Model Y pickup”

    The Model Y will be a CUV. The Tesla pickup remains nameless, I believe.

  • avatar
    indi500fan

    Do all the cool kids in China want a Tesla?

    Reading Tweater, it appears the cool kids in the US are having a ton of quality problems with their new Model 3s. They may be built “tent tough” but the paint work and body fits seem on par with Detroit 1980.

  • avatar
    Asdf

    The Chinese specialize in locally manufactured crap, there’s no need for them to assemble crappy, inherently defective BEVs from US parts made by an incompetent manufacturer that is chronically unable to design competitive BEVs.

  • avatar
    EBFlex

    He can barely do that here after years of trying.

    Musk is such a fraud.

  • avatar
    Lockstops

    So Musk says 3000 per week next year, so in honest-man-speak that equals 500 per week in three years. In a tent, with the result barely something you can actually call a ‘car’.

  • avatar
    Robbie

    Tesla’s problem is that the biggest natural markets for its product are overseas, but it is stuck in the US. Density in America’s cities is low, and pollution therefore is not a truly pressing problem. In addition, the political right seems to think of pollution as a virtue.

    • 0 avatar
      SCE to AUX

      You’re evidently unaware that many – if not most – EV buyers are not tree huggers, especially Tesla buyers.

      And Tesla has sold a lot of cars overseas, just not the Model 3 yet.

      • 0 avatar
        el scotto

        SCE, most of the Prius/Leaf owners I know are engineers.The Tesla owners I know drive Model S’. Yeah, they can drop 80k for a new car. Kinda funny how abundant charging in urban areas; yeah, there’s an app for that, and low maintenance seems to work for them. I do wonder if Bolt/Volt owners can charge for free at a Chevy dealership.

  • avatar
    Master Baiter

    “In addition, the political right seems to think of pollution as a virtue.”

    Modern internal combustion cars don’t pollute to any significant degree. The Watermelons had to invent global warming (now “climate change”) hysteria in order to classify CO2, otherwise known as plant food, as a pollutant.

    If anyone believes that CO2 will really destroy the planet, he/she can take immediate action to permanently remediate his/her own CO2 emissions. Anything less is pure hypocrisy. Just make sure to leave a note so we all know the extent of your posthumous virtue.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • dukeisduke: “The collaboration also includes a joint development agreement that brings together two leaders in...
  • FreedMike: Agreed, I had a loaded-up Alero sedan as a rental once. It was a darn nice drive and a fine sleeper.
  • dukeisduke: I don’t know – they left out the word “impactful”, my least favorite...
  • MrIcky: “more displacement, less turbos” – which competes against mileage, possibly driving up...
  • FreedMike: There’s ruching, and then there’s this: https://i.pinimg.com/origin...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Timothy Cain, Canada
  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States