Ford Seeking $238 Million Tax Break for Big Move

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

For Ford, returning to the city of Detroit means first checking off a long list of tax abatements — breaks it says it needs in order to pull off its planned Corktown campus. That would mean $103 million in lost future tax revenue for the city itself, though total incentive package Ford wants amounts to $238.6 million.

Depending on which direction you’re coming from, it’s either agregious or just the cost of doing business.

The automaker hopes to turn the now-purchased Michigan Central Station and a slew or surrounding buildings and properties into a high-tech hub. From this campus, in which Ford says will invest $740 million, up to 5,000 workers, half of them Ford employees, will develop the next generation of vehicle-related tech, as well as vehicles themselves — just not of the internal combustion, pickup variety. Renovating the long-abandoned train station and transforming it into a public/corporate nerve center stands to eat up a large slice of the cash.

Monday night, the automaker laid out its wish list to the Detroit Economic Growth Corp. According to the Detroit Free Press, Ford hopes to gain $103,591,804 in tax incentives from the city, with the remaining abatements bringing the total to $238,559,497.

The largest abatement on the list concerns just over $208 million in deferred property taxes, city corporate income tax, and utility users tax over the period of 30 years, of which the city’s on the hook for over $90 million. Nearly $29 million in incentives would come from commercial and rehabilitated sites having their property taxes frozen for a period of 12 to 15 years, while a smaller sum concerns residential development in the campus. Those breaks would save future residents money, not Ford.

Each campus property lies in a Renaissance Zone — places where residents and businesses are eligible for combined tax breaks from the city, Wayne County, and the State of Michigan. The three entities formed the zones to attract residents and employment in the hopes of stabilizing economically depressed areas of Detroit. Economic opportunity, neighborhood improvement, and a boosted local economy serving those extra paychecks is the goal of the program.

The Free Press heard an earfull against the abatements, though the city and state were apparently willing to hand over $4 billion in tax breaks if Amazon decided to locate its second headquarters in the Motor City. Ford is hardly the only company to arrive in Detroit and ask for incentives it’s eligible for. It’s just the most recent. Could it go without? Sure —the extra tax it would have to pay over the coming few decades would be the equivalent of one or two big product recalls, and there’s been no shortage of those recently. But neither is it being forced to come to Corktown.

The city votes on the tax package on October 16th.

[Image: Ford/ YouTube]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 31 comments
  • Vehic1 Vehic1 on Sep 11, 2018

    Sub-600: Yes, NC is a very progressive Southern state; that's why it's growing so much more in population than Alabama, Mississippi, etc. - people want to live there. Cities like Charlotte, Raleigh, Durham, Asheville attract outsiders; they aren't just the same old sleepy towns anymore.

  • Superdessucke Superdessucke on Sep 12, 2018

    Early warm up tosses, for when they come to the nation as a whole asking for their bailout after the next economic downturn in 3-4 years.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next