BMW Buying Out Brilliance Automotive in China, Adding Capacity for U.S.

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Now that China has relaxed its joint-ownership mandates, BMW has announced that it will procure a majority stake in its venture with Brilliance Automotive. The German firm will be the first foreign automaker to have majority control of its business in the region.

Being first will not come cheaply, however. It will cost BMW $4.2 billion to assume control with a majority stake of 75 percent of the business — albeit as part of a larger deal. All the manufacturer has to do is come up with the funds and wait until 2022, when rules limiting foreign ownership for all Chinese auto ventures are officially lifted.

BMW has said that both partners have signed a corresponding agreement, but noted that the transaction is still subject to the approval of the relevant authorities and the consent of the Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd Shareholders’ Meeting.

The plan also extends the cooperative contract that makes BMW Brilliance Automotive (BBA) possible through 2040 and includes investments into new and existing plant structures in Shenyang (where Brilliance is currently headquartered) over the coming years. At least one new facility is expected following the deal’s ratification, with additional cash going into modernizing older factories.

“We are now embarking on a new era,” BMW CEO Harald Krueger said during the plan’s announcement. According to Reuters, he also thanked Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, whom he said “personally supported” the arrangement.

With both the United States and China looking as if they are going to continue escalating auto tariffs against each other, The People’s Republic may have been left with little recourse. It’s already procured access to Western tech and secured longterm investments since becoming the world’s largest auto market. Foreign automakers have also wanted more control of Chinese operations ever since they started doing business within the country.

Everyone expects other manufacturers to follow suit. Daimler boss Dieter Zetsche told Reuters last week that signals from the Chinese authorities were encouraging. However, Dr. Z noted that Mercedes-Benz did not yet have legal permission to make any financial moves that would allow it to buy out BAIC Motor and take majority control of Beijing Benz.

“If we do, we need to see what opportunities there are,” Zetsche said at the Paris Motor Show.

Such an arrangement is also likely to help automakers cope with China’s dwindling demand for luxury vehicles. BMW has been among the hardest hit, since it ships its most popular SUVs from its U.S. plant in Spartanburg to China. Those vehicles have been subjected to several suspicious “customs investigations” and slapped with exceptionally high retaliatory tariffs.

“[The] number one reason why we invest in China is because we are absolutely convinced the market has a further growth potential,” explained BMW finance chief Nicolas Peter. He also said the company would be investing in extra capacity for the United States, which is not considered a growth market.

Our hot take? The trade war has made it so that it only pays to build where you sell.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next